And I'm not saying LLMs are wrong 50% of the time. I'm saying that they're wrong a non-zero % of the time, and that that % - and its impact, on actual humans - is never talked about.

The headline would be "LLM diagnoses 250 cases of lung cancer", but the reality would be "LLM falsely diagnoses lung cancer in 250 patients" or "doctors catch 250 false LLM lung cancer diagnoses."

But we never see those headlines, do we?

Here's a different way of thinking about it: if an LLM assessed 1,000 x-rays and identified 500 cases of lung cancer, would you start those 500 people on chemotherapy? Or would you have a human check it? What if only 250 of them actually had cancer?

How much human time does it take to check whether an LLM-identified bug is really a bug? How many non-bugs were identified that had to be checked and rejected by a human? That's why it matters. And that's never reported.

No, I'm saying that LLMs hallucinate, and therefore there's a non-zero probability they identified "bugs" that weren't bugs. What if this one identified 287 bugs, but identified 10,000 things as bugs that weren't? That wouldn't be so impressive, would it? But they never report the false positives.

Not ever mentioned: how many false positives the LLMs throw up

This "chunky" style looks really good, and the color choices are great

The absolute bone-thudding irony of this comment

Director Joe Russo said "If Doomsday movie thou wilt see, first must thou solve these riddles three"

I don't know, if it's referring to deporting all Reform politicians then I think it's probably accurate

And not just The Lord Of The Rings

youtu.be/DBok-ZxswZI

Interesting article, and I really like that art style

A Hawaiian-themed antique shop in a pixel art style, with the Hawaiian owner and the zombie player character

Added a new location to my point and click adventure game: the An-Tiki shop

#screenshotsaturday #pointandclick #indiegame #solodev #pixelart

When Peter Cook opened The Establishment comedy/satire club in London in the 60s he said he modeled it after "those wonderful Berlin cabarets which did so much to stop the rise of Hitler and prevent the outbreak of the Second World War."

Fair question, it would probably fail the Turing test

Curtis Yarvin is a sentient leather jacket whose understanding of the world is constructed exclusively from the overheard opinions of the 14-year-old boy who's wearing it

The most deranged path about that list is that it implies that life was better before we had pasta, rice, curry etc, but I guarantee that whoever wrote that list happily eats pasta, rice, curry etc and would complain if they ever had to give them up

Again, no you don’t, you publish how far UK MPs stand against the majority view of *anyone with a VPN, anywhere in the world*.

You don't verify citizenship. You don't verify location.

Please stop falsely claiming that this is in any way representative of UK public opinion.

No it doesn’t, it lets *anyone with a VPN, anywhere in the world* vote on every bill.

Please stop falsely claiming that this is in any way representative of UK public opinion.

So you're saying that you don't currently verify them.

So anybody in the world with an email address and a VPN can take your online polls.

Will you make it clear, when you share your poll results, that they aren't representative of the opinion of the UK general public?

Signing up to the site with the VPN set to the US is blocked

Switch the VPN location to the UK and signup is unlocked

Look - I'm not currently in the UK but all I have to do is set my VPN location to UK and voila, signup is all unlocked. So it's a few seconds' effort to skirt the geolock.

How do you verify that the email is owned by a UK citizen or resident?

How do you verify the postcode? Physical mail?

Wait until you hear about VPNs

I listened to the whole interview while cleanmogging my house, and hearing a 20-year-old boy who takes meth and punches himself in the face unwittingly reveal how little he understands about real life to the most patient adult he is ever likely to encounter was just unbearably tragic

How many of those people were UK citizens or residents?

You don't know, because anyone in the world can take your online quizzes

So you're sampling "anyone with an email address and the ability to look up a UK postcode".

I doubt people want stricter verification, I suspect they want you not to pretend that your online quizzes that anyone in the world can take are in any way representative of the attitudes of UK voters

"And always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom"

This list says more about GameRant's readers (specifically their average age) than it does about games

Everyone is laughing at you

I wasn't able to join and there's apparently no recording available.

You say it's "a platform where every UK citizen can vote on every bill and law ever debated in Parliament" - how do you assess whether or not the people signing up to your website and voting in your online polls are UK citizens?

You say that "Houseofthepeople.com is a platform where every UK citizen can vote on every bill and law ever debated in Parliament".

How do you assess whether or not the people signing up to your website and voting in your online polls are UK citizens?