oh my god this again. the primary contradiction of capitalism is that of the proletariat vs the bourgeoisie. we are against Capitalism itself, and that includes not just the "Epstein class", "the 1%", "billionaires" etc but *all members of the bourgeoisie*. anything less merely dilutes the rhetoric

a working class chud is far more radicalisable than a (petite) bourgeois woke. don't form your class analysis on the basis of which faction of the bourgeoisie one supports.

Alleged someone allegedly burning a concentration camp in Kansas City.

Suburban wine moms will really be like "you believe in voting? that pales in effectiveness to my strategy, firebombing a concentration camp" and then very effectively firebomb a concentration camp

"I gathered a BUNCH of kids and put them all on an ISLAND

after the revolution everyone with a NATO pfp will be rounded up and sentenced to hard labour for the rest of their lives

It’s the capitalist class. The capitalist class.

(im disagreeing with u i am not attacking you. if u think my assessment of correctness is wrong, thats bcs thats how disagreements work)

1. it allows for "not all capitalists"
2. then we must push back against that line of rhetoric. pushing an "epstein class" merely diverts attention away

Today, there has “suddenly” sprung up in this country a host of liberal and progressive “Marxophobes”

it *is* incorrect to say that there is such a thing as the "epstein class". rhetoric for raising class consciousness can and should be tailored to meet the masses where they are, but that doesnt require pushing incorrect lines. people dont have to be tricked into learning. these are not new concepts

why should we have to dilute our rhetoric to the point that its straight up incorrect? the masses are smarter than you'd think. being truthful and pushing the correct political lines is far more important

Person: say, i am alive. Computer: I am alive. Person: oh my god.

a transphobe who "doesnt believe in your ideology but respects you regardless" will not hesitate to walk back on it the moment you stop being agreeable

cant tell if this is ironic or not

I understand people not wanting to talk about anything political, I really do. But when thousands of people are being starved to death, we all have a moral imperative to speak out, even if that is the smallest form of resistance that we can show against such brutality. [1/3]

scroll down further. also check out the account that that remilia art is from

Steak ‘n shake Twitter post from 7/20/25 Steak n Shake to give away over 100,000 Labubu beginning on August 4. More to come soon on how to win the coveted Labubu.

The Wendy’s social media manager deciding to be funny was one of the worst decisions of the 21st century

another RIGHT WING FASCIST defeated. common W for gooner nation

famiu was literally talking against censorship?? also I just looked through your profile and uh wanna explain the loli reposts?

how is this aligning with 'right wing fascists' 💀

AAAAAAA I JUST RECORDED THIS!!!! best lightning capture of my life

we got trans representation in the us congress and of course it's a pro-genocide kapo

no thinkpad so you should be fine

Really stupid

is horseshoe theory really the peak of liberal theory? cant believe these people actually feel clever saying shit like this

A post on r/transgendercirclejerk titled "Hey! I'm not calling you a man, i'm calling you a biological male! Sex does not equal gender, remember!" What do you mean "in today's gendered society, the two are basically associated together, as such, calling someone a "biological male" is still highly disrespectful"? It's just biological facts! It's not like that excuse was ever used to justify any forms of oppression, silly! What? Why do i care about it? Why do i associate so much importance to it as to talk about it when what i qualify as "biological sex" hardly affects you in your everyday life and it just makes you more dysphoric when i mention it? What do you mean this is just "shittily disguised misgendering"? It's not like i use it to deny your identity at all, i simply imply that it is one of the main traits of your person, that it will always affect who you are in some ways, and that it will always be this way no matter what. Nothing disrespectful or misgendering about that. Seriously, get tougher skin, can't even say biological facts anymore. Uj/ Anyone associating whatever tf value to "biological sex" (especially associating stuff like chromosomes or "the reproductive someone one would have under normal circumstances" as having any intrinsic value to who or what a person is) can actually fuck off lol. Yeah, certain medical attentions, certain physiological differences in some cases, but this is not the doctor's office, it couldn't matter less in most everyday life, especially not when judging someone's character or to bring it up casually, Remember what the average "it's common sense" arguments against gay ppl were, back when they were the spotlight minority? ("your anus is to excrete, not to put stuff in"/"gays cant reproduce", so on). Hold about as much water socially.

remember, anyone asking to know biological sex is at best an overly nosy idiot and at worst a transphobe trying to be subtle. there is no single determining factor for "biological sex". if you mean primary sex character then you might as well ask what's in my pants. it's basic biology sweaty

the sun in the sky is red

All I’m saying is, if Pluto were orbiting Jupiter it would be the fifth most interesting moon of Jupiter.

yoo its debian

either way I'm happy that this happened. it's a good excuse to talk about all the fascist rhetoric that is being made