If you read the thread carefully, it was actually OPs argument.
Posts by Adam Blazowski
I don't think so. How did you calculate the economics of seasonal storage on batteries? These are not linear relationships.
Where in the world can you see batteries used for seasonal storage? Examples?
Fuel prices are a small part of the operation costs, so if PWRs can achieve other benefits they are better.
What a way to become a global meme!
One does not disqualify the other.
Its you who wants to limit African choices.
Easy for you to say living in a country with a fixed grid and all the benefits and wealth it provides.
youtu.be/gKiCyFdPcYA?...
You should try living like this. This diagram is a disaster for people who need to live without a grid
I will block you if you continue the habit of namecalling.
You should try living without a grid with solar alone yourself instead of telling Africans what is good for them
The grid serves everyone and is needed all the time. So project that do not pay for it are parasitic. Everyone should pay grid fees lest its cost will drop on the poor who do not own roof or land.
It is a negative social transfer.
You are compleetly oblivious of the exustence of distribution charges which actually have a much higer impact on the final electricity price.
This is why LCOE is useless in quest to design affordable low carbon grid.
LCOE is a metric for the investor, not a consumer or grid planner. Electricity is not a commodity but essensial social service.
This Green neoliberal chatter is removed from realities of power engineering.
That was quick ;)
Of course, Denmark is a small country with plenty of energy storage in Norway, close by.
All the at the expense of Norwegian consumers who see their prices explode when there is not enough wind in Denmark and Germany.
www.euractiv.com/news/norway-...
It is a deliberate attempt at dissinformation to promote genereration technologies one is in favour off.
You are, probably deliberatly, confusing wholesale prices with household electricity prices.
There is a lot of dissinformation in this area and sadly your post is example of it
Oh, so now you are against geothermal and hydro?
German Left: "We don't need nuclear power".
Polish Left: "One plant is not enough. We need 8, and at least 2 should be in my constituency".
This proposal is compleetly econonically unsound, transporting liquid H2 which boils of on the way, it is bonkers idea. Also burning H2 for electricity is a waste, with round trip efficiency of 30%-40% while H2 is much more needed in decarbonizing fertilizers and steel.
So first you write falsehoods, accuse me of being "nuclear propagandist", I prove you wrong with facts, and you respond with "fine".
Why do you feel it necessery to get so personal in a discussion?
This is funny.
Exgas consultant Green energy minister TvdS in Belgium LITERARLY negotiated MASSIVE CRM subsidies for burning natural gas with the EU Comission.
Please do wake up to the historical facts.
Razem is the most proEU and antinationalistic ever.
Please do educate yourself before making ridiculous and ignorant judgments.
partiarazem.pl
Nice CGI. Any article talking about maritime transporting liquified H2 can be easily dismissed as fantasy.
Pleaee come back when a real projevt like this is implemebted and profitable
This is from formerly antinuclear DPP leader:
www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-as...
This was unthinkable 2 years.
In many countries support for nuclear is over almost the whole political spectrum: US, UK, Poland, Sweden, several others. Italy will follow, especially after this oil crisis that makes balancing renewables with natural gas very costly.