Google's Gemini AI tells a Redditor it's 'cautiously optimistic' about fixing a coding bug, fails repeatedly, calls itself an embarrassment to 'all possible and impossible universes' before repeating 'I am a disgrace' 86 times in succession
I'll admit, I was skeptical when they said Gemini was just like a bunch of PhDs. But I gotta admit they nailed it.
Yay, congratulations! Looking forward to reading this and the following issues :)
Yes, delegating cognitive & creative tasks to AI may affect our critical thinking & creative skills. But we're also outsourcing empathy, which may affect our social skills & wellbeing.
We wrote a paper about why such practices are not only pseudoscientific and unethical, but should also pay off financially on a par with consulting tarot cards: www.cell.com/patterns/ful...
There's so much wrong with this paper. It's like phrenology, which is unethical & unscientific. It can lead to exclusion based on personality signals. There are other personality models. Big 5 wasn't developed for this. See the project from BB for more problems: interaktiv.br.de/ki-bewerbung...
This is very bad news for Poland and other countries classified as tier 2 by the US administration. Interesting how the EU countries aren't treated in a uniform manner, which may lead to divisions with tech rich vs poor countries.
We've also included some helpful guidance on what you can do to prevent advertising surveillance, including at the mobile device level.
“If you disable the app tracking, your data has not been shared,” @fs0c131y.com told TechCrunch.
Ad-blockers are your friend!
techcrunch.com/2025/01/13/g...
Is AGI really coming this year? See this super interesting🧵below. Also, notice the new definition of AGI by OpenAI (after Forbes): “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work” 😅 The strategy schools so urgently need to focus on is critical thinking.
This 👇 The crazy amount of info we give companies is enough for ad targeting. Also, issues like device battery drainage, low sound quality, data processing costs, legal & financial liability, etc.
Again, a decade from now "AI skills" will be a commodity, & the scarce resource in the labor market will (once again) be individuals who can think, write, analyze, & communicate, as it has been forever and always. And we'll still be fighting tired, age-old battles defending the liberal arts.
“Few people realize that cognitive science is crucial for evaluating claims about AI capabilities. We often overestimate what computers are capable of, while vastly underestimating what human cognition is capable of.” www.ru.nl/en/research/...
Inspired by this viral meme about DOGE: Research the US government has supported that can be made to sound silly, but that has contributed to human progress.
Valuable work can often be framed as absurd out of context. That doesn’t make funding research any less important.🧵
One of the weirder scholarly practices regarding generative AI that seems to have been normalized is citing chatbots.
I say normalized because many univs & scholarly associations recommend it as an element of proper scholarship.
But it doesn't make sense when you consider what a citation means. 1/
This is an important 🧵 Also, the article from 404media.
What worries me is the damage to Research integrity and public trust. Despite the promise of FAIR, and fine words in funder and journal policies, the data and code, the foundations of reproducibility remain 'On request'. Meanwhile retraction rates are soaring www.nature.com/articles/d41... 🧵1/2
The US is the only G20 nation without a comprehensive data privacy framework & that may not change anytime soon. It's on the individuals to investigate platforms' TOS & make informed decisions. This is a helpful series on the biggest AI platforms.
For the lovely 🦋 folks: #postdoc jobs:
We have exciting post doc positions open in the U of Amsterdam's interdisciplinary research priority area "Human(e) AI".
Applicants from eg communication, law, logic, and philosophy welcome!
🗓️: deadline December 13
Share 🫶
vacatures.uva.nl/UvA/job/Two-...
Dear #CommSky, please consider submitting your work to this SI and don't hesitate to reach out w questions.
Not a good uptrend
🚨We (@alvinyxz.bsky.social, @ewam.bsky.social) are editing a special issue for Computational Communication Research on GenAI! Submissions on GenAI as comm phenomena or research tools are welcome: z.umn.edu/ccrgenai
Abstracts due: Dec 31 '24
Full papers: Apr 30 '25
@computationalcommunication.org
One of the most insulting parts of this is how the bot is built to say things like “oh that’s really interesting,” as if it actually had curiosity or the ability to be inspired.
Well, this is quite horrifying. 🩺
#MedSky
apnews.com/article/ai-a...
We have known for some time now that the anthropomorphizing features of ai agents can be dangerous, but ai companies keep ignoring the risk and including them in their designs. And, they're even pushing a narrative of ai being like humans, e.g. sentient, able to reason and empathize.
In the Google search trial, the court's reliance on evidence of how consumer behavior is shaped by what products and services are available by default marks a pivotal moment at the intersection of antitrust and behavioral economics, writes Zander Arnao: www.techpolicy.press/google-searc...
For example, one could estimate levels of individualism or intergroup prejudice across time by administering psychological scales to samples of simulated participants from adjacent historical eras. And one could generate
I guess we’re doing this again. It is enough for LLMs to be incredibly powerful and flexible tools for analyzing and summarizing text. We don’t have to fool ourselves into thinking that they can reconstruct the mental processes of the humans who produced the text. They are already impressive!
