Important contribution to SCM and excellent crossover from IPCC to Journal of Supply Chain Management.

"When [trying to educate reviewers] was unsuccessful, some knowingly compromised the methodological integrity of their research and acquiesced to reviewer and editor requests."

Super interesting work by Clarke and colleagues.

psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...

Perhaps social science (and management science) shouldn't dismiss generative AI outright.

x.com/DeryaTR_/sta...

Friends, I don't think bluesky is the new town square. Announced our cool new AI tool to improve education (AlldayTA.com!). Response: that I'm "only good as firewood", shame!, gross, scab...and not from randos, but from academics and a Yale Review Editor.

On the r/professors subreddit, people are suggesting doing exactly what we have been doing in Denmark (or at least CBS) for the past few decades. The oral component of a bachelor/master's thesis is a really important part of the evaluation.

Here's a great starter pack of economists working on AI.

Who else should be on this list?

bsky.app/starter-pack...

Here's a great starter pack for folks interested in the economics of innovation, competition and IO

go.bsky.app/Rchu8QX

I have observed the same in different domains, but for me it seems like a natural consequence of academics being measured on number of publications because it de-incentivizes long-form research discussions through papers and incentivizes more disparate papers that can get published easily.

Which tool did you use for this?

Rather than restricting data to only the richest and most powerful (as reddit, facebook, and twitter do), bsky makes it available to everyone.

Personally, I think that's a good thing.

An interesting tension: @bsky.app has a very open API (so we can make all the cool lists etc) which also means it is very easy to draw data. Which means some users here are getting upset that data is drawn for AI training.

You can't have an open API without scraping, folks.

x.com/giffmana/sta...

Den meget korte version af dette post:

Har ChatGPT har gjort en forskel for dig? Det kan være inden for alle områder - sundhed, venskaber, parforhold, rejser, økonomi eller arbejde. Og både med positive og negative konsekvenser.

Så skriv til mig her eller på jp@pol.dk - man må gerne være anonym.

Lørdag aften fik min 3-årige datter pludselig ondt og græd utrøsteligt. Hun havde tidligere på dagen sagt, at hun havde »noget i ørene«, og da hun lå i sengen blev hun urolig og havde tydeligvis rigtig dårligt.

But maybe @emollick.bsky.social you can curate a custom AI feed? I think that would be helpful to a lot of people.

I haven't found a strong set of AI accounts to follow, but my impression is also that there is heavy anti-AI sentiment here. I've tried searching for AI in different ways and it mostly just results in accounts that dismiss or make fun of AI.

ChatGPT Defeated Doctors at Diagnosing Illness A small study found ChatGPT outdid human physicians when assessing medical case histories, even when those doctors were using a chatbot.

In a small study, doctors who were given ChatGPT to diagnose illness did only slightly better than doctors who did not. But the chatbot alone outperformed all the doctors.

“Frygt får Danmark til at halte bagud i AI-kapløbet” Debatten om AI handler meget om frygt og for lidt om innovation. Vi skal turde at investere i forskning og udvikling, der sikrer, at AI bruges til at forbedre samfundet For nylig holdt en af os oplæg

The debate on AI in Denmark is too much risk and not enough value. By focusing on the risk of AI and not the possible value, we are starting to lag behind in AI adoption.

Piece in Børsen with a group of cool collaborators across academia, politics, and industry.

borsen.dk/nyheder/opin...