Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by

Following barista strike, Starbucks agrees to bargain with union - union still calls on allies to delete Starbucks app and not buy any Starbucks until agreement is reached

Following barista strike, Starbucks agrees to bargain with union - union still calls on allies to delete Starbucks app and not buy any Starbucks until agreement is reached

Collective action matters. When we fight, we win. ✊

4 weeks ago 472 158 5 10
Preview
MSPB update: probationary employee terminations, RIFs, and more This post summarizes the current state of litigation at the MSPB in several important areas. (Given the large volume of appeals and the fact that MSPB dockets are not public, we can’t provide…

We've posted an update on MSPB litigation challenging the probationary employee terminations, RIFs, and more: federalworkerrights.com/2026/03/16/m...

1 month ago 3 2 0 0

Starbucks seems obsessed with spending millions boosting CEO pay, executive bonuses, and more money for shareholders, but they’re failing the baristas who make all their profits possible. RT if you agree!

3 months ago 97 39 0 1
Preview
Wins, Losses, and the Future of Federal Worker Lawsuits Litigation saved the jobs of approximately 17,000 probationary employees, prevented the closure of some agencies, and revealed weaknesses in the “channeling doctrine.” But most of the k…

New blog post summarizing this year's litigation over the federal workforce, highlighting some key victories for federal workers in the face of unprecedented attacks: federalworkerrights.com/2025/12/29/w...

3 months ago 3 2 0 0

New post in a planned series looking back at this year's war over the federal workforce: federalworkerrights.com/2025/12/18/d...

4 months ago 1 2 1 0

Rather than respecting the right of its doctors to advocate for better working conditions and care for patients, University Hospitals in Ohio chose to fire pediatricians Drs. Beene and Fouts-Fowler for speaking up.

University Hospitals must immediately reinstate these doctors.

4 months ago 800 208 17 9

Why was the post about Mendelson being open to appointing a Republican deleted? Is he not in fact considering appointing a Republican?

4 months ago 1 0 1 0

Janeese Lewis George also donated to Aparna - get your facts straight!

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

Indiana’s Senate has voted AGAINST the GOP gerrymander that’d have locked in a 9-0 map.

This keeps the 7-2 map in place, saving two Democratic seats heading into 2026.

The vote failed big, 19/31.

The MAJORITY of the GOP senators opposed it!

4 months ago 11253 2101 307 365
Advertisement

James & Hoffman is proud to represent former EPA employees who were fired for signing a letter in their personal time that criticized government policy--a violation of their free speech rights under the First Amendment.

4 months ago 7 1 0 0
Preview
Starbucks Investors Call on Company to Restart Negotiations with Union Baristas - Starbucks Workers United “We write as long-term shareholders of Starbucks Corporation to express our concern regarding the current state of Starbucks’ labor relations and urge the company to restart negotiations and promptly ...

NEW: In a new letter, Starbucks investors are expressing concern over the company's sustainability, "as evidenced by more than one hundred Unfair Labor Practice complaints filed this year, worker protests, and threats to strike."

Read their letter to the board:

sbworkersunited.org/starbucks-in...

6 months ago 96 27 1 5
Table of contents of government brief opposing a TRO of Shutdown RIFs. Where page numbers should be, the document says, "ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED"

Table of contents of government brief opposing a TRO of Shutdown RIFs. Where page numbers should be, the document says, "ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED"

Here's the error-filled table of contents of the Government's brief opposing a TRO of the shutdown RIFs

6 months ago 194 49 4 20
Russ Vought v @russvought
The RIFs have begun.
12:27 PM • 10/10/25 • 15K Views

Russ Vought v @russvought The RIFs have begun. 12:27 PM • 10/10/25 • 15K Views

Three key points:
1) The admin has been planning mass firings to begin in October since February
2) The work necessary to carry out mass firings is illegal during a shutdown, violating the Antideficiency Act, which carries a criminal penalty
3) This harms America, ridding us of talent and expertise

6 months ago 6134 2338 223 103
Preview
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL CIO v. United States Office of Management and..., 3:25-cv-08302 - CourtListener.com Docket for American Federation of Government Employees, AFL CIO v. United States Office of Management and..., 3:25-cv-08302 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating hig...

