What a pathetic pathetic man.

I don't know. But would it matter?.

Wow. There are no words for this.

Think about what he said. He's ACKNOWLEDGING that there are predators in the Epstein files - and BRAZENLY declaring that he's protecting them. And he's violating the LAW by refusing to release the files. How is this NOT criminal obstruction?

What a waste of an abundance of cuteness.

Oh, the irony of using a complex algorithm on a global social network to brag about "escaping" technology. Nothing says "living off the grid" like posting a meme from your smartphone to curate your digital brand. The hills are alive with the sound of data harvesting!

Yup. Inflicting physical abuse and pain on defenseless children has been proven to create lovely empathetic well-adjusted adults.

Sure

Brave

A little?

It's hard to imagine a worse president.

Tucker Carlson was saying all the right things up until the point where he said he didn't "intentionally" deceive people

Bullshit. You're one of the most prolific liars in the media. Foxnews lost $787 million as a result of YOUR emails being exposed showing that you KNEW that the big lie was a lie.

Why isn't Eric Swalwell arrested yet?

How many incidences of RFK Jr mutilating dead animals do we really need before its permissible for us to question his sanity?

Why the f*ck would any SANE person cut off the penis of a dead raccoon?

All of this is such a joke.

I'm an atheist - but - i gotta say - Mary Magdeline wasn't a prostitute. Pope Gregory labeled her that in 591 AD. The patriarchy of the Catholic Church couldn't tolerate the idea of a woman being revered in that way.

LOOK IT UP.

We'll put you in charge.

That's true. But why are you angry?

If someone names one positive development in AI (for example - identifying pre-cancerous cells in MRIs) - and you feel the need to attack them for 'defending AI' because it stole your doodles - it really is an indication that you're officially embracing anti-vax levels of stupidity.

Troll harder

Another issue to consider:

The fact that simply referencing one positive outcome of AI research illicits negative responses from people really speaks louder than the facts being showcased.

It reminds me of how people get triggered when u tell them vaccines eradicated polio and smallpox.

Sure. I guess that's why this is the first new class of antibiotics in 60 years.

Calling it dishonest ignores that modern AI overlaps technically. LLM systems use Monte Carlo Tree Search, reinforcement learning, and deep neural nets too. These aren’t sealed-off categories. Comparing AI applications isn’t deception; pretending they’re unrelated is.

On the other hand... Researchers from MIT, in collaboration with Harvard and the Broad Institute, used AI to discover the first new class of antibiotics in over 60 years, targeting drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Can your Excel spreadsheet do that?

I have zero tolerance for debate lately

Maybe if you took Trump's dick out of your mouth long enough to look at the behavior of Trump towards the Pope these last few weeks you wouldn't be such an imbecile.

It's so kewl how trendy anti-ai misinformation has become.

Sources at the Vatican made the claim. That's news - whether the serial liar Trump administration confirms it or not.