In a new paper, we find that judging facts by messenger rather than content leads to polarising belief packages (e.g. latte liberals, leftist support for wind power, rightist for nuclear). Worryingly, recommender algorithms use this strategy. No need to read the paper; you can just trust me on this.
Posts by Fredrik Jansson
How to convince others of what’s right and wrong: here is a popular-science press release presenting the findings from our latest paper. Arguments that don’t fit are filtered out, while those that connect to what already exists in your belief system get through and can force a reassessment.
Despite the current state of politics, moral views have become more progressive over time. Why? In an experiment we found that the arguments that make liberals more liberal also persuade conservatives, whereas the arguments that make conservatives more conservative don't persuade liberals.
💥New postdoc position! 💥
Join us to explore how people learn from each other—and how that drives cultural evolution.
Run experiments, build computational models & collaborate across Europe w. @lucasmolleman.bsky.social
📍 Stockholm
More info: shorturl.at/CY4wk
We're employing several PhD students in maths with opportunities to work on cultural evolution, societal consequences of AI, polarisation, discrimination and large language models. Apply by 6 May or please help us spread the message!
So, the spread of this post hinges more on whether, where and how I write it than on your attitude towards posts such as these.