Judge Ilston previously scheduled a hearing for October 16 on a TRO to stop the shutdown RIFs. Lawsuit filed by AFGE and AFSCME. Docket here: www.courtlistener.com/docket/71502...

6 months ago 8 4 0 0
Preview
Impact of Government Shutdown on Federal Workers' Cases Learn how the federal government shutdown impacts filing deadlines for MSPB, EEO investigations, and EEOC cases. Stay informed and prepared.

All MSPB filing deadlines will be extended over the course of the government shutdown. Learn more about how the shutdown will impact federal workers' cases here:
federalworkerrights.com/2025/10/03/w...

6 months ago 5 2 0 0
Post image

🚨 Sen. Elizabeth Warren and HUD whistleblowers are speaking out. HUD Secretary Scott Turner, other political appointees, are dismantling civil-rights enforcement, placing HUD on “an unalterable course” toward violating federal law and endangering the public. www.federalunionists.net/press/whistl...

7 months ago 34 11 1 2
Advertisement
Preview
Trump Appointees Roll Back Enforcement of Fair Housing Laws Interviews and internal documents show that signature civil rights protections in housing are being dismissed as ideologically driven and D.E.I. in disguise.

The Trump administration is limiting enforcement of fair housing laws, dismissing them as ideologically driven and DEI in disguise, according to interviews and internal documents reviewed by The New York Times.

7 months ago 149 105 35 38
Preview
Starbucks workers sue over company's new dress code Starbucks workers are taking legal action against the coffee giant, saying it violated the law when it changed its dress code but refused to reimburse employees who had to buy new clothes.

“I think it’s extremely tone deaf on the company’s part to expect their employees to completely redesign their wardrobe without any compensation."

“A lot of us are already living paycheck to paycheck.”

7 months ago 53 14 1 0

NYT today. Same edition as @erikloomis.bsky.social call to action.

Starbucks workers are ready to fight. Who’s with them?

7 months ago 14 4 0 0

The occupation makes us all less safe in DC and across the country. It’s destroying lives, ripping families apart, and increasing violence.

The Mayor’s choice to praise it is a massive betrayal, especially as neighbors desperately try to protect each other in the absence of government support.

7 months ago 360 81 21 6

Are you a lawyer interested in litigating against the Trump administration in defense of federal employees? This job might be for you: www.jamhoff.com/jhrecruit/. Feel free to DM for more info.

8 months ago 11 4 1 0

Starbucks has the worst CEO-to-worker pay ratio out of all major companies, with their CEO making 6,666x more than the average employee last year.

8 months ago 1847 630 70 37
Preview
Federal Worker Rights Visit the post for more.

Exciting news: our class action for fired probationary workers at the Department of Interior was just granted! DOI workers can learn more about what will happen next at federalworkerrights.com

LINK: www.reuters.com/legal/govern...

9 months ago 11 3 1 0
Preview
FEMA Didn’t Answer Thousands of Calls From Flood Survivors, Documents Show

FEMA didn’t answer thousands of calls from flood survivors, documents show; agency struggled because call center contracts weren’t extended www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/c... via @nytimes.com

9 months ago 573 231 39 9
You Are Not Alone: A Resource Guide for Civil Servants Affected by the Supreme Court’s RIF Decision | Civil Service Strong Resource guide for civil servants affected by the Supreme Court's RIF decision on Tuesday, July 8th, 2025.

Guide from Civil Service Strong on next steps after the Supreme Court's RIF decision: www.civilservicestrong.org/resources/yo...

9 months ago 7 5 1 0
Preview
Why didn’t the Supreme Court address channeling in its RIF decision? An interesting aspect of yesterday’s Supreme Court decision on RIFs is that it doesn’t mention the so-called “channeling doctrine.” This doctrine provides that federal employees generally cannot go…

We have another post on yesterday's RIF decision: Why didn't the Supreme Court address channeling? federalworkerrights.com/2025/07/09/w...

9 months ago 3 3 0 0
Advertisement

Posted late last night regarding the Supreme Court’s RIF decision:

9 months ago 4 1 1 0

Here's our post on the Supreme Court decison permitting RIFs to move forward at 22 agencies. It's a major setback for federal employees, but many options remain open for challenging RIFs. federalworkerrights.com/2025/07/08/w...

9 months ago 6 2 0 1