Is he talking about DC’s mayor? 👀
Posts by Payton Chung
"Food being a human right doesn't mean that someone does it for free. It just means that it's getting paid for by someone to be available to everyone."
(BTW, that also applies to housing!)
Huh, this exists. Guess I should do a "Make Your Own Damn Building" reaction meme
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Yo...!
The same thing can and does happen to house prices, if only we let it happen:
ggwash.org/view/99926/h...
Even more pertinent: the introduction of a really cheap *new* car caused *used* car prices to plummet
www.drive.com.au/news/tata-na...
Basically this:
A new convert to nonpartisan redistricting!
Sometimes you publish a brilliantly silly piece about an ongoing news story, and sometimes, minutes after it publishes, that news story takes a major turn that instantly renders the brilliantly silly piece dated. Them's the breaks in the fast-paced world of satire.
www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/id-...
Not everyone realizes that social status competitions are occurring in parallel. Why can't every clique just get along... 😆
The classic Onion headline "This War Will Destabilize The Entire Mideast Region And Set Off A Global Shockwave Of Anti-Americanism vs. No It Won’t" has been modified to say "This Project Will Calm Traffic and Improve Safety for All Road Users vs. No It Won't"
This is what the bike lane discourse sounds like
Gov't fees are a soft cost, as is the stormwater bond I have to post. But the $50K/unit stormwater detention tank & filtration system for my townhouses (SFHs are exempted entirely) is a hard cost.
Fire walls have more material and more complicated detailing. Most of the increase is site work costs: more complex stormwater, higher "multifamily" standards for driveways, and smaller sites being more difficult for staging
One potential mechanism behind the eternal arguments between "downwardly mobile gentrifier" NIMBYs vs. upwardly-mobile YIMBYs: "experience of upward mobility... is associated with a less zero-sum worldview" (aka abundance mentality)
Instead of 136 apartments one block from Metro (47 affordable or artist units), there will be 17 rowhouses for $1.5M+ apiece. The site has been empty since 2009 and is ONE block from Metro.
Both graphs are per unit, variable sq ft.
DC's strict solar-rights laws have predictably been weaponized to prevent taller housing, e.g. the 9-story bldg proposed for this vacant lot.
I'm developing a surface parking lot right now; it won't get a solar canopy b/c future ADUs above it would have a much greater carbon impact.
These are *not* small structures; they have welded steel bracing and concrete footings. Cost is 40% more, energy and carbon footprint is 2-4X larger (concrete = lotsa CO2).
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Ground/roof-mount systems can just drill prefab studs in.
But finding an all-trips mode share survey for downtown residents would be very difficult, particularly given small sample sizes. Maybe some city's downtown BID has done one?
Would be interesting to see. I suspect that combining high walk mode share + substantially lower population density = much lower transit ridership from the same building
ggwash.org/view/98189/g...
MTR's newer CRRC sets are definitely optimized for very heavy duty, with almost all comforts stripped away. Average journey times are short in super-dense HKG, so who even needs a seat? Polar opposite of original BART, which was intended for long seated commutes
The bigger falsehood about the L illustration is that it assumes SFH = middle-floor condo in price or cost, which is absurd on its face.
Not sure why this persists when real-world numbers exist
flickr.com/photos/payto...
bsky.app/profile/west...
You know what *is* an incredibly smart idea, but one with bad aesthetic vibes? Bulldozing farm fields for ground-mounted solar panels.
thefern.org/2024/01/etha...
Agrivoltaics can usually avoid the concrete foundation; cows are shorter than trucks & don't move as fast
As long as drivers are paying:
bsky.app/profile/west...
I haven't run the numbers myself, but I've talked to people who built solar carports that paid for themselves with DC's crazy high incentives
I'd be willing to trade a solar parking lot requirement for zero minimum parking requirements + street parking pricing. Making parking more expensive would do MUCH more to combat global warming than the solar carports would.
The greenest parking lot is... no parking lot.
Allowing one (1) household to live in DC instead of the exurbs = 26 MT CO2 = as much CO2 savings as a 3000-parking-space solar arrays (= half of a large shopping mall parking lot).
Concrete foundations double the system's carbon footprint
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
(Obviously, this doesn't apply if there was already going to be a parking-lot shade structure, but those are only common in a few states.)
That this idea (greenwashing minimum parking requirements) is so popular gives me a headache.
The crash-proof structures have to be huge to withstand truck crashes: "A carport is roughly 40% more expensive compared to a ground mount system"
www.cnet.com/home/solar/s...
Lathrop shows us how much our building code has killed the livability of our housing
The old buildings have thin floorplates with light on 2/3 sides of each unit. Good for crossbreeze and better tenant experience
The new buildings are double loaded corridors that have light on 1 side on many units