Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by 🔥 Rustic Campfire

oh, you still blocking people ) 🤦‍♂️

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

europeans are weak, wicked and spiteful - they don't deserve an army and won't have one.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

your axe is completely rusted

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

yes. some people to disagree with, cause here you're just talking to yourself. pathetic.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

if you tease a bear, and when it finally gets angry, you refuse to give its neighbour a big club to fend it off, while sitting on another continent and lecturing about how bad the bear is, doesn't that make you a disgrace? that's my question.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

will any dems admit they are wrong, i wonder?

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

democrats are not tolerant at all. they only ‘tolerant’ to those who agree with them.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

the masacre in gaza must end

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

it’s amazing that we have elon musk )

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

i think you confused input and output. a being theoretically could be unlimited in their input, perception and understanding, but limited in their output, actions.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

many fairytales ‘explain’ something. maybe even most of them.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

what makes it different from a fairytale then?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

disgusting

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

i’m just saying that this omnipresence of numbers requires explanation.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

we clearly discovered numbers, not invented them.

btw, letter C, you referred to, doesn’t demonstrate such omnipresence

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

every new humans we met were familiar with numbers. moreover, we can’t imagine species of any kind who, let’s say travel to space and don’t know numbers.

this omnipresence of numbers can’t be rationally explained by „species accidentally invent the same thing over and over again”.

1 year ago 0 0 2 0

definitely so. number 3 is an example.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

'science' is equal to 'knowledge we can trust'. every knowledge outside of this set is not trustworthy.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

i mean that number 3 exists regardless of whether anyone or anything perceives or understands it

1 year ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

neither a perceiving system. this number won’t disappear even if there is nothing but rocks around.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

for number 3 to exist no humans, minds or brains are needed.

1 year ago 0 0 2 0

what are bright sights of the religion?

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

can information be created at the first place?

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

and what? kill them all? how’re you going to peacefully coexist with reps?

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

to make dems and reps to talk to each other again.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

lack of pleasures irl? cause if you only talk to the ones who agree, it’s not a discussion but a self-pleasuring.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

mind is a program that runs in the brain

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

an instance of an information is indeed a particular interaction of molecules. the information this instance represents is not.

a song recording or a performance is an interaction of molecules. the song itself is not.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

it’s not clear how information influence physical world. it feels like it does, but physics says that only two things influence physical stuff:
- other physical stuff
- randomness

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

information is a real thing. numbers are real, so is math.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0