@everycasualty.bsky.social
Posts by Mike Spagat
7/7
Like a fingerprint at a crime scene, this is evidence, not a verdict. It does not establish genocidal intent on its own. But it places Gaza in uncomfortable demographic company and substantially narrows the range of plausible innocent explanations.
6/7
A common objection is that Gaza's somewhat elevated proportion of young adult male deaths proves the IDF was targeting combatants. But that male excess is modest compared to conflicts within the Combatant-skewed and Male-targeted clusters.
5/7
Gaza post-October 7 falls within the Indiscriminate cluster — alongside Rwanda, Cambodia and the El Mozote Massacre from the civil war in El Salvador. This holds across two separate analyses, including one that accounts for Gaza's young population structure.
4/7
🔴 Indiscriminate — deaths spread across ages and sexes, with women, children and elderly present in substantial numbers. Examples: Rwanda and Cambodia.
3/7
🟡 Combatant-skewed — deaths concentrated among young adult males. Examples: Colombia, Northern Ireland, Peru.
🔵 Male-targeted — males across a wide age range systematically killed regardless of combatant status. Examples: Bosnia, Srebrenica, Kosovo.
2/7
The core idea: different types of violence leave behind distinctive patterns, not just in the total numbers killed, but in the proportions falling into detailed age/sex categories — a conflict's demographic fingerprint.
1/7
Yesterday I presented new research on what I'm calling the "demographic fingerprints" of armed conflict — and what they reveal about Gaza.
Here is a recording of the presentation: vimeo.com/1175493576?s...
This is a very cool article/🧵 that outlines the argument and evidence in my book, Divided Armies, about why prejudice and discrimination is bad for military effectiveness
6. When militaries target combatants, demographics skew heavily male because fighting forces are predominantly male.
Gaza's low ratio (3.2) shows deaths are spread across the population - not concentrated among fighters. The data is inconsistent with precision targeting.
5. The West Bank shows sky-high ratios (41-73), exceeded only by the Srebrenica genocide (188.5). This underscores that high ratios aren't necessarily 'good' - at these levels, they show males are being specifically targeted, which can itself indicate atrocity.
4. Combat-focused conflicts show much higher ratios:
Bosnia (25.5)
Croatia (24.4)
Irish Revolution (19.2)
Iraq (9.5)
When armies target fighters, the ratios reflect it.
3. The Rwandan genocide (1.07) and El Mozote massacre (0.65) - where everyone in a small area was killed - have substantially lower ratios. These represent totally indiscriminate mass killing regardless of age or sex.
2. Male-to-female ratios (ages 15-39) across 21 cases:
Gaza: 3.2 - one of the LOWEST
Median: 8.49
Gaza's closest company: Oct 7 attack (2.74), inside Israel pre-Oct 7 (3.45), Cambodia/Khmer Rouge (4.17)
1. IDF defenders claim Gaza's male-to-female ratio (~3.2:1 in ages 15-39) shows exceptional care in protecting civilians.
I analyzed this ratio across 21 cases. The data shows the opposite: Gaza's pattern is consistent with indiscriminate killing, not precision targeting. 🧵
The think tankers/analysts/ “journalists” who spent years debunking Gaza death count should be feeling a bit shook right now, maybe a little hung out to dry, possibly taking a good long look in the mirror and hating what they see, potentially seeking new career. In reality, likely no consequences.
4. Netanyahu also claimed Allied forces in WW2, Afghanistan, and Iraq had CCRs of 6:1 or 7:1. This is false and Israel's current CCR greatly exceeds all of these.
The article for @aoav.bsky.social is worth a careful read.
@iainoverton.bsky.social
3. The logic: if the IDF kills X>1 men for every woman among 55-60 year olds (virtually none of whom are combatants), the bias should be at least that high for 25 year olds. A 55-year-old looks less like a fighter than a 25-year-old. This alone roughly doubles the estimated CCR.
2. The key insight: some previous estimates treated all excess males in military-age ranges as combatants. But civilian men die at higher rates than women in every war. Frost uses the male:female ratio just outside combat ages as a lower bound for bias within combat ages.
1. New analysis by @karlfrost.bsky.social shows Israel's civilian-to-combatant ratio in Gaza is far worse than Netanyahu claims. He told the Economist it's 1.5:1. The data says otherwise—likely 5:1 to 8:1 depending on scope. @aoav.bsky.social
aoav.org.uk/2026/why-isr...
Essential reading from Rachel Taylor, out Executive Director at
@everycasualty.bsky.social
everycasualty.org/holocaust-me...
Hi, how are you doing?
The black box of combat deaths: why Israel must release its Gaza casualty data
Excellent analysis for @aoav.bsky.social by @michael-spagat.bsky.social, as ever.
aoav.org.uk/2025/the-bla...
Technical debates over famine definitions miss the point while children in Gaza starve
Powerful op-ed piece by @michael-spagat.bsky.social here for
@aoav.bsky.social
aoav.org.uk/2025/technic...
#Gaza #Genocide #Germancomplicity
apnews.com/photo-essay/...
bsky.app/profile/did:...