A Consensus Statement on self-knowledge conceptualization, measurement, outcomes and changeability
I.Thielmann M.Back W.Bleidorn H.Bukowski E.Carlson M.Dufner G.Hofer W.Hofmann C.Hopwood L.Human C.Jordan J.Krueger J.Langdon R.Rau L.Smillie N.Strohminger J.Sun S.Vazire M.Burghart N.Casali & A.Seidl
Coauthors: Jules Dugré (shared first), Alexander Sahm, & Inti Brazil
Finally, we discuss potential pathways to reduce further fragmentation in psychopathy research.
At the item level, we identified 23 distinct content clusters across all measures, which further grouped into six higher-order clusters. However, most scales cover only a subset of these clusters.
We also found evidence of jingle fallacies, especially for callousness.
Although all 16 scales claim to assess psychopathy, our results suggest that several do not capture the construct in its entirety.
We used large language models to analyze the semantic content of 16 widely used self-report psychopathy scales (including Dark Triad measures).
Do you use psychopathy scales in your research? If so, our new preprint may be of interest to you 🧵👇
🔗 osf.io/preprints/ps...
So excited to share that the first publication from our eMotion project is out: what does empathy look like in interaction with psychopathy? tinyurl.com/yp8ykphe
Results from study of mental health in 92 countries (n>53,000): People are not doing well.
- U-shape for age is gone: Young adults lowest health, highest illness
- Education still matters (a lot)
- 45% of older people live alone
- Hybrid work > 100% remote or in-person
Preprint: osf.io/3jyda_v1