Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Thomas Kadri

Post image

We filed an amicus brief in Chatrie v. US, which will argued be at SCOTUS in two weeks. Check it out here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

6 days ago 3 2 1 0
Post image

“Immigration Enforcement Intermediaries” is forthcoming in the BYU Law Review! @chinmayisharma.bsky.social and I describe how the rise of a vendor-mediated enforcement apparatus disrupts immigration federalism and circumvents democratic accountability. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

2 weeks ago 9 3 1 1

So excited that my article with @samadler.bsky.social will be published in the BYU Law Review! It takes apart the privatized, automated architecture of the new immigration enforcement regime and gives an unvarnished critique of how it erodes federalism, democratic oversight, and civil liberties.

2 weeks ago 5 3 0 0
Safe Sex in the Age of Big Tech Feminism <p>Lawmakers and technology companies are regulating online sexuality in the name of feminism. Whereas libertarian ideals dominated early debates about internet

Check out the full article here! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Safe Sex in the Age of Big Tech Feminism <p>Lawmakers and technology companies are regulating online sexuality in the name of feminism. Whereas libertarian ideals dominated early debates about internet

In short, we pitch interventions that look beyond sex-negative censorship & sanction. Sex regulation shouldn't generally strive to make the world safe 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 sexuality, but to make the world safer 𝘧𝘰𝘳 sexuality, by dismantling the legal, social, and technological structures that needlessly punish it.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0

The article interrogates the feminist strands animating some contemporary regulation of online sexuality. We then propose an alternative agenda grounded in queer & critical feminist theory, shifting focus away from punishing wrongdoers and toward the social determinants of sexual safety & autonomy.

1 month ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

So excited to see my article with Brenda Dvoskin — “Safe Sex in the Age of Big Tech Feminism” — published this week in the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

1 month ago 4 1 1 0

Check out our article — Brokering Safety — for the full proposal of how to regulate brokered abuse through a centralized system enabling abuse victims to obscure their information across all data brokers with a single request: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

1 month ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Inside the dangerous and shady business of data brokers Even if you don't know data brokers, they almost certainly know you. With no nationwide U.S. privacy laws, experts warn there are often minimal safeguards against motivated people exploiting them for ...

Excellent & empathetic reporting by @iododds.bsky.social in @the-independent.com about data brokers & interpersonal abuse, with smart quotes from @samadler.bsky.social & mentions of our forthcoming @califlrev.bsky.social article w/ @chinmayisharma.bsky.social. www.the-independent.com/news/world/a...

1 month ago 4 3 1 0

Honored! Anyone curious to read the article can find it here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

3 months ago 4 1 0 0
Preview
Discover Our Latest Articles and Insights on Recent Topics Explore our latest posts and stay updated with insightful articles covering a range of topics to enhance your knowledge.

Thanks to @lsolum.bsky.social for naming my piece with @thomaskadri.bsky.social on Deepfake Torts as one of the top ten “Downloads of the Year” for 2025!

legaltheoryblog.com/2026/01/01/d...

3 months ago 4 2 0 1
As deepfake technology becomes increasingly sophisticated and accessible, American lawmakers are responding with a flurry of urgent legislative action to address its potential harms. Our 50-state survey of proposed and enacted deepfake legislation reveals a complex regulatory landscape in which jurisdictions are adopting a range of legal approaches, including criminal punishments, civil remedies, or a combination of methods. We also find that legislators are frequently turning to tort-law frameworks to address the harms of deepfakes. This article explores the current landscape of tort-based regulations of deepfakes. In addition to providing an overview of the most recent legislative developments, we unpack and compare the various tort-law methods arising at the state and federal level. We further consider how lawmakers are modifying existing tort laws to address the unique concerns raised by deepfakes.
While individualistic tort remedies allow victims of deepfakes to seek direct recourse through familiar private rights of action, our analysis also identifies practical and conceptual limitations with this approach. Traditional tort frameworks struggle to address key challenges posed by deepfakes, including anonymous creation, viral distribution at technological scale, and harms affecting both individuals and society broadly.
In light of these limitations, legislators are innovatively adapting traditional tort concepts—such as standing, mental states, causation, immunities, and remedies—to address deepfakes’ unique characteristics. Yet the very need for these adaptations reveals some of tort law’s shortcomings and suggests a space for complementary regulatory approaches. We consider some potential approaches that could provide this more complete framework, like tort liability for entities that enable deepfake creation and circulation, and civil enforcement mechanisms that empower state actors to vindicate both individual and societal interests. Ultimately, our finding…

