Thanks Andrew. Even though I’d have disagreed, for obvious reasons, if the Tribunal had said the post-holder *couldn’t* be named, I think it’s actually worse/more insidious for the T to decline to name them because the name of a witness isn’t *relevant*.
Posts by
In which I get pompous and hyperbolic about some minor withholding of information in a First-tier Tribunal judgment informationrightsandwrongs.com/2026/04/23/o...
I think it failed because the Policy doc was robust and well drafted. Much of the evidence the claimants tried unsuccessfully to get admitted was aimed at the LFR itself, and not the Policy. The courts are very careful not to allow a JR claim to become an activist weapon (see paras 4 and 5)
The High Court has refused the an application for judicial review of the Met Police’s policy on deployment of live facial recognition. Another on my personal blog: informationrightsandwrongs.com/2026/04/22/j...
The Court of Appeal has restored some calm, and business certainty, by overturning the prior decision of the High Court in RTM v Bonne Terre: a data subject’s consent is to be assessed objectively, not subjectively. On my personal blog informationrightsandwrongs.com/2026/04/22/c...
Oh you have got to be kidding me. What service is that from?
The ICO has declined to suggest in its guidance how long controllers should normally take to respond to data subject complaints. I think this is a missed opportunity. On my personal blog:
informationrightsandwrongs.com/2026/02/13/d...
The ICO no longer has to establish that cookie contraventions are likely to cause significant damage or distress before issuing a fine. Will it lead to flurry of fines? (Hint: not under the current regime). Still a noteworthy change though @mishcondereya.bsky.social www.mishcon.com/news/unlawfu...
I've written for the @mishcondereya.bsky.social website on some of the more significant changes wrought by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 which commence today (5 February) www.mishcon.com/news/data-pr...
I’m happy to confess I assumed the absoluteness extended to NCND. I’d imagine the ICO’s position would be that s40(5) is a subordinate part of s40(2), and so NCND carries across, but the reference to Coppel in the judgment indicates that there’s been this contrary view for some time
On my personal blog: FTT rather dismantles @ICOnews on both the facts and the law in this remarkable FOI judgment. Will the ICO have to rewrite their section 40 NCND guidance? informationrightsandwrongs.com/2025/11/29/n...
It’s not my area at all, but see CPR 81, and 81.9 in particular - the court has the power to commit to prison or issue an (unlimited) fine www.justice.gov.uk/courts/proce...
One of those initialisms that is almost a standard word for those practising in data protection and privacy, so much so that it didn’t occur to me to spell it out (but will edit to do so now)
After all these years, I see that a social media post by @davidallengreen.bsky.social can have a remarkable booster effect on the visits to one’s blog
Incredible story. The ICO should absolutely now be paying the force some real attention given the potential wider implications for FOI requests and subject access requests.
I’ve written on my personal blog about an extraordinary CoA judgment in which the Chief Constable of Northants Police has been found in contempt over egregious BWV disclosure failings informationrightsandwrongs.com/2025/11/13/c...
The MoD has said it cannot say whether it has had any spreadsheet-based data breaches following the catastrophic Afghan citizen one, because it would take >237 hours to find out. On my personal blog informationrightsandwrongs.com/2025/11/07/m...
And to this day no one knows where that guitar disappeared to at the end
I’m especially ticked off that he likes Au Hasard, Balthazar, as that’s been my go-to pseuds-cornerish answer to “what’s your favourite film?” for 35 years. Now I have to find another one
I’ve written on my personal blog on the still-unclear question of why one very large charity received “public sector” lenience from the ICO - and a 97.5% reduction in proposed fine - while a few months later a tiny charity didn’t informationrightsandwrongs.com/2025/07/29/i...
I’ve written up my thoughts for the @mishcondereya.bsky.social website, on the baffling decision by the ICO to take no action in response to the most catastrophic data breach in UK history, which exposed many thousands of people to immediate risk to their lives.
www.mishcon.com/news/data-pr...
Kate, I don’t even mind (all that much) the lack of holding to account - it’s the failure to take the opportunity to educate the public about something that has happened much too often, and puts lives at risk
Today we heard about the most catastrophic data breach in UK history. And the ICO’s response? No need for any action.
Not. Good. Enough.
www.linkedin.com/posts/jon-ba...
A largely overlooked but significant change wrought by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 means that, in principle, it will be *much* easier for the ICO to issue fines for cookies contravention I've written about this for the @Mishcon_de_Reya website www.mishcon.com/news/fines-f...
I’ve written for the Mishcon de Reya website on the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 and the changes it will make to the UK’s data protection laws
www.mishcon.com/news/how-wil...
A man on remand for assaulting his ex-partner duped former employer, JD Wetherspoon, into orally disclosing her mother’s mobile phone number, which he then used to continue his abuse. I’ve written on my personal blog about the case which has resulted informationrightsandwrongs.com/2025/06/29/o...
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 has now been published. NB that most of the operative data protection provisions still need secondary legislation to commence them www.linkedin.com/posts/jon-ba...
A blogpost on what the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 will do. It’s essentially an amending statute: practitioners should look mostly to how it changes UK GDPR, DPA 2018 and PECR informationrightsandwrongs.com/2025/06/20/w...
The Data (Use and Access) Bill is due to receive Royal Assent on 19 June: bills.parliament.uk/bills/3825/s...
For the want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For the want of a signature the €4.3m GDPR fine against VW was lost.
themunicheye.com/volkswagen-e...