Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Bea Ahumada

Preview
2025 European Meeting of the Economic Science Association in Brno, Czech Republic | 2025 ESA European Meeting Join the European Meeting of the Economic Science Association 2025 at Masaryk University.

Join us for the 2025 European Meeting of the Economic Science Association in the beautiful city of Brno on 3-6 September! #ESA2025

📅 Submission deadline: May 5
✍️ Notification of acceptance & registration opens: May 16

More info ⏩ esa2025.econ.muni.cz

1 year ago 9 4 0 0
Post image

📢 #MUES research seminar

Tomorrow, Bea Ahumada (@beaahumada.bsky.social) from the University of Pittsburgh will discuss how, when income inequality is perceived to arise from both effort and luck, excuses can influence acceptance of inequality.

Join us ⏩ mues.econ.muni.cz/research-sem...

1 year ago 5 1 0 0
Post image

2. @beaahumada.bsky.social @lisev.bsky.social @alistairecon.bsky.social sites.pitt.edu/~alistair/pa... Replications of Dana et al., Exley, and Di Tella findsreduced effect sizes on the latter two. Most intriguingly, there was no correlation in excuse-seeking behavior across domains. 3/4

1 year ago 5 2 1 0

Do you want to know more about my research agenda?

My work explores fairness, inequality, and redistribution preferences using experimental and behavioral methods.

In this thread, I talk about my ongoing and future projects!

bsky.app/profile/beaa...

1 year ago 4 1 0 0
Ahumada_Excuses_Redistribution_OCT2024.pdf

#eeac Day 2: I might be biased, but don't let that be an excuse to miss Pitt @beaahumada.bsky.social JMP "Excuses and Redistribution" She induces uncertainty about source of earnings diffs between self/partner by randomizing between low and high piece-rate in a real effort task. #econsky #econjmp

1 year ago 6 2 1 1

Would love to hear your thoughts and connect with others working on similar topics! 🤝 #econsky #econjmp

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

My research uses behavioral insights to inform public policy, aiming to reduce inequality by addressing differences in opportunities and exploring mechanisms like redistribution, fairness norms, and inclusive hiring practices. I explore how institutions can promote fairness and mobility.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

🎯 Future projects:

Handicaps in the Labor Market. Initial ability differences often grow due to unequal opportunities. Using theory and experiments, I study how handicap tournaments (like in sports) can close ability gaps and reduce long-term inequality.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

🤔 “Silly” Interview Questions and Gender Bias in Hiring (w/ @mallorave.bsky.social & Neeraja Gupta):

We study how "irrelevant" questions (like ice-breakers) affect hiring decisions and whether they justify gender biases.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

Timing mirrors real-world policies (e.g., taxes, student loan forgiveness) and results could inform better policy design!

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

🌟 Preferences over the Timing of Fairness Policies (w/ @mallorave.bsky.social

We study how the timing of redistribution and related info impacts preferences. Spectators decide redistribution for workers who either know or don’t know about it before task.

1 year ago 3 1 1 1

Thank you for sharing, Stephanie!

I'm thrilled to share about my research agenda! My work explores fairness, inequality, and redistribution preferences through experimental and behavioral methods. Here's a quick look at ongoing and future projects tackling these crucial topics! 🧵👇 #econsky #econjmp

1 year ago 1 1 1 0

Say no more!

bsky.app/profile/beaa...

1 year ago 2 0 0 0
Ahumada_Excuses_Redistribution_OCT2024.pdf

Why does this matter?

Economic implications: These behaviors can perpetuate inequality.

Social implications: Fosters polarization - people believe that those who are poor have themselves to blame, but those who are rich are due to luck. (6/6)

Read more here: drive.google.com/file/d/1A8t4...

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Belief distortions aren’t the only story. I find evidence that people choose fairness views (egalitarian, meritocratic, or libertarian) that best align with their self-interest. (5/6)

1 year ago 2 0 2 0

Results:

Under No Information, participants believe their partners’ success is due to luck, justifying keeping more earnings for themselves.

Redistribution is lower, and inequality increases. (4/6)

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Key treatments:

No Information: Only know how much $ each of them made.

Partial Information: Effort distribution is shown, reducing uncertainty. (3/6)

1 year ago 2 0 1 0

In a lab experiment:

Participants perform a real-effort task where the piece rate (high or low) is randomly determined.

Then, they redistribute earnings between themselves and a partner under different information conditions. (2/6)

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Post image

I’m on the Job Market! 🚨

Ever wondered how does uncertainty about sources of inequality affects redistribution?
In my jmp, Excuses and Redistribution, I explore how people use excuses to distort beliefs about merit and luck, justifying self-serving behavior. 🧵(1/6)

1 year ago 26 8 1 8
Advertisement

Can I be added? Thanks!

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

I have made a starter pack for experimental economics. Please let me know if you would like to be added or deleted from the list. Thank you. go.bsky.app/2U7CMUC #Econsky

1 year ago 119 37 96 4

Can I be added? Thanks!

1 year ago 0 0 0 0