There are an awful lot of folk getting more upset over the destruction of a white statue than they have been over the destruction of brown people.
Posts by Ben Rosher
"The UK’s restrictions on asylum seekers’ right to work do not appear to act as a strong deterrent, yet they drive up asylum costs..."
✍️ @cbarnard.bsky.social, @fionacostello.bsky.social & Ali Ahmadi ask whether the ban on asylum seekers working actually works
🔗 ukandeu.ac.uk/does-the-ban...
The beatings will continue until morale improves
Just love it when unis try to individualise structural problems
I introduce the concept of the Damoclesian border to demonstrate how bordering practices are maintained through a logic of contingency which inserts vectors of uncertainty into border enactments which hold the potential to unsettle the ontological security of those interpolated as border subjects.
New paper!
academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
What does “taking back control of borders” feel like when you are the one being bordered?
The new EU Pact on Migration and Asylum implies a tactical use of geography and temporality to hamper migrants from getting access to asylum
"The Spatiotemporal Disguises of Asylum" www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... out in @geopoliticsjournal.bsky.social
Video abstracts are a great way to introduce your newest research. Check out Zoë Jay's video abstract for her article: "'If it makes you happy, it can’t be that bad’: Liberal enjoyment and complicity in popular culture."
📺➡️ buff.ly/PUKAza6
Dealer’s choice
Can we at least agree that Paddington should be on every banknote, walking various luminaries into the afterlife
@davidallengreen.bsky.social, would be very interested in an empty city summary of this if you’ve the time.
Whole bunch of academics, charity workers, legal practitioners, and policymakers are gonna end up in jail.
Very silly performative policymaking with no reasonable chance of being operationalised.
So @asanews.bsky.social emailed its membership its refusal to put a petition to Boycott, Divest, & Sanction Israel up to a vote, one that already had 438 signatures. This undemocratic decision, they wrote, is because they're worried about membership dropping.
Well do I have news for you.
He did not
Just so we’re clear:
❌ Travelling clandestinely or in a small boat to seek asylum: wrong
❌ Travelling safely and regularly to seek asylum: also wrong
Really enjoyed reading this article, well worth your time!
Given you can’t even get a quote right I’m guessing you over rely on them
They include it in their AI disclaimer on every assignment. They give me hope for the future.
My takeaway from the latest AI discourse is that the methods bros have spent so long relying on R they’ve forgot they’re supposed to understand at least some fundamentals of research.
Probably in a backlog with the AI peer reviewers
You’ve posted a blog written by AI that tells the reader to spend time locked in a room with AI. And you think this is a good thing?
Even *if* machines could do these jobs better than humans, why would we want them to? If we outsource intellectual curiosity and critical thinking to machines, what is left of the human?
As one of my students frequently tells me, “unbridled convenience rots the soul”
if you think this or are acting upon it you don’t deserve an academic job. people who boast publicly about how they’re too lazy to do their own research and writing and by extension make it harder for anyone else to do it properly are scabs and should be shunned by any serious researchers
It depends if you want to treat migrants as people or resources
No, we need immigration. We are a post-industrial ageing society with an economy almost entirely financed by rent extraction and services.
*also, affordable trains and rivers not full of sewage would be nice.
The problem with Labour is they think immigration is the battleground that they need to win.
All people want is to have a stable job, see a gp, and be able to afford a house.
All else is distraction