No I'm in S W London

Protection against defamation I am a barrister and member of campaigning group Fair Cop. I do not believe it is possible to change sex and we should have the right to talk about this.

You'll be waiting a long time for the BSB to do anything. But he is being sued for defamation by a female barrister. Joly of course was hoping she was financially backed by JKR but she isn't. Support her here www.crowdjustice.com/case/protect...

And you do the mysogyny.

I'm afraid I don't share your optimism about the gender woo. But single market membership could work. We will never get back what we lost anyway, because the UKs position was uniquely beneficial.

His supporters are now openly advocating violence. This won't be sustainable.

Level of debate on this platform. 👇🏼

Persuasive argument.

Quite.

because people are getting chucked off the lists by subterfuge

Ex Remainder here. No more referendums. A significant proportion of voters are also proposing to vote Green which means liking policies such as closing all prisons and legalising all drugs. The EU now proposes self ID which removes sex based protection for women. It's a no from me.

I bet a lot of them went to see the recent Emerald Fennel film which featured a man getting an erection while being hanged, which most definitely is not in the book.

Plausible alternative is that he's desperate for JKR to sue him, which would boost GLP coffers no end. It wouldn't matter if he lost, because he could pretend he hadn't really, while getting the gullible to pay his costs, and a guaranteed income stream. He's doing that to another woman already.

The glaring issue, as this article correctly identifies, is that the Labour Govt has decided, on this issue, to defy the rule of law, abetted by the civil service. That has consequences far beyond women's rights. If not corrected quick, expect future Govts to ignore what *they* don't like too.

According to the Head Gardener where I volunteer, we're already in drought season. Looking at my garden I can believe it.

I think delusional. He's lost it

Ah we have an independent residents party who seem to get a lot done.

In local elections here there's usually an independent of some kind here which is where I went last time. Otherwise I suppose it's tactical voting or "least bad" ( which rules our Reform) but I've lost a child to the "genderwoo" so for me any party that promotes it is "no way".

You only have Reform or Green choices?

Then you've shot yourself in the foot as a female, sorry. Keeping shtum just means going with the flow.

You shared a post that said "the King doesn't pay taxes" Demonstrably untrue, as you later acknowledged by admitting he does voluntarily pay tax. And no one in the UK has the right to know what anyone else pays in tax. So then you got cross about being corrected. I think that sums it up.

This article exposes the duplicity of trans activism. A TRA organisation criticises the Cass review for lack of data, while another ( with the same influential TRA on its board) deliberately withheld that data.

Bloody hell

Trials and Tribulations Activists demand proof while burying the evidence

www.voidifremoved.co.uk/p/trials-and...

She's about as feminist as Andrew Tate

@glosswitch.bsky.social Right on point....again.

Photograph of Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women and Girls, speaking at a United Nations event in front of the blue UN symbol.

Labour is “weakening legal protections for women and girls” by failing to publish the EHRC guidance on safeguarding the right to single-sex spaces, said Reem Alsalem, UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls.
Phillipson wants to "tone down" the guidance, which would nullify it.

Yep GLP are just outright lying now. Actually fleecing people to keep their funding lines open.

Isn't it? I nicked it from someone here - but can't remember who.

It beggars belief that their funding wasn't cut when their former Chief Exec was convicted of child sex offences.