@claynobles.bsky.social
@boxdonkey17.bsky.social
@gdad1x7.bsky.social
@kingresist.bsky.social
@pinkfloydlarson.bsky.social
@electroboyusa.bsky.social
@archeryfan93.bsky.social
@lochnerwalter.bsky.social
@dalewalls1.bsky.social
@dougieg633.bsky.social
@57kev.bsky.social
@fiona-webster22.bsky.social 🔄
🧐JUST IN: Pam Bondi is a trip! So, in an obvious effort to take the heat off of Trump, there are now TEN co-conspirators that were never charged in the #Epstein scandal. No names released though.
This regime needs to learn how to lie better.
This has Jan 6 undertones.
Why?
“We cannot let that happen”
What are they willing to do to stay in power?
Trump said the same words to the Jan 6 crowd.
www.npr.org/2021/02/10/9...
Who creates chaos?
His lawyers argued he was misunderstood.
Clear as day when you read through the speech.
The cause of everything America has faced has been plainly stated:
Everything is on the line in the midterms of 2026.
“The Radical left are going to impeach President Trump.
They are going to create absolute chaos.”
That says a lot about the education department being targeted.
Despite Republicans’ attempts to project an intelligent administration, they are proving their lack of it.
If they are this lacking, what of the leader who appointed them?
It fascinates me that core app functions on platforms like X are paid for.
What’s the point then of the app?
Revenue generation - not what they claim in their marketing lingo.
Prediction: China is stripping the US of market dominance.
Why?
Greed.
IT has become commoditised.
There are many ways to peel this onion.
This is a macro view - systems not psychological lens ( multi dimensional view of DJT).
To do that I have to see him as the 45th (9) and 47th (11) president that he is and see why the states is in bad shape.
9/11. Connected to JFK
The test asks for
thought alone = (Air) signs,
but
the image speaks
being in relationship
(F-fire:E:earth:W:water),
and the hippopotamus reminds us the above FEW cannot be separated which means:
Story without meaning is narrative soup.
We all know what we’ve been hearing since 2017: NS
Most people are taught only 5¹ (be yourself) and 5⁴ (be responsible)
They skip:
• reflection
• exploration
• surrender
For this reason : the test is labelled difficult - integration of reason with response.
From a systems thinking perspective: the Ws serve a systems function.
SELF = Presence
Identity State | Systems Fn
2: Self-relation | Feedback
3: Self-in-motion | 🦒 EXPLORATION
4: Self-in-responsibility | Stewardship
5: Self transcended | Integr8ion
THE QUIET INSIGHT
Cognitive Test as Archetypal Wheel:
THE FIVE 5s as a SYSTEM, not a LOOP.
This system is therefore Self moving through five domains, not five versions of ego.
In Astrological construction:
5 is the Leo ♌️ star sign - representing self
What do the rest of the 5s represent:
Identity State | Astro Key
2: Self-relation | ♌️ Leo
3: Self-in-motion | 🦒 GIRAFFE
4: Self-in-responsibility | Pisces
5: Self transcended | ♏️
👉🏽 Communication 101
👉🏽 journalism framework.
With the 5 Ws and H:
Who: What: Where: When:
Why: & How:
W - in numerology is the number 5.
Leads back to the 5th W.
Why?
By the time you reach H (How)
All the 5:5:5:5 must add up to discernment.
Discernment is the 20th card in the Major Arcana - about judgement.
His response to this test is that
“By the way, not easy.”
Truth: Multi-axis thinking is labelled “difficult”
This is when you tap into “Dual-Track Cognition”
• Track 1: Functional / system-compatible
• Track 2: Symbolic / integrative
No truth is trusted until it has been walked around.
How?
Why his description is revealing
“They show a 🦁, 🦒, 🐟 and a 🦛 … and they say “which is the giraffe.”
That task is:
• Perceptual matching
• Language-label recognition
• Roughly equivalent to an early childhood or geriatric screening item.
Those tests include very basic items such as:
• Object recognition
• Naming animals
• Simple recall
• Orientation (date, place)
They are designed so that healthy adults almost always pass.
It is used to rule out dementia and major IMPAIRMENT, not to assess INTELLIGENCE, REASONING depth, or EXECUTIVE JUDGEMENT.
What Trump is describing 👇🏽 is not a meaningful “cognitive test” in the way the phrase is commonly understood. Let’s unpack narrative distortions.
What test is he referring to?
He is alluding to the MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) or a screening-style Neuro-cognitive exam.
3:6:9 is there from Nikola Tesla as a clue. What clue?
As he stated: in understanding how the universe works.
They (Trump et al) use words to confound the wise because words come from Horizontal axis - Ego
Numbers come from Vertical axis - Spirit.
This is point for religion - it is legion not truth.
If the Christians who lambast non Christians claim to be led by spirit, they would know that numbers - from the void (9) to expression (3), took 6 days.
That’s me done.
What Nikola Tesla discovered about the number 3:6:9
3: connects you to creation,
6: to duality (6), and
9: to completion/the void (9
Most people use this as a manifestation tool. That is not its primary purpose.
3: Gemini (Duality)
6: Virgo (Duality
9: Sagittarius (Duality)
Why am I going down this rabbit hole:
I am master number eleven = Birthday
I am master number 33 = Surname
Master number 11 - speaks to knowledge which turns into insight.
Master number 33 - speaks to Christ Consciousness.
Back to initials C(3) C(3) as a synthesis of the 33:
He is a bridge between the past (JFK) and the present (DJT)
What is the common denominator? Israel.
What is JFK’s purpose saying to Americans?
Do you see what is really happening in our nation?
Until you do - these type of “events” will continue and progressively escalate.
I believe they have.
Here is where you need to ask yourself questions:
Erika Kirk refers to her late husband as a Bridge.
A bridge to what - instability?
He certainly was not a bridge as JFK was destined to be.
But Charlie is the bridge for collective US consciousness to pay closer attention to what is unfolding.
His role was to expose collective pattern instability - but he did not by himself, resolve or translate it.
In other words:
He was a STRUCTURAL AMPLIFIER, not a translator or reconciler.
Where does Charlie Kirk sit?
He functioned as an activator of high-voltage narrative structure - not to resolve tension, not to mediate, not to TRANSLATE, and not to stabilise -
but to ESCALATE structural narrative intensity.
In Charlie Kirk’s signature, we see:
movement + self-assertion + structural builder energy
→ but without relational (6) or reflective (7) anchoring
This produces a different signal dysregulation - not just polarity and aggression - but unanchored narrative generation.
This combination is experienced as:
Movement without depth → output without integration → signal without containment
Watch his videos to comprehend what this is saying. He hurled insults when not able to articulate himself.
To me, it’s narrative vomit - many contradictions - coherence vector lack
But, Charlie had low grounding in relational/ethical mediation
• No internal 6 (care / ethical relational grounding)
• No 7 (reflective integration)
• No apparent threshold buffering before structural assertion
What this looks like in function
A 5:1:22 signature produces:
⚡ High signal intensity
• High movement
• Rapid narrative outputs
• Strong self-framing
Debates were rapid narrative outputs for him.
Self framing is where he is challenged.
