onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

Hi Paul Bruno,

Thanks for sharing my work :)

Best wishes from Denmark

3: Whether it is most viable to act as a Squire, Chieftain, Maverick or Diplomat in a particular situation is explained by the relative distribution of preferences and information among the public manager and their principals and agents.

Here is a link to the article: shorturl.at/8Pt8L

1: Public managers are principals and agents at the same time

2: In this dual role they may prioritize loyalty towards their own principals (be a Squire), prioritize maintaining credibility with their agents (be a Chieftain), prioritize neither (be a Maverick) or prioritize both (be a Diplomat).

First post on Bluesky!

I just published a new open access article in @pareview.bsky.social that develops a theory on the role of public managers in the political-administrative hierarchy. Here is a short thread with the main points 🧵