and suspicion. Changing that presumption is as important as changing the payment rate. Irish Equity will press for both.

Irish Actors’ Equity 2nd April 2026

30 of 30

and it demands better. The trust artists are being asked to place in this scheme demands more in return than audit trails and repayment threats.

Ireland has talented artists. It also has a State that struggles to believe they deserve support without conditions, surveillance,

29 of 30

is this: We will encourage our members to apply. We will also continue to say clearly and publicly that 2,000 places from a professional artist population many times larger is not a cultural policy - it is a waiting list. The evidence in the reports commissioned by the State demands more,

28 of 30

An Equity member who accepts a six-month contract in London or a production in New York should not have to choose between that work and their BIA payment. The Irish performing arts sector depends on international mobility. This clause, as written, penalises it.

Irish Equity’s position

27 of 30

‘Primarily Based in Ireland’ Will Cost Performers Their Careers

The requirement to remain primarily based in Ireland for three years, with no definition of ‘primarily,’ creates an unquantifiable compliance risk for performers whose professional lives require international mobility.

26 of 30

consequences onto the individual.

This flaw was identified during the pilot. It remains unaddressed. Irish Equity demands a full DSP means-test disregard for BIA income across all social welfare schemes. Anything less makes the scheme regressive by design.

25 of 30

€325 per week Basic Income for the Arts 2026–2029
— in some cases, near zero. The guidelines’ answer to this “problem” is to advise applicants to investigate their own position. This is the same State that engineered the problem, is refusing to solve it, and is redirecting the

24 of 30

The Department of Social Protection Interface Punishes the Poorest Artists Twice
Yet again BIA income will be means-tested against existing social welfare entitlements. For artists on Disability Allowance, Carer’s Allowance, or Jobseeker’s, the net gain will be substantially less than

23 of 30

The burden of proof rests on the artist. That is the grammar of suspicion, applied to the most vulnerable applicants in the pool.

Equity demands the repayment clause be removed. The compliance burden must be proportionate. The presumption must be good faith, not guilt.

22 of 30

preventing fabricated evidence - is reasonable. But the clause as drafted makes no distinction between fraud and ordinary assistive use: grammar tools, drafting support, accessibility software for applicants with dyslexia or language needs. The default assumption is misuse.

21 of 30

never dream of imposing on a corporate tax relief recipient or a Section 481 beneficiary.

The BIA scheme, for all its genuine ambitions, has inherited that class bias reflex.
The prohibition on AI use in applications is a small but telling example. The intent -

20 of 30

medical reviews, that treats social welfare recipients as a fraud risk until proven otherwise. The Irish State has a long and well-documented reflex: when it gives money to people who need it, it extracts a toll of surveillance, documentation, and suspicion that it would

19 of 30

overnance. It is punitive administration directed at people the State has already identified as economically precarious.

This pattern is not new. It is the same logic that imposes jobseeker’s compliance regimes on people without work, that subjects disability claimants to repeated

18 of 30

and - most revealingly - the threat of repayment if removed from the scheme on administrative grounds.

An artist who falls ill, who misses a filing deadline, who fails to complete a survey, faces a demand to return income already spent on rent and materials. This is not proportionate

17 of 30

annual re-verification of eligibility, mandatory survey completion on pain of removal, Form 11 submission, continuous audit exposure, evidence requirements for every activity declared in a survey, identity shared with third-party organisations without the recipient’s ability to refuse,

16 of 30

and class prejudice into the compliance requirements of this scheme, and it should concern every artist, every trade union, and every citizen who believes the State owes its people a basic presumption of good faith.

The compliance requirements in these guidelines is extensive:

15 of 30

and timeline for rolling the scheme out for all artists, or a clear explanation as to why they are choosing to ignore their own research.

The State, Once Again, Treats People in Need as People to Be Policed
The answer to the last question lies in the way the Department has baked inequality

14 of

turned away by lottery.

The State has accepted the evidence for the payment’s value while declining to fund it at the scale that evidence demands. That is a political choice, not a fiscal necessity, and it must be named as such. Equity calls on the government to set out their plans

13 of 30

€1.39 in social value for every €1 invested. And yet this successor scheme maintains the same cap at 2,000 places and the same €325 weekly payment below the living wage, not indexed to inflation, and unreachable by the majority of eligible artists who will apply and be

12 of 30

The Evidence Justifies Expansion. The Budget Refuses It.

The pilot clearly demonstrated that stable income improves artistic output, wellbeing, and sector retention. The Department’s own cost-benefit analysis claimed that the scheme produced

11 of 30

educational privilege rather than dismantling it. It ignores the fact that many artists are developing their talent and building their careers outside formal education structures because those structure inaccessible or unaffordable.

10 of 30

institutional structures. They do not reflect the actual artist population. Irish Equity calls for these requirements to be redesigned before the next round goes live.

The Recently Graduated stream, offering 100 places to Level 8 graduates only, is a token that reproduces

9 of 30

systematically exclude artists with interrupted careers, community-based or interdisciplinary practices, commercial performing backgrounds, and work that falls outside the recognised and outdated artform categories set out in the Arts Act. The proof requirements mirror the existing

8 of 30

The Proof Requirements Screen Out the Artists Who Need It Most

Three proofs of professional practice, weighted toward Arts Council awards and establishment sector activity. This is not a test of artistic quality. It is a test of how institutionally embedded the applicant is - and it will

7 of 30

political attack, and obscures what the scheme actually does. Irish Equity calls on the Department to adopt an honest name and call this scheme what it actually is – a version of labour activation, or a version of a CE scheme.

6 of 30

This scheme is none of those things. It is a competitive, lottery-allocated, heavily audited professional support grant capped at 2,000 recipients. The new guidelines confirm that eligibility does not confer entitlement. Calling it a basic income misleads artists, invites

5 of 30

representing highly trained and qualified people working in a structurally precarious sector, Irish Equity cannot ignore this blatant prejudice.

It Is Not a Basic Income, so Stop Calling It One!

A basic income is unconditional, universal, and non-competitive.

4 of 30

The answer, once again, is with suspicion disproportionate to the risk, with administrative burdens designed for the benefit of the institution rather than the recipient, and with a scale of ambition that falls well short of the evidence the State itself has commissioned. As a Union

3 of 30

acknowledgement by the State that artistic labour has public value and delivers real gains. These are all important outcomes.

Unfortunately, the guidelines published today are also a document about power -specifically, about how the Irish State chooses to treat people in economic need.

2 of 30

Basic Income for the Arts 2026 -2026.
An Important Step. A Missed Opportunity.

Irish Actors’ Equity welcomes the establishment of the Basic Income for the Arts a permanent scheme. This gives participants multi-annual certainty, gives policy makers a solid research base, and is a formal

🧵 1 of 30