Whuuuut? An amazing accomplishment! Congrats!
Posts by Jessica Green
Proposed LNG power plant in Vietnam gets scrapped, as a result of the war on Iran. Will be replaced with a a renewable energy and battery storage project
I guess policymakers & pundits touting LNG in Canada aren't reading international news....
www.reuters.com/sustainabili...
The game of chicken in the strait of Hormuz will not end well.
Textbook example of why Canada desperately needs to work on a) where in the EV supply chain it can best add value & b) policies to actually attract investment.
Pointless to say "no deal" without any kind of counterproposal.
The longer Doug Ford goes around pitching his latest greatest idea to expand Billy Bishop airport without any real plan or actual numbers, the more time for Toronto policymakers and voters will have to mobilize and oppose.
I think this is a fight that Toronto can win.
Thank you!!! 🙏
if you read one thing today ..... read Jessica Green author of existential politics - pointing out the elephant in the room on #climate policy
Shout out to my beach peeps!
whoa.
I spend much of the summer on the #Toronto Islands. It's an urban oasis, a true gem & a site of real community. So it was a privilege to discuss how Ford's proposal to expand Billy Bishop airport will threaten this amazing place. Tune in to @therundowntvo.bsky.social tonight to hear me explain why.
I mean, you're not wrong. But the fight between these opposing interests is intensifying for sure.
Here in Canada, fossil assets owners making the argument that they can provide stability and big returns in the short term. Blerg.
LOL
Great thread, but maybe indicates an inexorability to energy transition. It overlooks:
a) OECD countries still pumping billions into FF subsidies, distorting the competition.
b) Tech diffusion means that fossil asset owners will dig in their heels EVEN HARDER claiming they can provide stability.
Industrial policy nerds: what conditions make this panicked switching behaviour more permanent?
Oil price spikes lead those that can to switch to clean tech. But how long does this have to last to meaningfully influence firms' L-T planning / cap investments in producing more green tech?
Anyone?
Of course
Even the oldest and largest emissions trading scheme is unable to withstand the political pressures of energy price volatility caused by Iran war. We will likely see others follow suit.
Does not bode well for this problematic policy.
This is THE question imho. Obvi we need federal leadership, but in its absence (ahem Canada), subnational efforts can provide models to emulate.
The war will not magically end political coalitions supporting oil and gas, but we know quite a bit about how it might help further push us in the right direction. #askapoliticalscientist /FIN
5/ The size of the “decarbonizable industries” can help – ag, metals, car manufacturers, some utilities can be “flipped” to be green asset owners with gov’t incentives. This helps splinter previously larger fossil coalitions & build momentum for further decarb
4/ In democratic countries, corporatist arrangements do better because gov’ts work with industry to create politically palatable bargains to facilitate the energy transition.
3/ Export-led economies generally do better than service-oriented economies at creating political coalitions in support of green investments. @jonasnahm.com work helpful on this.
2/ Green industrial policy can help win over industry opponents and if/when it produces jobs, consumer subsidies and/or growth, the public too. Dolla dolla bills y’all.
See chap 7 of my new book on this.
Lots of speculation rn (such as this FT article) on what war in the Middle East means for the future of oil.
What do we know about the conditions under which we reach tipping points in clean energy adoption?
Political science can tell us a lot! 🧵
2/ Best guess? Unilateral US mining will either:
Start a free for all in the deep seabed
Push states to finalize mining regs thru ISA.
Best case scenario? It *could* generate anti-US backlash & states support for a moratorium (this happened in Antarctica!), but I wouldn’t bet on it. FIN
1/ Latest negotiations failed to make progress on a mining code. This is a win for NGOs & others supporting a moratorium.
BUT…
The longer the delay on multilateral rules, the more time the US has to pursue unilateral mining. Permitting is moving quickly & mining will follow shortly thereafter.
In case you haven’t been following at home, the multilateral rules governing deep sea mining are in a VERY precarious place. Either plausible outcome seems…not good. Mini 🧵
The word "if" doing a lot of heavy lifting here...