Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by toly 🇺🇸

GM!

1 year ago 35 1 11 0

Can blue sky control a session key and sign stuff?

2 years ago 6 0 5 0

This is super cool!

2 years ago 11 1 0 0

gm!

2 years ago 34 0 17 0
Post image

we just launched Solarplex live - a real time communities feed that uses @bsky.app as an open protocol.

you create a community, and all of your posts can now be filtered via that.

we're going to be adding a lot more features to this - our plan is to use @bsky.app to power Solarplex's convos!

2 years ago 38 8 6 3

looks like threads wont actually support activitypub at launch. wonder what their fast follow looks like

techcrunch.com/2023/07/05/adam-mosseri-...

2 years ago 6 1 0 0

A local censorship fault will not be automatically by all the other chains. So it has to be long enough such that all the LPs detect it and exit.

2 years ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Yea. That’s fine. Local amm code takes over the last valid root in exit mode. So all the LPs can exit

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

Nah, you need some timeout. If sequencer posts a different block on every chain, it could double spend and instant exit local coins.

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

I think you can guarantee instant finality by executing locally. But not 100% sure.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

Sequencer signature must work on all chains, so once you have the data locally, you can always post it to the remote. All you need is a sequence number to prove it signed a different block for the same height.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

Just a sequence number for each rollup block will work. The nodes can copy from local chain and post it to the remote at any time since the sequencer already signed it locally.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

Sequencer would have signed conflicting blocks or roots.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

If the data or roots on any of the chains diverge, that’s a fault and a local implementation takes over the last valid root and everyone exits.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

Sequencer X posts all the blocks on N chains. If they don’t include the expected txs, there is a local fault, and the local implementation takes over the root and users can exit. If roots diverge, that’s a fault, etc…

2 years ago 0 0 1 0

It would mirror on all N, each can post txs that must be included. If it ever diverges, there is an attributable fault everyone exits from the last valid root.

2 years ago 1 0 1 0

Why does it need 1 layer instead of N? When there is a fault, each layer only cares about its own tokens, all the remote are worthless.

2 years ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

It could be used to swap eth to sol, stuff like that.

2 years ago 7 0 0 0

Why not a really dead simple L2 that only runs an amm but it’s an L2 in multiple chains. If it’s sequencer fails to include a tx that’s locally posted, a local implementation of the amm takes over the root in exit mode and local coins can exit.

2 years ago 12 1 3 0

Issue a da challenge to fund out

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

gm

2 years ago 15 0 9 0

👋

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

👋

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

What if you need to change gm to GM?

2 years ago 1 0 0 0

gm

2 years ago 11 0 6 0

Gm

2 years ago 12 0 7 0

Gm

2 years ago 16 0 11 0
Advertisement

Gm

2 years ago 11 0 3 0

Gm BlueSky

2 years ago 403 44 141 3