Why "instead of delivery trucks"? Those are personal transport vehicles, not vehicles to transport lots of goods as last-mile transport vehicles efficiently do, sometimes using electricity instead of FF.
Womöglich das einzig gute hierbei. Vielleicht verzichten dann mehr Leute darauf ein Auto zu kaufen und fahren stattdessen mit effizienteren öffentlichen Verkehrsmittel oder Rad was auch deren Ausbau begünstigen kann.
There's also an app for things one can do. The problems are that it's not open source, missing various things, and includes various questionable or problematic things www.earthhero.org Still useful
The problem with DeepL is that you can only translate a small amount of text per day as a free user unlike Google Translate.
MinT is an upcoming alternative.
It's already long autonomous and doesn't need any AI for that but has been using it for a long time extensively in finance such as algorithmic trading. It's just becoming even more autonomous with AI advancements and the issues ppl see with AI largely apply (better) to the current econ system
Wäre eine gute Sache da man so schneller eine Antwort finden kann ohne viel Zeit zu investieren oder auf werbungsüberfluteten Webseiten viel zu lange Texte lesen zu müssen.
Allerdings befürchte ich dass sie meist inakkurat sind usw.
Normaler Link? Der Link funktioniert nicht (mehr)
It's not cheap at all. When accidents occur they are super costly too and lots of other issues.
One actually very interesting article. There's many more cases like it but if you know / have any further images, see commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Categor...
eg 1566 Basel.
If that was the only event looked at in isolation then illusions may appear as the only possible explanation.
Cool, added those in the list to this largest list of bluesky accounts: www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidat...
the list as it is now; won't add those added later
The open source Librem phone is awesome but it's far from ready for mass-adoption...and, well, expensive
Btw, here's the audio podcast version of it: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wi...
Anti-migrant rhetoric or anti-(mass-)migration rhetoric?
What are the arguments for that? Add them to this map to the branches about the alternatives: www.kialo.com/what-are-ufo...
Is agree on/also see the issue with its deprioritization of Commons but I don't understand how you link it to this. How would these two could be related; if anything Commons becoming more valuable due to AI would be reason to raise its priority
Btw meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communi... could solve it
Describe how it's supposed to work. Is there some database of all the payment infos of all of those authors assuming they can get a list of all the living ones? How much benefit is it to those to get as much money as one (1) paying reader of all of their books? Also renting & used books.
Well I was just answering your question.
To answer your new question: you already did allow that if you released the book publicly. People & machines can acquire books and read them / learn from them. And in regards why: because there is no reason for why not + it may make your efforts more worth it
Yes I and many do. Open source and Wikipedia, Commons, etc and I appreciate when my efforts are useful. More AIs should be open source but many are usable for free and some are open source. People still buy books, authors apparently just weren't paid here but that's n=1 amount (like 1 person buying)
I basically learn art only for improving images made with AI art. It motivates many to learn traditional art skills for that. u have no idea what you're talking about. It grows a creative generation, able to produce good quality art rather than obedient professional-artist-dependent voiceless.
Good then that we don't "surrender art to automation".
It's a boom in creativity, handing people the power to create good quality art or the ability to create art more quickly by integrating AI into their workflows. Lots of creative novel ideas now being expressed & democratizing art.
There is a simple way to solve it: meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communi...
Also the server costs are a tiny percentage of Wikimedia's spending so it's not nearly as people think this is.
Also they don't cost 50% more, they get 50% more load.
What are they supposed to do instead – somehow work out all the contained authors, filter to those still alive and then pay each 30 or so euros? What's that supposed to be about?
Okay so please say what is so bad about this. What's unethical about it: that they didn't pay every author on the world 30€ each?
Every day also a video is chosen. Here's a new community about Commons with some further links for those interested: www.reddit.com/r/WCommons
It's not copyright infringement. Media on Commons is in the Commons and it's great to see them and all the long effort to organize these be more useful. This is a small thing the site is made for and I'm happy it's being used for building better AI.
