Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Gabriel Weindel

Preview
Thalamic bursts modulate cortical synchrony locally to switch between states of global functional connectivity in a cognitive task Author summary A novel machine-learning method was applied to unveil the dynamics of local and cortex-wide neural coordination underlying the fundamental cognitive processes involved in a memory task....

And that paper could be the bridge: journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol...

6 days ago 2 0 0 0
Decision-making components and times revealed by the single-trial electro-encephalogram

This is gold, especially your preprint. It's like two research line from different background converge, here (elifesciences.org/reviewed-pre...) we show how single trial ERP aligned time align with perceptual/attentional and decision laws. Thanks for all the references, I'll take a close look!

6 days ago 1 0 1 0

Very interesting! John Anderson et al. did a similar thing a few years ago ('Bump related potentials') but from another, more cog psych, perspective: act-r.psy.cmu.edu/wordpress/wp... see also github.com/GWeindel/hmp

Maybe these 'bumps' are beta bursts!

1 week ago 2 0 1 0

Isn't it that hybrid (I.e. trying to get $ from subscription and OA) have the highest OA APC?

1 week ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Refusal to Review I wrote the below email, when invited to review a paper that was partially processed by ChatGPT. As I imagine the email could be useful inspiration for others, I decided to make it available. Feel …

“Feel free to adapt and reuse. No attribution needed (…) If you make an adaption that you also want to share, I’d love to know about it, too.”

irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2026/04/08/r...

1 week ago 435 176 9 16

A very nice little conference in the memory of a brilliant colleague Laurence Questienne. Consider attending if you're into cognitive control, performance monitoring and listening to talks while seeing the Mediterranean sea

1 week ago 2 0 0 0
Post image Post image Post image Post image

When recording experimental data, have you ever:
1) overwritten data?
2) changed the experiment and forgot when?
3) had a student leave the lab leaving a mess of dataset?
4) noticed how everyone has their own way to transfer data?

We published a solution: LSLAutoBIDS - open science by design.

🧵

1 week ago 29 12 1 1
Post image

Barman et al. describe LSLAutoBIDS, an open-source #Python package that implements an automated workflow for data integration, curation, versioning, and publishing: doi.org/10.52294/001...

#OpenDatasets #SpecialIssue
@benediktehinger.bsky.social

2 weeks ago 5 4 0 1

Recommended, great lab also!

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0

Happy to share our new preprint:

Uncovering the representational geometry of durations

Is time represented along a single mental timeline? We combine behaviour + EEG to show that duration is organised in a richer, multidimensional space.

w/ @lnalborczyk.bsky.social & @virginievanw.bsky.social

2 weeks ago 39 15 1 4
Advertisement
Post image

New paper in Imaging Neuroscience by Lauren C. Fong, Daniel Feuerriegel, et al:

Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions

doi.org/10.1162/IMAG...

3 weeks ago 19 10 0 1

Exciting! Where's the Swiss garden?! 👩‍🌾👨‍🌾🧑‍🌾

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

CuttingGardens 2026 is back 🌍
Global EEG & MEG multi-hub meeting
📅 Save the date: Sept 21–25
20+ Gardens worldwide 🇦🇷🇦🇺🇧🇪🇨🇱🇨🇳🇨🇺🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🇳🇱🇵🇱🇪🇸🇨🇭🇹🇭🇹🇳🇬🇧🇺🇾🇺🇸🇳🇬🇰🇪🇪🇬🇹🇿
Join the movement 🌱
#EEG #MEG #Neuroscience #OpenScience #CuttingGardens

3 weeks ago 17 9 3 2

An initiative you might be interested in if you haven't seen it already :)

bsky.app/profile/ncla...

3 weeks ago 1 0 0 0

Oups sorry I should have said artifact correction. I typically use peak to peak rejection with a very high threshold. I can't speak for the authors but personally I do still do p-to-p after GEDAI but for the same dataset my rejection rate went from 15% to 1% 😁

4 weeks ago 1 0 1 0

MNE compatible yes, worked very smoothly for me. It's developed mainly by @vferat.bsky.social

4 weeks ago 3 0 0 0

I would still avoid artifact corrections when possible but if unavoidable that will probably be my goto from now on!

