@marijataflaga.bsky.social @markgkenny.bsky.social @anuausi.bsky.social @letstalkaboutsects.bsky.social @danilic.bsky.social @joelhill.bsky.social @marcfennell.bsky.social @scottmitchell.bsky.social @osmanfaruqi.bsky.social @emilywebbcrime.bsky.social
I don't think he has the neck strength required.
Episode 199 - Epstein - Tredders - Nazis - SovCits - Pete!
Trump is still plagued by the Epstein files. Tredders decides not to apologise for antisemitism. Nazis go mask off. It goes badly.
SovCits are still funny.
Pete is dishevelled and sad. Really? Doubt it.
redcircle.com/shows/00c09c...
Skepticon 2025! Almost live.
In this episode we look at the Ozenkadnook Tiger, Joel's cooked upbringing and the miracles of drinking piss.
But we also revisit the important condition known as ME/CFS which has so far been terribly mismanaged by conventional medicine.
redcircle.com/shows/00c09c...
Ray Mooney survived the brutal H Division at Pentridge where beatings were routine.
Despite refusing to break rocks and enduring constant violence, he never broke.
A powerful discussion on prison brutality, failed inquiries, and the urgent need for reform.
redcircle.com/shows/00c09c...
The Conditional Release Program is going live in Melbourne at Skepticon '25! A two day event from 4-5 October at Melbourne Uni Forum.
Jack will be in his home ground while I pretend to know what a hook turn is.
It's gonna be good. Let's bend some spoons!
skepticon.org.au/speaker/the-...
A couple poses for a selfie by a beautiful body of water, both smiling and enjoying the moment.
A tempting bakery display showcasing an assortment of pastries - Location: Lunko on the Lane (Liverpool)
A couple displays their drinks and a bag of treats from Lunko by the Lane in Liverpool, capturing a sweet coffee date.
A man with long hair and sunglasses stands on a bridge, gazing at the water of the Mersey River.
Had the sweetest road trip and city break with my fellow tall and beautiful goofball 🥰
We are so going back to Liverpool.. what a fabulous city! So much to do.. so much to eat!!
Oooh your podcast looks excellent. Bless social media.
You did really good this year. Real impact. Nice one.
This week we look at the 764 and O9A groups that use sextortion tactics to inflict horrible harm upon strangers they find on the internet. It's incredibly cooked and swimming in CSAM. The kids really are not alright.
Listener discretion: it's rough.
redcircle.com/shows/00c09c...
This is an interesting debate between David Speers and David Speers with occasional interjections from a couple of other guys.
Oooh fun. You doing the audiobook?
The debate between silliness and woomera was a thing.
I like the silliness tbh.
You were missed today and talked about fondly.
Flippers up!
This was….five months ago
Vote early and vote often
So we put in a pitch for a podcast session at SXSW this year - but we need votes!
We'll be joined by friend of the podcast @edcoper.bsky.social - it will be great for the pod if we are selected. Fingers crossed they let me take beers in.
Cheers guys!
publicvoting.sxswsydney.com/profile/8469...
boebert: you can’t fool me, LBJ is spanish for blowjob.
WITNESS: I think you're confusing Oliver Stone with Roger Stone.
REP. LAUREN BOEBERT: Sorry.
WITNESS: It's Roger Stone who implicated LBJ in the assassination of the president; it's not my friend Oliver Stone.
I don't really care that it was a Quaker house - I saw this and thought it was the USA.
This is deeply concerning.
this might be the funniest message you could have leaked due to poor OPSEC
14. The case referred to in the first paragraph of this extract does not exist. The judgment with the medium neutral citation referred to is a completely different matter which did not involve Rofe J. We apprehend that the reference may be a product of hallucination by a large language model. We have therefore redacted the case name and citation so that the false information is not propagated further by artificial intelligence systems having access to these reasons.
68. The appellant sought to rely on an authority which she said supported the proposition that a judge must recuse where there is a connection with a previous employer. However, the citation she provided did not align with a judgment from any Australian court searched by reference to the names of the parties or the subject of recusal. The appellant was unable to provide a copy of the judgement but said that she had a summary. Having conducted further enquiries, I am satisfied that the authority cited was generated by artificial intelligence and does not correlate with a decision of an Australian court. I do not consider that the appellant has misled the Court deliberately but has mistakenly assumed that her internet searches would yield accurate results.
Two more AI hallucinations in Australian court judgements today
You win the internet.
That dude is gonna get hella laid chicks love alternative rock and sex too.
I do but I'm not allowed to :-(
Comedy is still legal, for now.
This is the comment of the year.
