21 Wins, 21 Years Later: The streak begins Pat Lane and Matt St. Jean begin their series recapping all 21 wins from New England’s record-setting streak.

A new series from @mattstjean.bsky.social and Pat Lane: 21 Wins, 21 Years Later.

Today, the streak begins.

Patriots player profile: Carlton Davis has joined the perfect situation Previewing the Patriots cornerback heading into his first season with the team.

The latest installment in our Patriots player profile series is online (feat. @tkyles39.bsky.social): an in-depth look at Carlton Davis, and why he might have joined the perfect situation in New England.

10 fun facts about the Patriots’ 2025 schedule The NFL announced its schedule for the upcoming season on Wednesday.

The Patriots' schedule is out and @mattstjean.bsky.social has 10 fun facts about it.

Good stuff from Drake Maye on third-and-6

Double LB blitz. Stays calm against interior pressure. Throws dot against tight coverage.

Also: I am privileged and honored to be working with some of the best young talent in the business, namely @oliverbthomas.bsky.social, @mattstjean.bsky.social and @tkyles39.bsky.social as well as Brian Hines and Pat Lane.

You couldn't ask for better colleagues on draft weekend, or ever.

With NFL Draft weekend coming to an end, I wanted to extend a sincere thank you to all of you for following along both here and on @patspulpit.bsky.social.

The draft is the most fun yet exhausting few days on the calendar, but the feedback and support makes it worth it every year.

Where Will Campbell ranks among tackles taken in the first half of the first round since 2022 in run block grade, pass block grade, total pressures allowed, and pressure rate on true pass sets (data from PFF):

My initial Will Campbell thoughts.

Full stream: www.youtube.com/live/bjNkihX...

Patriots Big Board: The 50 best fits in the 2025 NFL Draft From the likes of Travis Hunter and Will Campbell to Isaac TeSlaa and Jonas Sanker, here are the top Patriots fits available on draft weekend.

⏰ It's Big Board O'Clock!

Together with @mattstjean.bsky.social, Brian Hines and Pat Lane, here is our @patspulpit.bsky.social big board for the 2025 draft: the 50(ish) best fits for the Patriots.

Grab a coffee and take some time, it's a long one. Thanks for reading.

This is the only guide you'll need for corners in the 2025 class.

Check it out.

I just wouldn't have him on my board

Outside of Bond I'm a fan

Our NFL Draft Big Board has more than 200 players listed. Take a look, click on the player to see his scouting report.

Plus check out our full suite of analytic data that gives you a new way to look at players at each position

nfldraft.sportsinfosolutions.com

These are fun, I'm a fan.

big shadow docket decision coming: can the us government exile you to a torture prison overseas vs no it can't

Patriot Nation Podcast:Wide Receiver breakdown with Matt Waldman Pat and Matt are joined by Matt Waldman, creator of the Rookie Scouting Portfolio to discuss pass catchers in this year's draft. Before they get into that, t...

Had the pleasure of having the one and only @mattwaldman.bsky.social on the podcast last night to talk about the Patriots, wide receivers, and the NFL Draft.

You won't want to miss this!

Patriot Nation Podcast: Pass Catchers Breakdown with Matt Waldman Matt Waldman joins the show to talk about the top wide receivers and tight ends in the 2025 NFL Draft.🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out ...

Live now with the one and only Matt Waldman talking receivers and tight ends in the 2025 draft class!

Yeah this was a very good discussion! Definitely interested in hearing your thoughts once you do read it to see if it answered the questions you had or not

Yep! And the book itself is like 220 pages, it certainly is portraying itself more as a framework to solutions more than the solution to problems itself. Definitely isn't enough pages to solve all the world's problems lol

That's partially me reading into it, though. But the authors have issues with money in politics, and just because that isn't explicitly said in the book doesn't mean they think it's a good thing.

As for money in politics, I think the book is designed to work within the current system. There are obvious problems that need fixing, but we should be able to walk and chew gum here by finding ways to help people now to build the political will and power to pass rules to get money out of politics.

Yeah this almost makes me think he didn't read (or finish) the book, because the entire last chapter is about the success of Operation Warp Speed and how specifically the government can incentivize companies to do things to help people without getting ripped off the way Musk did stuff.

I do think this is where I'd recommend reading the book and going through many of the examples he lists with an open mind. It seems like corporate Dems and progressives alike have been at fault here, and so much of it is at the local level.

by well-intentioned liberals have been part of the reasoning for why so much money gets stuck in the hands of the wealthiest and allows them to maintain political power.

Yeah, I just don't agree with the implication here that these authors are here to make money to defend oligarchs. Both of them have been and continue to be advocates for higher taxes for the wealthy and strong state power to help the poor. A lot of the book is how policies aimed at helping the poor

Wouldn't it be better to get them into real housing that, let's say, isn't built using local union labor or may not have perfect ventilation systems than leave them out on the streets for years?

The argument was basically that the perfect was getting in the way of the good, and the outcome of all these self-imposed regulations on the government itself were forcing the homeless to stay in tents under an underpass for years longer than they needed to.

I think they view it as a dial, where you can turn it too far to be so focused on the process that ends no longer matter.

One example was an affordable housing building that had to meet all these crazy criteria to be built and took years and years to come together.

That said, yeah I didn't love the answer and I think he could have explained better and been more thorough.

If I'm remembering the context on that correctly, it was in response to the contention that private equity is responsible for housing prices going up.

I believe the point was that if you're ONLY viewing problems through the lens of corporations being the problem, then you'll miss other factors.