Links:
- paper : www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
- python package that I'm using (but there's also matlab) github.com/neurotuning/...

4 weeks ago 3 1 3 0

OK folks, this is a very convincing EEG artifact rejection method both theoretically and practically from my short experience. It's the only method I tried that gets rid of pervasive artifacts in a dataset I'm currently analyzing!

4 weeks ago 13 5 1 0
Walkthrough video of "Return of the GEDAI: Unsupervised EEG denoising based on Leadfield Filtering"
Walkthrough video of "Return of the GEDAI: Unsupervised EEG denoising based on Leadfield Filtering" YouTube video by MrTomasros

youtu.be/qSM5narynzc?...

1 month ago 7 3 0 2
Advertisement

Very interesting and cool joint modeling! My understanding is: estimate inter-trial variability of drift rate in DDM and prey that it's not also another underlying mechanism that generates slow errors (as is probably the case)

1 month ago 4 0 0 0

Super excited to share that our paper, “Multiple Partially Overlapping Neural Modules Orchestrate Conflict Processing,” has been accepted for publication in Imaging Neuroscience! 🎉
1/n

w/ @tgro.bsky.social @manuelvarlet.bsky.social Edmund Wascher, Patrick Gajewski

direct.mit.edu/imag/article...

1 month ago 22 10 1 0

"If everyone thinks technological trends are inescapable, they probably will become so. That is why those serious about the human prospect should reject the rhetoric of fatalism and demand something more substantial."

1 month ago 0 2 0 0

A new meta analysis from the lab based on an open meta-dataset we have curated in the past few years

1 month ago 3 1 0 0
Preview
No, “AI” is not a Stochastic Parrot 🦜 I’ve recently come across a new flavor of AI denialism making the rounds.

"AI" is not a stochastic parrot.🦜
I wrote this piece a couple weeks ago, but it was hard for me to finish up given AI's role in society and war over the past few weeks. I should share it at some point though. Not perfect, but here it is.
medium.com/@margarmitch...

1 month ago 207 84 19 19

I usually don't rant on stuff here but not sharing your position on that topic makes an implicit signal that you're fine with it, especially for younger researchers.

1 month ago 4 0 0 0

The only use I see, is a coding agent for stuff that I know how to do, but where I get lost in syntax. But even for that I want open source models not over-trained by precarious workers/modern slaves to impress investors.

1 month ago 1 1 1 0

Pressure to use genAI for #ECR is quite high, I feel it weekly... ethical, ecological, economical, privacy- and cognitive-related worries keeps me from joining that ship.
I need more time to research not something that creates the illusion of reasoning, if that costs grants or positions, let it be.

1 month ago 8 2 1 1
Advertisement
Preview
"My First Pull Request": A Beginners Guide to Open Source with PsychoPy Make your first pull request and learn how to get started in the world of Open Source Projects!

Want to learn how to contribute to #opensource? 👩‍💻👨‍💻

Never used #Git before?

Join us for our free beginner-friendly workshop and learn the basics of contributing to open source projects like #psychopy

🗓 March 19th
⏰ 12:00 PM (UK time)

Everyone is welcome 🚀
www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/my-first-p...

1 month ago 9 13 0 1
Post image

Based on our WhereToPublish database, we were curious to see if the APCs depend on the publisher type and with relatively no surprise at all, the journals that are for-profit are way above:
For-profit journals = 2635 +/- 37€ (mean +/- sem)
Non-profit & University Press journals = 1996 +/- 63€
1/4

1 month ago 7 4 2 0
Where to Publish?

Dear all, I'm happy to present you a side project done with @diegoharta.bsky.social @phylogenetrips.bsky.social & Lucas Baudouin regarding the publication landscape in Biology: wheretopublish.github.io 1/4

2 months ago 14 7 1 4