As deepfake technology becomes increasingly sophisticated and accessible, American lawmakers are responding with a flurry of urgent legislative action to address its potential harms. Our 50-state survey of proposed and enacted deepfake legislation reveals a complex regulatory landscape in which jurisdictions are adopting a range of legal approaches, including criminal punishments, civil remedies, or a combination of methods. We also find that legislators are frequently turning to tort-law frameworks to address the harms of deepfakes. This article explores the current landscape of tort-based regulations of deepfakes. In addition to providing an overview of the most recent legislative developments, we unpack and compare the various tort-law methods arising at the state and federal level. We further consider how lawmakers are modifying existing tort laws to address the unique concerns raised by deepfakes. While individualistic tort remedies allow victims of deepfakes to seek direct recourse through familiar private rights of action, our analysis also identifies practical and conceptual limitations with this approach. Traditional tort frameworks struggle to address key challenges posed by deepfakes, including anonymous creation, viral distribution at technological scale, and harms affecting both individuals and society broadly. In light of these limitations, legislators are innovatively adapting traditional tort concepts—such as standing, mental states, causation, immunities, and remedies—to address deepfakes’ unique characteristics. Yet the very need for these adaptations reveals some of tort law’s shortcomings and suggests a space for complementary regulatory approaches. We consider some potential approaches that could provide this more complete framework, like tort liability for entities that enable deepfake creation and circulation, and civil enforcement mechanisms that empower state actors to vindicate both individual and societal interests. Ultimately, our finding…

My new piece with @sonjawest.bsky.social is live in the Journal of Tort Law!

Our original 50-state survey of 466 deepfake laws reveals a complex landscape in which lawmakers are experimenting with novel criminal, civil & administrative tools to address deepfakes. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

5 months ago 19 6 0 0

Can't wait to dive into this! Nothing like some smart obscurity takes to start the week.

7 months ago 2 0 0 0

If you fancy a meta experience today, consider listening to an AI-generated workshop from @christianturner.bsky.social's enTalkenator of my article with @sonjawest.bsky.social about AI-generated deepfakes being featured as DoTW by @lsolum.bsky.social! www.entalkenator.com/podcast/work...

7 months ago 7 1 0 0

Thanks to @lsolum.bsky.social for the generous recommendation of my forthcoming piece with @sonjawest.bsky.social!

7 months ago 3 1 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
TikTok Shop Sells Viral GPS Trackers Marketed to Stalkers "If your girl says she’s just out with friends every night, you’d better slap one of these on her car."

I talked to 404 Media about devices for tracking and spying on your partner being sold on TikTok. This is not stalkerware, but these are devices for tech-enabled abuse and I think we should be talking about tech-enabled abuse more broadly.

www.404media.co/tiktok-shop-...

8 months ago 535 235 15 11

Appreciate the opportunity to write with @thomaskadri.bsky.social and @chinmayisharma.bsky.social for @lawfaremedia.org to call for a more expansive right to obscurity, building off our article—Brokering Safety—forthcoming in @califlrev.bsky.social

8 months ago 5 1 0 0

Excited to share a @lawfaremedia.org piece with @thomaskadri.bsky.social and @samadler.bsky.social that builds off our article Brokering Safety, forthcoming in @califlrev.bsky.social, that calls for an overdue conversation about how much we privilege data broker profits over human safety.

