A poster about the online webinar titled "Race, Housing and EU Law: The CJEU and the Danish Housing Case, Case 417/23) The Institute of European and Comparative Law (IECL) of the University of Oxford and the European Law Review bring together in discussion leading academics, including Professor Tamara Ćapeta, Advocate General in Case C-417/23. The speakers are: Tamara Ćapeta has served as Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Union since October 2021. She was previously a Professor of EU Law at the University of Zagreb, where she co-founded the Department of European Public Law and led several major academic initiatives. Her work focuses on judicial legitimacy and the constitutional dimensions of EU law. Bruno de Witte is Emeritus Professor of European Union Law at Maastricht University and a part-time Professor at the European University Institute. A leading scholar of EU constitutional law, his work covers the relationship between European, national, and international legal orders, the protection of fundamental rights, and the cultural and linguistic diversity of Europe. Hanna Eklund is Assistant Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Copenhagen. She holds a PhD in European Law from the European University Institute and is the Principal Investigator of the project Colonialism and EU Law: Writing Legal Histories for the Future. Her research focuses on EU law, constitutionalism, and the relationship between law and social change. Nozizwe Dube is a PhD candidate in EU law at Maastricht University, within the Department of International Law. Her research offers a critical race feminist analysis of the EU equality framework, with a focus on intersectional discrimination and the role of decoloniality in European legal structures. In 2023, she was selected as one of the twelve Faces of Science by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Last month, @eucourtofjustice.bsky.social issued its judgment on the Danish 'Ghetto' Law (C-417/23). Given the paucity of preliminary reference rulings about the Race Equality Directive, this judgment warrants some unpacking.
Join us to discuss the 'Ghetto Housing' judgment tomorrow: bit.ly/4qcbvnX
