Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by grumpus 🍉

Post image

Me making a new alt

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

theyre calling him the sluttiest man at the gala of gifts

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

I see u, lynch fanboy connections writer

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

U need to be in the storm, but they do take a while!

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

because hes a white male republican

1 year ago 461 2 0 0

i can be sitting in my chair and all of a sudden sweat is dripping from my armpits, wtf

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Man what would azeroth do without me

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Post image Post image

Can someone at blizz PLS downscale the waist on body 2 dwarfs i am BEGGING!!! Theres no way these are supposed to look like this

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

ZandalaRuPaul is hosting Snatch Game - I’m seeing a Garrosh, a Chromie, a Sylvanas, a Tyrande, & Onyxia’s Disembodied Head

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

are there TikTok compilations on youtube yet or should i just watch jenna marbles old ones while i wait

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

hes so right for this

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

That one friend who is too woke

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Without downloading any new pics, where are you mentally?

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

The gem-as-bellybutton is inspired

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

One of my 2024 resolutions was to be more stylish, but ive just caught myself lusting after sweaters on coldwater creeks website, so its safe to say thats a resolution i will not be meeting

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
targets, the District Court reasonably concluded that the balance of the equities tips toward
preliminary relief pending full consideration of the merits. Its analysis of the last two
preliminary injunction factors was not arbitrary or unreasonable. The court did not
manifestly abuse its discretion, and its injunction was not overbroad.
156 Finally, both parties have submitted notices of supplemental authority, citing recent
cases considering challenges to various laws regarding gender-affirming care. Without
exception, the additional authority pertains to claims grounded in the equal protection
clause or otherwise based on alleged unlawful discrimination. Some of the authorities also
reference new developments in research and evidence that was not part of the record
presented to the District Court in the preliminary injunction proceedings. Because, on the
record here, the District Court's conclusions on Montana's express privacy protections are
sufficient to uphold its preliminary injunction, we affirm on that basis. The parties will
have the opportunity during the merits proceeding for full development of the record, where their experts may offer insight on any new research, and for briefing on the current case law relative to their claims.
CONCLUSION
157 The District Court made no error of law and did not manifestly abuse its discretion.
We affirm its grant of a preliminary injunction on the basis of Plaintiffs' right to privacy claim. The case will proceed to trial, at which point the District Court will finally resolve the disputed facts and issue a final determination on the constitutional issues presented.
/S/ BETH BAKER
32
We Concur:
/S/ MIKE McGRATH
/S/ LAURIE MCKINNON
/S/ INGRID GUSTAFSON /S/ DIRK M. SANDEFUR
/S/ JAMES JEREMIAH SHEA

targets, the District Court reasonably concluded that the balance of the equities tips toward preliminary relief pending full consideration of the merits. Its analysis of the last two preliminary injunction factors was not arbitrary or unreasonable. The court did not manifestly abuse its discretion, and its injunction was not overbroad. 156 Finally, both parties have submitted notices of supplemental authority, citing recent cases considering challenges to various laws regarding gender-affirming care. Without exception, the additional authority pertains to claims grounded in the equal protection clause or otherwise based on alleged unlawful discrimination. Some of the authorities also reference new developments in research and evidence that was not part of the record presented to the District Court in the preliminary injunction proceedings. Because, on the record here, the District Court's conclusions on Montana's express privacy protections are sufficient to uphold its preliminary injunction, we affirm on that basis. The parties will have the opportunity during the merits proceeding for full development of the record, where their experts may offer insight on any new research, and for briefing on the current case law relative to their claims. CONCLUSION 157 The District Court made no error of law and did not manifestly abuse its discretion. We affirm its grant of a preliminary injunction on the basis of Plaintiffs' right to privacy claim. The case will proceed to trial, at which point the District Court will finally resolve the disputed facts and issue a final determination on the constitutional issues presented. /S/ BETH BAKER 32 We Concur: /S/ MIKE McGRATH /S/ LAURIE MCKINNON /S/ INGRID GUSTAFSON /S/ DIRK M. SANDEFUR /S/ JAMES JEREMIAH SHEA

Incredible news! Montana’s Supreme Court just affirmed that the state’s gender affirming care ban is likely unconstitutional.

This makes the state the first state Supreme Court to rule that trans medical care is protected.

This applies REGARDLESS of what the US Supreme Court does.

1 year ago 9891 2344 118 127
1 year ago 169 11 1 0

Read reddit’s AITA brainslop :/

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

The screenshot of the day imo

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

Literally!

1 year ago 5 0 0 0

I'm an ally to whatever you got going on

1 year ago 7 1 1 0

Its literally the only slide i immediately skip

1 year ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

shes looking for what just made the squeaking in the new holiday music mix youtube video :)

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

So glad to see Fox News and LibsofTikTok condemning violence against healthcare CEOs. As we all know, the only acceptable calls for violence are against random gay teachers and trans people.

1 year ago 4882 701 101 6
Preview
a drawing of a person with the word yippee written on it ALT: a drawing of a person with the word yippee written on it
1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Omg thank u blizz for making this specifically for me!!! so sweet of u!!!

1 year ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

the right will accuse anyone who cares about any cause at all of virtue signaling, so we should diagnose it correctly when it actually happens: blithe non-statements ("murder is bad") used to convey to elite peers that you can overlook systemic violence as needed ("additional comment not necessary")

1 year ago 1805 177 39 3

I am shopping for black (combat) boots and my fear of looking like a white supremacist is flaring up

1 year ago 0 0 0 0