Looks like a Uelsmann
Posts by Michelle Moon
The 25th Amendment is an option available as soon as Republicans realize he is dooming them specifically more than the rest of us generally.
Looking at you, JD and Marco
But wait, are we sure it wasn’t this one, featuring a better look at the pilgrim outfit and sweaty kid? It’s kind of a trade off of wattle for chunky knees.
What photo? This one? 😏
She’s not all that famous in the US. Alice Paul, ida B. Wells, Lucy Stone, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Sojourner Truth, and Susan B Anthony are all much better known here. Anyway, movements aren’t reducible to the views of a single member .
"Queer Possibilities in Revolutionary America" as part of the America 250 Founding Feminists Series at @msmagazine.com msmagazine.com/2026/03/23/q...
Workers? That’s so 2025.
“Jane, you ignorant slut. When we men say “boots on the ground” we mean something you could never understand with your wee brain.”’
For the Rapture: Sort>Ascending
I’m not sure if you expect that to change the validity of my point, but it doesn’t. And it’s not a minority view any more. yougov.com/en-us/articl...
This is Nathan Cavanaugh, another DOGE staffer explaining how he flagged grants at NEH for "DEI" which would be reviewed for termination. 404 Media has reviewed hours of this footage and we'll have more soon.
Part of a lawsuit by @acls1919.bsky.social, @modernlanguage.bsky.social + @historians.org
This is the most illiterate use of the word “diversity” and it needs to stop. Diversity is a property of groups, not of individuals.
I don’t find that “external powers” to be true for me. Hope is an attitude I actively cultivate.
Right, no more rhetoric at all. Everyone just speak in bullet points.
Sure we need meaningful dialogue and immigration reform. How do you think we’re going to get it? We would be idiots to abandon these tools of Visibility that shift the window for that discussion: Slogans. Demonstration. Demands. Even Extreme demands that help define the limits of the possible.
We should still expect him to take the proposal seriously and explain clearly why he rejects that way forward.
Primary sources, they do tell
Or at least paid to give your betters and patrons a literate-seeming, semi-plausible reason to believe it? Come on! They need to links to email to their college friends and grandkids!
Oh…. Substack.
Let’s be looking for some competitor platforms that don’t espouse 8th-grade edgelord points of view.
"Hey I'm going back to the dildo box, I just had the idea to juggle them"
Cameraman who would later be arrested after singing "FASCIST DILDO CLEANUP CREW DOO DAH DOO DAH": @ckinferno.bsky.social
But don't ask him questions, he won't say shit ✊
(posted with permission)
In a normal world he’d be working at radio shack and we’d never have heard of him.
Alex Pretti honoring a deceased veteran at the VA ICU.
Does this seem like a "domestic terrorist" to you?
No, we just lost another kind soul like Renee. The world is a little dimmer.
Unintentional? It’s a semiquin mug.
You're paying for this.
Trump's Big Ugly Bill gave BILLIONS to ICE and giant corporations—using money meant to lower your health care costs.
Instead of helping your mom get cancer treatment, your tax dollars are being used to terrorize communities.
For this, leading activists:groups need to designate a central communications point person or source, direct everyone gebre, and use the folks to push the presaging you want. A Google
Doc will do, refer them to that.
I've made this many times.
Wrote this before yesterday but it gets at what undergirds that (and lots of other things in politics).
"The internet universalized subjectivity instead of objectivity. … We have reverted from acting on what we *know* to acting on what we *think*."
Because he’s functionally illiterate.
I love my two blackout drunk Minnesota sons
the precious