Any president who reintroduces the racist and reactionary anti-immigrant bill Harris proposed in a pathetic (and failed) attempt to outflank trump should be tarred and feathered and thrown into the Potomac.
We do have agency, which we demonstrate in part by withholding our vote from the reactionary capitalist and imperialist candidates put forth by the two dominant political parties.
That is one of the main reasons people who align with Hassan do not support the Democratic Party candidate for president: the Democratic party establishment is actively hostile to leftist politics and tries to co-opt, marginalize, or destroy anyone who dares to challenge them from the left.
It is rather disingenuous to say you’d rally around a candidate from “the Bernie/AOC wing“ because that would NEVER happen. The DNC’s explicit mission is to co-opt or destroy any candidate who has a progressive or socialist political agenda, just like they did to Sanders and AOC.
Olivia Reingold was baiting Abdul El-Sayed by asking the
extremely disingenuous question "does Israel have a right to exist as a Jewish state?" What she is really asking is should Israel be allowed to engage in apartheid and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians without any consequences.
Who cares? This discussion is not about Bernie Sanders. The fact that you want to change the subject is just further proof that she has accomplished NOTHING aside from being a warm body who blindly supports party leadership.
The type of accomplishments I’m looking for are legislative actions that materially improve the lives of poor and working people, which is what Ms. Turner promised to fight for, and not just a warm body whose only agenda is to maintain the status quo and blindly support party leaders.
So the answer is no, she has not accomplished anything in congress.
An imperial military threatening to carry out mass murder is not a “distraction”.
Aside from getting elected, what are her accomplishments? I have read every bio and I have yet to find a single one.
That is her only accomplishment?
Has ‘this lady’ done anything of note?
What is your definition of a ‘Useful Idiot’? Anyone who disagrees with you? One of the most Useful Idiots in world history is @kamalaharris.com. She is a demonstrably unqualified candidate who monopolized the 2024 nomination process, only to lose to Donald Trump.
Sounds like you are just Jealous Again
A year ago, the brain dead Democratic party donor class was obsessed with the idea of finding a ’liberal Joe Rogan’. Now many of those same dunderpates are saying that Hasan Piker is one of the biggest problems democrats face in the midterms.
You are describing your own behavior.
“This beautiful God Bless The USA Bible has been custom embossed in a gold foil to commemorate the 45th & 47th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.”
The present generation is saying the United States and other colonizer countries should stop waging criminal wars of aggression, even if our modern criminal wars of aggression kill and maim fewer people than the wars of the past.
The Democratic Party octogenarian caucus is so addicted to hoarding power that they can’t even imagine life without it.
“Not only does Clyburn intend to retire, he seems offended by the mere mention of the idea.… ‘What do you want—me to give up my life?’”
The United States used to mock the Soviet Union for having “elderly” leaders in their 50s and 60s. Now the Democratic party sycophants cry bigotry when someone suggests the senile and dementia-addled octogenarians who have had a stranglehold on power for decades should consider retiring.
Every single Democratic Party voter seems to have forgotten what Harris actually campaigned on in 2024.
I forgot, AI is good for three things: mass plagiarism, mass psychosis, and mass death through automation.
"[A]utomated systems, including one called 'Where’s Daddy?'...were used specifically to track targeted individuals and carry out bombings when they had entered their family’s residences.
What AI defenders refuse to reckon with is that while many of the comparison industries you cite do consume a lot of resources, they also provide massive material benefits to society. AI, on the other hand, is only good for two things: mass plagiarism and driving alienated people into psychosis.
I could not even finish this tripe. Like every AI defender, the argument is 'look at how much water these other industries waste!' That's not persuasive to me at all. Those industries should be massively regulated or put out of business as well, especially golf courses. And Phoenix should not exist.
What is your source(s) for your dubious claim that the AI industry’s water use is “insignificant”? And what is your definition of insignificant?
I love how the best defense AI defenders can come up with is ‘a lot of other industries waste water too!’ I‘m willing to bet most people who are critical of the AI industry’s wasting of water also have a problem with golf courses.
