Kathleen Stock on the new chair of Stonewall.
archive.is/202604210840...
www.thetimes.com/comment/colu...
Posts by alan_b
Bound to happen sooner or later.
Tell us the highlights. I don't want to give them the advertising revenue.
... I accept that information that I should have had, and information that the house should have had, should have been before the House.
But I did not mislead the House, and that’s why I’ve set out the account in full."
Doesn't appear to be taking responsibility for his own mistakes.
But today, when the Tory John Lamont asked Starmer if he accepted he had “inadvertently misled the House of Commons”, Starmer replied:
I did not mislead the House of Commons.
Sunak's wife and her father were not appointed to diplomatic positions without developed vetting. There is this thing called "whataboutery", you may have heard of it. There seems to be a lot of it about today. From the Guardian live blog:
"Starmer, they say, has no ability to manage a team; an aversion to conflict; no guiding mission for power; no energy to drive change; little interest in people; and no interest in political strategy."
So, he's a husk of a man, promoted to the top job because of his vacuity.
infestation. Both of them have repeatedly shown themselves to be incapable of the job. The main problem is that there is no obvious capable successor.
No. There are no other diplomatic posts comparable to the Washington embassy. The frenzied effort by his supporters to convince us that there's nothing to see here are similar to BoJo's ministers claiming that the PM could not be changed because Ukraine, COVID and Dylin the dog having a nasty flea
thecritic.co.uk/chopping-the...
"One of the difficulties of being on the non-mad side of the gender wars is that the other side’s arguments are so mad, it sounds as though you’re making them up."
Great piece in The Critic by Jenny Lindsay on the censoring of Afterlife by Gutter and what it says about the decay of our literary culture.
thecritic.co.uk/literary-fre...
Don't speak ill of the sheep.
"She added that some people had been surprised to be having a conversation about sex with an MP, but believes that “just means it was needed”. "
Now is that having a conversation "about sex with an MP", or
having a "conversation about sex" with an MP?
Of course we should, the question is 'would they want us to?'.
Oor Party
From the review:
"By 2020, Women's Place was publicly labelled a 'hate group' by multiple branches of government"
Really? You'll be able to give references and tell us which branches and even which government, then.
Publically
"The link you followed may be broken or the page may have been removed."
The Telegraph just gave a convicted criminal a two-page spread to explain why he's pumping £4 million into Reform UK. They tucked his criminal record away in the small print. So as a former financial crime specialist I’ll do their job for them👇
Stroud brewery admitting that they cancelled a booking because of the perceived views of the interviewees.
I listened to the usually excellent @11kbw.bsky.social employment law blog on the recent ET cases on single-sex spaces. www.legalfeminist.org.uk/2026/03/25/p...
As always, Blackadder explains it.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw6H...
So there were 162 in 2016, around the time that the dramatic increase in referrals started. How many by the time the Tavistock was closed down?
"Carmichael herself questioned how the blocker might be working: ‘So I guess there is a question about why none, none stop once they’ve started on the blocker more or less,’ she mused to the audience of gender clinicians."
From Hannah Barnes's "Time to Think"
"In 2016, Polly Carmichael explained to the world’s leading figures in transgender healthcare that ‘only two’ out of the 162 children GIDS had now referred had stopped treatment.
I find it upsetting when the grown ups fight, so please don't.
I think you're wrong on the numbers though, Margaret.
It's the very accurate test for the SRY gene which makes foetuses develop on the male pathway; it's what makes a male a male, and that's quite significant.
Only where those genetic advantages are testicles. No hostility, only setting boundaries.