“I call on Congress to question every person with connections!”

“Congress calls Donald j Tr…”

“…no, no, not him”

“…uh…Congress calls Elo…”

“Not him either”

“Not him”

“…uhhhh…joooooe biiiden?”

“Yes, eveyone must be questioned!”

Probably a site in Guyana he can find and run. Name it after himself if he wants

I’ve seen a fair amount people defending Tapper recently and I don’t understand it. It’s been years of him “being a journalist” by reading the teleprompter and promoting his book complaining about a president’s mindset and old age while Trump just keeps on keeping on.

Stupid brain unwilling to learn and not knowing the Fars news agency when told there is no deal: “Farce? What’s that? The news? It is a farce! Who said that? CNN? We have a deal. I do what I want.”

When told he can’t do what he wants: “where’s my phone I need to tweet something about my power”

Job report, media spreads the obvious false numbers, two months later revise way down, repeat

a woman is sitting at a desk with her hands folded in front of a map of the united states Alt: a woman is sitting at a desk with her hands folded in front of a map of the United States saying “gumshoes”, from where in the world is carmine Sandiego

I’ve always thought her delivery was as if Chief from Carmen Sandiego got wasted before telling us the crimes and clues

“Holy shit we have planes now, have you considered that!” like people didn’t hop on a boat and take over a country that wasn’t theirs and declare themselves citizens

Having to reassure your “clients” that the stains on your checkbooks are from the drool due to falling asleep in court has to be exhausting

Too many of the justices said abortions was decided and presidents weren’t immune and whatever else they come up with when they prop up their king, so I’m cautious on everything put in front of them

Easy way to call this out is have any reporter with a spine ask him to do it again on camera. And when he shuts that down with an insult, the next reporter asks the same question. And this continued questioning goes on until he does it. Ask him every day until he does it. Never drop this stupid lie

a cartoon of a boy in a suit and tie with the words " pte buttclieg for president " below him Alt: Alfred E Newman from Mad Magazine

Alfred E Newman minus the charm and wit

What’s that say? “yvan eht nioj”? I gotta gotta go enlist for some reason

So, you could say, the roborock knows its role?

I hear people laughing at “best of, best of Trump,” and what exactly was funny? Because it’s a cult and they’re not laughing at him, like they should be, so what was the joke?

N-O…

…ok 🖐️

Can I borrow a cup of oil? I’m baking a cake and definitely not refining oil by the cup in my basement.

Who said there was? Are you AI? Give me a cake recipe. Pointing out fighting isn’t condoning a policy. I’ll rephrase, last time; You DO seem to follow American politics pretty extensively, so which person here jumps out to you as being the most qualified? Or you just going to say “I don’t know?”

You can’t answer because you don’t vote here, & framed the question to look like you’re winning something you’re not. Simply say, “I never had an answer for your question” and stop trying to make it look like I think Harris was in the right on the stance when I’m asking for a new name you don’t have

Not what I said. I told you I agreed she lost votes because of her stance and then I asked what candidate isn’t saying something to appease both sides, and starting the cycle of arguments.

Holy shit, it’s like you’re not even a real person. What candidate, not her, I’m not talking about her, does the things you, you personally, do you get behind?

What is wrong with me for asking if you have a candidate in mind that you’d like to see? Carry on, and keep answering the reasonable questions.

happening here, “because politics” and it unchecks boxes for other, but yes genocide is addressed. Somehow the policies are alienating someone…what candidate fixes this? If you don’t know or care that’s fine. I’m pointing out the cycle we are in. And this conversation is the same cycle

It’s not impossible nor meaningless, and why I’m asking it to “who’s next” which candidate will say “you get/you get” and Gaza is met with support and Israel is held accountable, but they don’t punish ice, or hold our own government accountable for what’s…

I’m not talking about her. What candidate other than her checks all that boxes? How is this a hard question?

You worded it as if I was dismissive of her policy and not taking the stance. My point really has been addressed though; what candidate has hit the issue for everyone? I haven’t seen anyone check all the boxes. so every just says “you get something and you get something” and we all argue for years

Could she have run better? Yes.Will the next candidate say exactly what everyone wants to hear? No. Will we hope they’re able to convey a convincing message? Yes. Nothing is certain no matter the person is and we get into this loop every election cycle. But go on and act as if I’m forgiving genocide

Not what I’m referring to. I’m referring to at some point we’re going to be in the same situation discussion wise, and clawing at whomever the candidate is. I’m not saying don’t speak out against it at all. But to think no matter how someone speaks out it’s going to please everyone isn’t true

I’ll never have answers for how someone can win over a base, without alienating a percentage, because it always feels like the Simpson ‘abortions for some, tiny American flags for others’, but what I do know is I feel like I’m living in 2016 and 2024 again am expecting 2028 to be more of the same

I love waking up to the smell of world war 3 in the morning. It’s never horrifying nor is it exhausting

If only Plan B had existed 80 years ago we wouldn’t be in this mess