Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Melanie

Well, he did say, "I repeat" 🤣

1 day ago 0 0 0 0
Video

RUBIO: “Imagine if Iran spent billions on its people instead of weapons... They’d have a much different country.”🤔😕

Unreal. @marcorubio Do you even hear yourselves? Your shameless hypocrisy is killing us

3 weeks ago 22795 7210 2525 1201
Video

wow -- Tillis goes ballistic on Noem, telling her "what we've seen is a disaster under your leadership"

1 month ago 26976 7084 1449 833

The American people now see Trump for who he is — a would-be dictator who does not care what Americans think or want, cares nothing about our Constitution or our laws, and sees himself as a kind of eighteenth-century king, with unlimited power to drag us into wars without the consent of the people.

1 month ago 2921 831 181 32
Preview
Laws restricting abortions linked to rise in 'abhorrently high' maternal mortality rates Rising state-level abortion restrictions in the United States were linked to a similar, parallel rise in maternal deaths from 2005 to 2023, according to research presented at The Pregnancy Meeting. ...

Researchers have found that 6 of 10 abortion restrictions — bans on Medicaid funding for abortion, mandated waiting periods, 2nd-trimester abortion bans, ACA marketplace insurance coverage bans, biased counseling laws, and ultrasound requirements — were linked to higher rates of maternal mortality.

2 months ago 4727 2299 245 160

She has been willfully looking the other way in regards to Epstein and his rapey friends for many years.

2 months ago 4 0 1 0

She thought if it works for the Press Sec, it could work for her too.

2 months ago 2 0 0 0

It is really expensive to be poor. Higher interest rates for loans, if you can get one. Paying late fees on everything. Anything breaks, and you are in HUGE trouble because you have no way to save for a rainy day.

2 months ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
a man wearing glasses is sitting in front of a brick wall and says `` and ... that 's a lie . '' ALT: a man wearing glasses is sitting in front of a brick wall and says `` and ... that 's a lie . ''
2 months ago 3 0 0 0
Preview
a bald man with a beard is wearing a blue shirt and a blue tie . ALT: a bald man with a beard is wearing a blue shirt and a blue tie .

BOOOOOO!

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Trump pardoned actual criminals, and his ICE goons are out terrorizing people trying to support their families.
WTF alternate universe are we living in?

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Shutting down faster than his casinos!! 🤣🤣🤣

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Follow up question
"Mr. President, do you prefer it with syrup or jelly?"

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

Trump has no idea what is considered wealthy to the average citizen. Just as he has no idea what affordability means and no clue what groceries are. He is so out of touch with reality.

2 months ago 6 0 1 0

Reporters need to straight up start calling these people liars.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

How about... every time these jackasses start telling lies about events we have all witnessed with our own eyes, the reporter mutes their mic and tells viewers
"Sorry, we are not willing to spread the lies of the administration."

2 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Hey NRA, are you good with this?

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

2 months ago 27653 10177 1579 676

I just spoke with the White House after another horrific shooting by federal agents this morning. Minnesota has had it. This is sickening.

The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota. Now.

2 months ago 47046 13445 6074 1887
Advertisement

Big hugs to you!

3 months ago 1 0 1 0

These are the same fuckers who whined that they couldn't breathe when told to wear a mask during covid.

3 months ago 8 1 0 0
Post image

Whew, this new CNN poll is brutal....
58% say first year was a failure. Net approval on key issues:
- Venezuela: -16
- Immigration: -16 (was +3 in Mar)
- Economy: -21
- Foreign affairs: -21
- Job approval: -22 (39-61)
- Tariffs: -25 (new low)
- Healthcare: -27 (new low)
www.cnn.com/2026/01/16/p...

3 months ago 1597 632 90 58
Post image
3 months ago 60 20 3 2
Video

damn -- CNN put together a video of Kristi Noem claiming ICE officers are "highly trained and skilled" and "gifted" alongside to a clip of them beating someone nearly to death in Minneapolis

3 months ago 28676 11473 1929 753
Post image
3 months ago 8377 2340 2639 1545
Post image
3 months ago 51 14 3 1
Advertisement

How is he president right now if the dems are committing rampant voter fraud? Wouldn't they have made sure the Orange Idiot did not make it back to the Oval?

3 months ago 3 0 0 0

What I see...
Trump deported all of these SUPPOSED Venezuelan terrorists and started destroying Venezuelan boats SUPPOSEDLY filled with drugs, to make us all believe we need to be afraid of Venezuelans so we'd be ok with over throwing their government so we could have their oil.

3 months ago 1 0 0 0
News Team,
Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier.
I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity.
Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one.
We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed
to kill the story.
If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we

News Team, Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier. I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity. Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one. We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story. If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we

have effectively handed them a "kill switch" for any reporting they find inconvenient.
If the standard for airing a story becomes
"the government must agree to be
interviewed," then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast.
We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state.
These men risked their lives to speak with us.
We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their
stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless.
CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that "low point." By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones.

have effectively handed them a "kill switch" for any reporting they find inconvenient. If the standard for airing a story becomes "the government must agree to be interviewed," then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast. We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state. These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless. CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that "low point." By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones.

We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it.
When it fails to air without a credible
explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of "Gold Standard" reputation for a single week of political quiet.
I care too much about this broadcast to watch
it be dismantled without a fight.
Sharyn

We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it. When it fails to air without a credible explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of "Gold Standard" reputation for a single week of political quiet. I care too much about this broadcast to watch it be dismantled without a fight. Sharyn

Per NY Times’s Michael Grynbaum on X, this is Sharyn Alfonsi’s email to her “60 Minutes” colleagues in full:

4 months ago 27363 10818 678 956

Two game-changing fumbles in that game. Even with Love out, we were kicking ass...ugh! This one hurts!

4 months ago 1 0 0 0

This has to be one of THE most despicable things I have ever read. I have found things on the bottom of my shoes that have more humanity than this president.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0