Let's recall that Kezia Dugdale is a member of Starmer's tendency in Labour - you might have seen the kind of people Starmer goes to bat for in the news.
Let's also recall that Rowling allowed both Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew Windsor to hang around child actors working on her shows.
We should ask in what circumstances Kezia Dugdale 'had the pleasure of meeting' JK Rowling.
Were these meetings in public or private? How many were they? In what locations did they take place? Who else was there?
Were children present?
Why does Keir Starmer keep wanting to find jobs for the best friends of paedophiles
Brasseye's "This is the one thing we didn't want to happen" graphic, with the words floating in different fonts over an image of a NASA controller.
In the process, he made an entirely new revelation of a separate attempt to install in a different diplomatic post a different Labour figure who, it later emerged, had his own controversial ties with a different sex offender.
the Brasseye image but now it says "This is the two things we didn't want to happen"
Four local Labour figures due in court next month on charges of conspiracy and computer misuse in relation to irregularities surrounding Labour’s 2023 candidate selection process for Croydon East.
Taken a lengthy police investigation ...
insidecroydon.com/2026/04/21/f...
Unbelievable.
Not content with appointing Mandelson as US ambassador despite his links to Epstein, Starmer tried to appoint another man with a known friendship with a sex offender.
When is the Prime Minister finally going to take some responsibility?
You've gotta want it
youtu.be/FfXWZ7RBM-4?...
Trans people can't safely use identifying documents, especially in jurisdictions that mandate misgendered ones. Trans people are just one case in point. Identifying documents exist for the purpose of marking people for life.
Wall Street Journal headline: "Alan Dershowitz: Why I'm Becoming a Republican"
Higher acceptance of sex crimes, same reason as everyone else who announces this
transphobes thinking they've won the war and can say whatever they want now will blow up in their faces. no, the supreme court didn't actually say you can call trans people sexual predators, you fucking freaks
Anyway maybe if Tucker Carlson's brain was half as good as his repeated guest and friend Charles Murray says white people brains are then he wouldn't have been so easily "misled" by Donald Trump
If I were a Machiavellian strategy genius, I would simply avoid a position where *everything written about me ever* supports the “demanding bribes for factional allies” rumour
they're so angry about all allegations against her being thrown out that they are hounding her to another country with more false, vicious allegations. but they're definitely the good guys!
Interesting that it's the Anonyvoter system at the heart of this. Just how corrupt was Labour's candidate selection process for the 2024 election? Beth Winter and Sam Tarry both made serious allegations about their deselections via this system.
Here is their contact details.
• Mix and match.
• Better today and rough around the edges than later.
• Personal more important than consistency.
www.stonewall.org.uk/contact-us
Write to Stonewall.
• Tell them you supported them in the past.
• Tell them why you won’t be supporting transphobia.
Cut direct debts.
Don’t by the merch.
Tell your direct contacts.
Centre for Law and History Research Workshop on *Law, History and Reproduction' 1 May 2026, 10 am to 5 pm BST @ Room 2.13, Wills Memorial Building, University of Bristol Law School, BS8 1RJ Contact: Dr Gauri Pillai (gauri.pillai@bristol.ac.uk) and Dr Elena Caruso elena.caruso@bristol.ac.uk)
PROGRAM 10:00-10:30 Coffee and introduction by the organisers Session 1 10:30 - 11:15 am Dr Angela Kintominas, Faculty of Law & Justice, UNSW Sydney, 'A Hidden History of Women's Work: Excavating the Regulation of Reproductive Labour Across Work, Welfare and Migration Legal Regimes in Australia' (online) Discussant: Dr Katie Cruz, Law School, University of Bristol. 11:20 - 12:05 pm Francesca Frisone, University of Messina, Defining the indefinable. Obstetric and gynaecological violence in Italy from an historical point of view' Discussant: Professor John Foot, Department of Italian School of Modern Languages, University of Bristol. 12:10 - 12:55 pm Desi Yunitasari and Devi Yusvitasari, Melbourne Law School 'Gender-Based Violence and Reproductive Criminalisation: Feminist Interventions in the Legal History of Reproduction in Indonesia' (online) Discussant: Dr. Gauri Pillai, Law School, University of Bristol. Lunch 13:00 - 14:15 pm Lunch at Moltobuon!' for authors and discussants (Moltobuono 59 Park St, Bristol BS1 5NU) Session 2 14:15 - 15:00 pm Anisha Aggarwal, Vinoj Manning, Ami Sahgal 'Do Laws Carry History? A Study of Abortion in the Indian Subcontinent' (online) Discussant: Dr Andrea Espinoza Carvajal, Department of Hispanic, Portuguese and Latin American Studies School of Modern Languages, University of Bristol 15:05 - 15:50 pm Dr Kay Crosby, Newcastle University UK Legal Gender Recognition in the 1920s and 1930s' Discussant: Professor Lois S. Bibbings, Law School, University of Bristol 15:55 - 16:40 pm Dr Andreana Dibben (University of Malta), 'Repeating the Script: Moral-Legal Discourses, Feminist Mobilisation, and Reproductive Governance in the MAP and Bill 28 processes in Malta' Discussant: Professor Sally Sheldon, Law School, University of Bristol 16:45 - 17:00 pm Closing remarks by the organisers
I’m very much looking forward to speaking at this event on legal histories of reproductive justice at the University of Bristol next week. My paper is far less well developed than I’d hoped, but I think there’s still enough there for an interesting discussion.
Essentially, most of the UK establishment views the Savile era as a golden age and is trying to force us back into the social and media environment of that time.
The reason for this is that an awful lot of the British media and political establishment shared Savile's tastes, albeit perhaps not as prolifically. A great deal of policy in the UK right now, pushed by both politicians and the media, is intended to make it easier for them to access victims.
The British press pivoting to transphobia was a deliberate and conscious decision made because Brexit A.) happened, which they weren’t expecting, and B.) didn’t make anyone’s lives better. The press needed a new scapegoat to sell papers on so no one would think too hard about Brexit & blame them.
the whole UFO thing was started as a counter-intelligence operation to obscure US R&D/defense stuff during the cold war and they lost control of it, meaning a non-negligible chunk of the conspiracism about the government in that movement is reading actual events through a heavily distorted lens
The CIA 100% had a hand in dismissal of Australian prime minister Gough Whitlam in 1975.
Dude was far too left wing for there tastes.
You would think that at a time when trans rights were being relentlessly targeted by wealthy elites, a charity named after an actual riot in support of those rights would have the grit to stand firm by its people, writes Steph Paton ✍️
"I walked into a situation in which there was already a very, very strong expectation, coming from number 10, that [Mandelson] needed to be in post and in America as quickly as humanly possible," Olly Robbins tells MPs.
"There was a generally dismissive attitude to his vetting clearance"
Also: Savile's activities were an open secret among the UK media and political establishment throughout his career of evil. Similar figures to Savile are likewise known to and allowed to continue offending by that same establishment today, and lionised by the media.
At least some recent trans perpetrators of mass casualty incidents have been assets cultivated by national intelligence services or police agencies
So if you’re cis and reading this, all the self-ID demand really amounts to is that the state should permit us to get our papers in order without first having to be asked by a stranger about our preferred methods and fantasies in a masturbatory context.
I’m sure she’s right that an earlier generation of cis gays wanted ‘freedom from aggression and discrimination’. I’m pretty sure healthcare and depathologisation were in the mix, too; but we can’t reasonably expect Kathleen Stock to know any queer history. As a trans gay I also want those things.
