Advertisement Β· 728 Γ— 90

Posts by DoubleDelight πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦πŸ•ŠοΈ

MauriTANia

1 day ago 5 0 1 0

What? Come again?

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

Disappointed, for some reason, that Brazil isn't bright yellow.

2 days ago 4 0 0 0

...or how dirty the mirror/sink is in the ubiquitous mirror-selfie

2 days ago 3 0 0 0

As long as they don't talk about their past.

...as that's tense.

2 days ago 10 0 1 0

They never are... πŸ’…πŸΌ

2 days ago 6 0 0 0
Post image

Genuinely thought this:

3 days ago 7 0 0 0

Like hens teeth.

3 days ago 1 0 0 0

That sucks 😞

3 days ago 0 0 0 0

This feels like an adjacent solution to the Infinite Hotel problem πŸ€™πŸΌ

3 days ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

He probably ended up on Grindr

3 days ago 10 0 0 0

You're wrong. It's you that is mixing categories.

Biological sex is different to gamete production.

Humans are evolved to be more than reproductive organisms, with the definition being a combination of chromosomes, hormones and genetics.

DSDs account for millions of people, hardly disorders.

4 days ago 1 0 2 0

And so to be a woman, you need to possess these functioning reproductive organs?

4 days ago 0 0 0 0

You seem to be purposefully opaque on your classification though, which is where you started.

If there exists humans they do not fall under your definition, then the definition fails right?

- both sexual genitalia
- no functioning reproductive sexual organs
etc...

4 days ago 0 0 0 0

This is a mean map

4 days ago 2 0 0 0

If you met her in real life, would you deck her? 🀜🏻

4 days ago 1 0 0 0

And here we arrive at the issue.

I agree with you that science uses characteristics to classify organisms. It's literally how science works.

But the characteristics need to be present for ALL. No 'exceptions'.

That's a classification system.

That's why your tomato belongs in a fruit salad.

4 days ago 0 0 0 0

Is this also called ghosting?

4 days ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Come again?

4 days ago 3 0 0 0

So for those born with both reproductive organs, how do they fit with your classification?

5 days ago 1 0 0 0

The problem with your statement, is that it's an absolute.

Biological facts in this regard aren't absolute.

We can play this game if you like and you'll see how quick your statement no longer fits the facts.

Gender is a social construct.

Biological sex isn't a one-size-fits-all, and is nuanced.

5 days ago 1 0 0 0

Such a shame there's no historic documentation or public accounts of similar events.

5 days ago 49 1 2 0
Preview
Julia set - Wikipedia

😞

Poor attempt at a fractal joke
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_set

6 days ago 1 0 1 0

I can't take seriously a man who piously quotes a Quentin Tarantino script, believing it to be an actual Bible verse.

What a truly ignorant fool.

6 days ago 5 1 0 0

Did you film this in Julia Child's kitchen studio?

Looks like Julia's set.

6 days ago 1 0 1 0

IF I FIND OUT THAT *THIS* IS THE ONE THAT YOU FINALLY SIGNED... πŸ«ͺ

6 days ago 3 0 0 0

Now, come on now.

You think that Melania had the exact same style signature as donald before they met?

How very pathetic of her to copy him.

(or how very telling of him to facilitate her changing to his ECG graph style)

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

I didn't get past the third episode.

Is it worth trying again? It seemed to be a bit of a 'jumpy' narrative.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

*laws may vary depending on your state legislators.

1 week ago 25 0 3 0

I'd still do him ☺️😏

1 week ago 0 0 0 0