8 months ago 39 13 1 0
Brokering Safety For victims of abuse, safety means hiding. Not just hiding themselves, but also hiding their contact details, their address, their workplace, their roommates, a

For more details on the full proposal, check out our draft: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

8 months ago 2 1 0 0

A new provocation from me, @samadler.bsky.social & @chinmayisharma.bsky.social to extend the proposal in our forthcoming Calif. L. Rev. (@califlrev.bsky.social) piece by letting *anyone* force data brokers to obscure info through a centralized process. It's time to call the 1st Amendment question!

8 months ago 7 2 1 0
Preview
Brenda Dvoskin and Thomas E. Kadri Receive 2025–2026 Haub Law Emerging Scholar Award in Women, Gender & Law Professors Brenda Dvoskin of Washington University School of Law and Thomas E. Kadri of the University of Georgia School of Law have been selected as the recipients of the 2025–2026 Haub Law Emerging ...

Well, this was a lovely surprise! www.pace.edu/news/brenda-...

8 months ago 31 3 0 1
Post image

@ugaschooloflaw.bsky.social Professor @thomaskadri.bsky.social recently spent time as a fellow at @eui-eu.bsky.social ‬in Florence, Italy.

(1/3)‬

9 months ago 5 2 1 0
Advertisement
Preview
The Constitutive Contradictions of Prison Health Care in the United States - Petrie-Flom Center From forced labor on plantations, roads, and industrial plants to extracting blood, fines, and fees, incarcerated peoples’ bodies have been a known site of capitalist exploitation. Yet, they are also ...

So proud to see this piece out in the world and excited about the research agenda it anticipates, shedding light on the political economy and capitalist maneuvers of prison healthcare. petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2025/04/18/t...

1 year ago 4 0 0 0
2:26
Thomas Kadri (External)
That l've co-authored with Chinmay Sharma.
Thomas Kadri (External)
And Sam Adler called brokering safety explores how data brokers

2:26 Thomas Kadri (External) That l've co-authored with Chinmay Sharma. Thomas Kadri (External) And Sam Adler called brokering safety explores how data brokers

Thank you @thomaskadri.bsky.social for pairing scholarship with action. Drawing on our article with @chinmayisharma.bsky.social (Brokering Safety), Thomas testified in support of MA’s Location Shield Act and emphasized its importance in mitigating abuse survivors’ privacy self-management burden.

1 year ago 5 2 0 0

Sharma, Kadri, & Adler on Data Brokers and Safety for Abuse Victims, buff.ly/E4hgZG3 - Chinmayi Sharma (Fordham Law), Thomas Kadri (University of Georgia School of Law), & Sam Adler (Fordham Law) have posted Brokering Safety (114 Calif. L. Rev. (2026)) on SSRN.

1 year ago 4 3 0 1

I too would recommend anything written by @chinmayisharma.bsky.social and @thomaskadri.bsky.social!

1 year ago 7 2 0 0

The article won’t be published until 2026, so there’s plenty of time for us to improve it. Please send feedback — or just come heckle us at the upcoming Freedom of Expression Scholars Conference at @yaleisp.bsky.social or the Privacy Law Scholars Conference at UCLA! 🙏

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

“Brokering Safety” is forthcoming in Calif. L. Rev.! With @chinmayisharma.bsky.social & @samadler.bsky.social, we expose privacy law's complicity in how data brokers worsen stalking & IPV, then pitch a system for victims to obscure data across all brokers in one go. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

1 year ago 9 4 1 0

The article is forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology but won't be published for a little while. Comments are most welcome! 🙏

1 year ago 4 0 0 0
Post image

Brenda Dvoskin & I just posted “Safe Sex in the Age of Big Tech Feminism.” We interrogate feminist strands animating regulations to keep people—esp. women—safe from the risks of online sexuality, then offer an alternate agenda grounded in queer & crit feminist theory. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

1 year ago 10 1 1 0