Just pointing out that all of this has come up before. What is obvious now was also obvious back then. www.nytimes.com/2018/01/10/o...
Posts by David Firestone
The triumph of congestion pricing also offers a larger reminder: Government, done right, has immense power to improve people’s lives. Many Americans have grown cynical of government, and they are right to be disappointed about its frequent failure to deliver results in the 21st century. But the answer cannot be allowing the private market and pursuit of profits to dominate American life. Leaders should instead take political risks, as officials in New York did, to create programs that can deliver tangible results.
That congestion pricing is working -- like, really really working! -- is important for the larger effort to restore faith in govt. Take big swings, get big results that people can actually feel. www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/o...
A very early mention of decking the Sunnyside yards. Which says it had been discussed for 25 years prior to that. A century of indecision. So I remain hopeful but skeptical. www.nytimes.com/1951/05/20/a...
“It doesn’t really matter to us what the data shows,” says the union president. But it should matter to Gov. Hochul, who will need every spare MTA dollar.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/13/n...
Urgent issues like New York City’s worsening housing crisis “have gotten far less attention than they deserve in the New York mayoral race,” Mara Gay writes. “Addressing the crisis will require every big idea and drop of political capital the next mayor can muster.”
How appropriate that one of the worst mayors we’ve ever had should endorse one of the worst governors.
These teams consistently did some of the best reporting at the network. 💔
One of the most baldly racist statements ever written by a modern U.S. government official: "The sharp increase in diversity has reduced the level of social trust” essential for democracy. Only refugees who can "fully and appropriately assimilate" should be let in. www.nytimes.com/2025/10/15/u...
Just watched David Firestone’s chilling interview w @nicollewallace.bsky.social. This whole piece is a must read. 🎁🔗: www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/o...
For President Trump, “denying entire chapters of American history is as easy as denying last month’s jobs numbers, and it is no less dangerous to the nation’s understanding of itself,” David Firestone writes.
New op-ed: The Trump administration has made an aggressive effort to rewrite not only its own history but also that of the United States, especially as it is documented in its official museums and cultural artifacts. No shameful narratives are allowed. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/o...
We put together a very visual and mobile-friendly look at how videos shot by people on smarthpones have become a defining way that the public is seeing Trump's immigration crack down.
www.nbcnews.com/specials/tru...
Scene from a low-tax state:
There is no one post or piece that can capture the force that was @tommyrobb.bsky.social, but my colleagues and I at @thecity.nyc did our best. Thank you, Tom, for your relentless focus on leaving the world better than you found it, knowing It’s not only possible to change things, but imperative.
New post: As much as Trump's lawyer tried to change the subject, the brazen unconstitutionality of the birthright citizenship order was impossible to ignore at the Supreme Court on Thursday. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/05...
Desperate to deport more immigrants without hearings, the White House is furious that federal judges have blocked all their flimsy legal justifications. Now Trump and Miller want to up the ante by suspending habeas corpus, but that's likely to fail, too. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/05...
New post: Stephen Miller thought he found a way to deport immigrants by claiming Venezuela had invaded the U.S. A federal judge -- Trump's first Latino judicial appointment, back in 2017 -- ruled that there's no invasion going on, demolishing this flimsy pretext. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/04...
New blog post: Which is more astonishing, the rank incompetence of the Trump administration, or the dishonesty revealed by its many mistakes? www.nytimes.com/live/2025/04...
In a single day, Wisconsin voters showed how to beat Trumpism (and Muskism) on a practical level, and Cory Booker showed how on an emotional and moral level. That's the combination Democrats will have to repeat many times over as they begin to take on this fight.
New post at NYT Opinion: Musk has given Wisconsin voters precisely the caricature of a clueless, cheesy billionaire that Democrats could have wished. But tonight we'll find out whether that's enough. Is the mass of voters angry yet about Trump's first 70 days? www.nytimes.com/2025/04/01/o...
Thanks, Anne.
New blog post: Her years of sycophancy discarded in an instant, Elise Stefanik is now paying the price for her dear leader's excesses and incompetence. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/03...
New blog post: The administration's definition of "operational security" means lying, sneering, and stonewalling to change the clear nature of reality. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/03...
The Trump White House doesn't care about free speech, the NYT editorial board writes. It prioritizes far-right ideology — celebrating lies and hate speech — "while simultaneously trying to silence independent thought, inconvenient truths and voices of dissent."
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/28/o...
The corrupt Adams deal "is the clearest example yet of this administration’s efforts to bake quid-pro-quo dealmaking, coercive tactics, loyalty tests and other dishonorable practices into American government," the NYT editorial board writes. Adams must go. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/17/o...
Scholars can argue about a constitutional crisis, the NYT editorial board writes, but what's clear is that Trump's actions "are a frontal assault on the laws and norms that underpin American government — by the very people who are meant to execute the law." www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/o...
NYT editorial on Trump's arrogation of power: He "is testing Washington and the American people to see how far he can go in accumulating authority and in marginalizing anyone in a position to question his actions. It is a test the Constitution cannot afford to lose." www.nytimes.com/2025/02/01/o...