TL;DR there is a role for you in this work that is at a pace you can handle. Find your lane.

If any of you EVER INTENTIONALLY MISGENDER SOMEONE, or think that is okay in some instances

Unfollow and block me now please.

That is never okay. Mistakes? Mistakes happen, I make mistakes. It's no big deal. I've even called my cat by the wrong name!

Intentional misgendering is violence.

Bruh, if you’re easily impressed by $2 margaritas and the less-than-half a calorie it takes to open a door I think you could find a man too.

Also, why casually admit that no one thinks you’re worth fighting over or for like that? ☠️

“People are saying they are grifters” followed by quoting an account saying it.

Is the account a reliable source of information?
Did you attempt to verify their claims to ascertain whether it was truthful before repeating/sharing them?

AltNPS seems to be pretty transparent on their website.

If you believe you have a better strategy, why don’t you share it with the rest of the class? Better yet, become a leader and demonstrate its effectiveness.

Being a critic contributes nothing if your proposal is a losing strategy you feel good about when other people’s livelihoods are on the line.

Leslie Halligan, District Court Judge Fourth Judicial District Missoula County Courthouse 200 West Broadway Missoula, Montana 59802 (406) 258-4771 MONTANA FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, MISSOULA COUNTY SUSAN EDWARDS; MONTANA TWO SPIRIT SOCIETY; KAEL FRY; ANNA TELLEZ; EDEN ATWOOD; SHANNON ALOIA, Plaintiffs, v. THE STATE OF MONTANA; GREG GIANFORTE, in his official capacity as GOVERNOR OF MONTANA, AUSTIN KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MONTANA, Defendants. Dept. No. 1 Cause No. DV-23-1026 ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This matter comes before the Court on opposing motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, II, & III (“Motion”) seeks to declare Senate Bill 458 as facially unconstitutional. Defendants’ (collectively, the “State”) Motion for Summary Judgment seeks to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims arguing the absence of a case or controversy. The Court has considered both motions, the parties’ supporting and opposing briefs, and the

Major news! A court in Montana has just declared SB458, a bill that "defines sex" in a way that ends the legal recognition of transgender people in Montana, as facially unconstitutional.

This is the first time a bill defining sex has been ruled on!

Huge win for trans people in MT!

I envy that you have a representative that isn’t a waste of taxpayer money.