Posts by François Diaz-Maurin
Sad. The vast majority of Jews living outside Israel reject Netanyahu's policy of forever war and war crimes. Plus, Netanyahu will continue using attacks against Jews to justify his policy.
"There should be no mystery why younger Americans are as pro-Palestinian today as their forebears were once pro-Israeli. Rabin staked his life on peace. What will posterity say of Netanyahu?" My column on why America is falling out of love with Israel. www.ft.com/content/353e...
I think I'm going to start an #aptonym collection. I've seen too many.
So this is #1:
"In April 2025, one of Russia’s satellites, believed to be connected to this mission, appeared to be “spinning uncontrollably” and may no longer be operational (Roulette 2025)."
"President's Trump's disdain for the rules is endangering world order in many ways," write Frank N. von Hippel and Seyed Hossein Mousavian.
"We cannot leave defense of the nonproliferation regime for later, however. If we do, we may find ourselves in a nuclear-armed crowd."
I guess, 99 percent of voters will be fine with surtaxing the super rich.
(Plus, the trickle-down economy has also been perverted for decades due to tax optimization by the super rich.)
Go pied-à-terre tax.
Some are freaking out: "if New York drives away more wealth, voters won’t like the result of living in a city that’s downwardly mobile."
But the argument that taxes make rich people flee in mass has been debunked for years. It only serves to defend an unjust status quo.
Where we learn that only one third of @alphaville.ft.com readers—and 22 percent for @financialtimes.com—is under 35.
It's 46 percent for @thebulletin.org, baby! 😎
thebulletin.org/about-us/ann...
Merci pour votre travail, quotidien !
C'est drôle d'être en train d'écouter votre chronique et de voir le post en même temps. 🙂
Washington is right to demand strong non-proliferation guarantees from Iran, writes Olamide Samuel @olamidediy.bsky.social.
But, it must treat the institutions that make these guarantees credible as something more than disposable tools.
Washington is right to demand strong non-proliferation guarantees from Iran. But it must treat the institutions that make these guarantees credible as something more than disposable tools, Olamide Samuel (@olamidediy.bsky.social) writes.
#Iran #NPTRevCon #NPT #nukesky #Trump
Last week, I wrote about how Zohran Mamdani is clearly having FUN as mayor—and treating his public service as the gift it is. There’s an important lesson here: www.doomsdayscenario.co/p/the-pure-j...
Same anti-youth rethoric often used in Europe, too.
Just in case you want to rehearse: www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSqi...
Did you know there was even a "Nuclear Winter" karaoke?
Well, now you know. And you can impress your friends at your next weekend party.
I asked experts in November 2024 what to expect from Trump’s second term.
Their response: more erratic, darker, and more dangerous
On April 22, join the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists as we explore how AI may lead to a hollowing out of experience, and eventually to a crisis of leadership.
Register now for our upcoming virutal program: buff.ly/Fxr0FHQ.
Hope I'm wrong.
So they even could have some HEU over 60% somewhere since even before June 2025. I doubt even intelligence services would know that. Iran still hasn't explained publicly the traces of 84% enriched uranium, although the IAEA hasn't commented on that either I agree.
That was before the first June strikes. Since then they have no clue since no access. I am talking about what happened between June 2025 and February of this year. Nobody knows what Iran's intentions are. One way or the other.
Yes I am not saying it's the most probable scenario. But even the starting point is unknown. I mean the IAEA itself says it had lost continuity of knowledge for a period of about one year, and that this loss is irreducible.
The IAEA had monitoring systems at facilities. Intelligence agencies don't.
Yes. My assessment is that HEU at 60 might have entered Isfahan in early June. And until February it's enough time to have a cascade running there before closing the entrances. Nobody knows the status of the enrichment facility at Isfahan.
Blocking the Strait is not deterrence, it's leverage. Iran is still under attack.
To me the uranium situation has been unchanged since at least mid-February when Iran backfilled all tunnel entrances at Isfahan. So they could make that offer before the war.
Haven't heard the new Ayatollah saying the same.
Plus, the IAEA detected traces of uranium enriched at 84% in 2022. Was never explained publicly by Iran.
Yes but we live in a post-JCPOA world since 2018 already. Hard to believe Iran would go back to these conditions willingly. Especially now that it lost its deterrence power.
Whatever the final agreement—if any, and even if worse than the 2015 JCPOA—it must include allowing the IAEA access to the Isfahan underground complex.
That's the most pressing nuclear issue right now.