It's official: Australia's teen social media ban isn't working, yet. www.crikey.com.au/2026/03/31/a...
Posts by John Perrino
Tremendously proud to be part of an organization supporting communities in 150 countries across six continents! 🌐
From helping connect communities to the Internet, to keeping people safe online we think global and act local.
👩⚖️ The Supreme Court may not be the “nine greatest experts on the Internet,” in the words of Justice Kagan, but this ruling shows a strong understanding of how Internet connectivity works.
The ruling is a victory for the Internet and millions of people who rely on shared online access!
🏘️ 🏫 🏨 The ruling protects hotels and coffee shops with dozens of daily guests, universities with thousands of students, and the many small Internet service providers that serve rural communities.
🛜 Many Internet connections are shared. A single subscriber account may be used by a household or even dozens, hundreds, or thousands of people.
🛠 The Internet Society filed an amicus brief last year explaining what’s at stake in the case and providing clear technical explanations of how Internet connections work.
🚫 The case, Cox v. Sony, considered whether Internet service providers should be held liable and forced to cut off Internet connections for allegations that someone illegally downloaded or shared copyrighted music.
A unanimous Supreme Court ruling yesterday protects Internet access for millions of people while upholding clear online copyright protections. 🏛️ 🌐
These may not be the nine greatest experts on the Internet, but the Supreme Court made the right decision to protect people's online access in Cox v. Sony today.
What could go wrong? We'll see.
From a leaked draft:
The data privacy regulator, ANPD, must define "verifiable credentials" (Art. 24) and outline measures they'll take to limit circumvention (Art. 28).
Brazil's youth online safety law (ECA Digital) goes into effect tomorrow. 🇧🇷
📜 In theory, age checks have privacy, security, transparency, and inclusivity requirements.
🛠️ In practice, the nascent online safety regulator must write rules for “verifiable credentials,” and limit circumvention.
Sure, there is a risk of overreach. But sometimes a little common sense can help address the worst of the worst online.
Congress and advocacy groups should be embarrassed to drag parents who lost their children to a partisan hearing on bad legislation that won't protect children online.
Do better! There are so many actual experts ready to help.
I wrote on this years ago with Stanford's Jennifer King.
New piece by @mluria.bsky.social and me on what today's hearing on kids' safety is missing: the perspectives of parents and teens who are deeply skeptical of whether these bills will meet their needs. Huge thanks to @viacristiano.bsky.social for his sharp edits. www.techpolicy.press/congress-chi...
House E&C is marking up a bunch of kids online safety bills today. Some familiar faces, like COPPA 2.0 and KOSA, have been revised. Some interesting design-related bills wrapped up in "Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act" package. Unfort. its combined w/ some serious anti-privacy/censorship bills.
Representative Jake Auchincloss speaks during a congressional vote.
Congressman Jake Auchincloss at today's House committee vote on a supposed children's online safety package:
“This is a blank check to Big Tech and Democrats are going to stand against it.”
It's hard to believe. The one agency that enforces the one (already ineffective) rule against exploiting children's data online.
The FTC just announced that the only national law protecting children's data online won't apply to age verification.
You know. The Federal Trade Commission. The agency that's in charge of keeping people safe and enforcing the only rules on the books to protect children online. 🤦♂️
A global digital identity verification provider for the fintech, financial, and insurance industries exposed a billion personal records including national IDs, phone numbers, and addresses.
But don't worry, they'll delete your ID... at some point.
The law has a provision that invalidates the ban if TikTok is acquired by a company incorporated outside China or other "foreign adversaries."
It was likely to be dismissed following the divestment deal's completion.
The law, SB 419, was passed in 2023 and would have entirely banned TikTok in Montana. Not just government devices or teens—everybody.
TikTok and the Montana Attorney General's Office appear to have requested the court dismiss a case challenging the state's TikTok ban in a filing made today.
That case, TikTok v. Knudsen, was on hold during the national saga resulting from the divest or ban law and executive orders.
Russia is attempting to fully block WhatsApp for its more than 100 million users inside the country.
I'm surprised WhatsApp lasted this long, but many Russians rely on it for a secure connection to the rest of the world.
Russian users are being pushed to a government-backed app, MAX.
We need to continue to develop policy and technology to address online harms.
Section 230 isn't perfect, but weakening it won’t fix those challenges—it would endanger how the Internet works and our ability to interact online.
🚫 Section 230 is NOT a "censorship" tool. It enables people to post and share content without first requiring corporate or government review.
What doesn’t Section 230 do?
🚫 Section 230 is NOT a “get out of jail free” card for online services, big or small. Online services must remove illegal content and address criminal activity.
🌐 It protects services that move the “0s and 1s” of code that make up the Internet so that you can watch a video, make a purchase, or get the latest news.
🤝 It enables platforms to moderate content for safer and more welcoming online communities.
🧑💻 Policymakers created Section 230 for you, an Internet user, to share and access content more freely online.