At Patelâs request or encouragement, NAF provided the Biden DOJ with substantial information that aided in identifying investigation targets and substantiating warrants and
prosecutions. 53 NAF alerted Patel to social media posts that made violent threats against clinics54 and concerns about protest activities that could constitute blockades in violation of the FACE Act. 55 In the Handy matter, Patel emailed NAF: âI canât recall if you ever shared anything with me (either through an attachment or via Dropbox) about Jonathan Darnellâs arrest . . . If you did, can you resend that to me?â 56
53 See, e.g., E-mail from Patel, to Megan Healy (Nov. 16, 2020) (Exhibit 040) (âNAF is obtaining the security video from the vandalism for me.â). 54 E-mail from Patel, to Emma Goldberg (NAF) (Apr. 12, 2021) (Exhibit 041) (flagging that Patel forwarded the information to the FBI immediately and noting that he was âdesignated as the DOJ National FACE Act Task force directorâ and wanted to call about exploring outreach initiatives). 55 E-mail from Fleisher, to Patel (Aug. 18, 2020) (Exhibit 042) (responding to a NAF alert about Handyâs pro-life activities in Washington, D.C., a CRT attorney asked NAF to let him know â[i]f she actually ends up causing any obstruction,â and noted that while he could not speak for the Criminal Section, âwe on the civil side might be interested in looking furtherâ); E-mail from Davidson, to [Redacted], FBI (Jan. 30, 2021) (Exhibit 043) (alerting DOJ to Handyâs activities in Maryland). 56 E-mail from Patel, to Davidson (Dec. 8, 2020) (Exhibit 044).
In its "weaponization" report on the FACE Act, DOJ once again struggles to answer the most difficult question of all: who was president in 2020? www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justi...