Incredible

Scrolling Bluesky as a soul detox before I go back to hell (Twitter)

It’s over

Lawl

Can’t discourse this on the other app

Ok I unironically should probs start scrolling here more for Econ info huh lmao

They suspended my account on the other app

The tax literature implies you give me MONEY

Happy Juneteenth 🙏🏾

Venmo: Jason-Harrison-79
PayPal: jharrison2156
Cashapp: $jharrison2156
dm if zelle

I miss some of you

The other app and finding a job

How it started/How its going

Yo

Ok I’ll bite, what’s an actual well done IV?

Had a dream where I was accused of academic fraud, went to court, they said my stuff didn’t replicate, I said “that’s because you can’t do what I can do” and then I went to jail

dbcft

Eh

Law friend: “Jesus Christ, is that how Econ seminars are? You guys were grilling them”
Me: That was the most tame seminar we’ve had here

Ah the DSA, very representative organization. Definitely captures the zeitgeist. Surely you can learn deep insights into communities there!

“a bunch of cishet white dudebro faux-progressives having a take on what sounds obnoxious is truly the epitome of irony.”

I was literally the only person that said obnoxious”

This is unreal

“Obnoxious” is something I wrote

You quote something I wrote, then wrote a response

Incredible

“filled to the brim with contrarian cishet white dudebros” is just my experience in college an, no, I did not start talking like that

No, they don’t talk like that because people don’t normally talk like that

Barely on this app -> opens app -> gets called white

I’m closing the app again

I’m not a “cishet white dudebro” but I take more offense to the “progressive” part

They do this rhetoric across the board and RW media outlets run away with any clip they can find you moron

It’s a *signal*, and someone is critiquing it off of what it *implies* as well as what it is

Separately, given the current set of Dems, asking that question is basically stupid anyways

How about a “we can believe in and acknowledge how racism etc. plays a role in socio-economic outcomes without sounding obnoxious to people”

Would be a good start IMO, idk, maybe too risky

You can’t analyze the statement in isolation, obviously the context of the time matters.

This same statement is less costly in a different political environment. What’s being is argued is you need to.. get back to that environment

If people aren’t very political and don’t internalize the process then optics matters a lot

This is just obviously true. You can do things and it not matter. Dems already have people viewing them a certain way right now, you’re setting off the wrong signals by doing this

It’s all so stupid, speaking like this about racism when the black communities in questions don’t even talk like this save for a fraction of elites and college kids

There aren’t even fundamental disagreements, it’s a pure rhetoric thing, waste of time