Posts by Anders Ravn Sørensen
A sharp piece in The Guardian draws on Marc Bloch and WWII to make a point about AI, that societies often misunderstand transformative technologies.
Worth a read if you think history has anything to teach us about AI (it does).
#AI #History #Tech
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Interesting anthology by Todd Presner on algorithmic ethics and holocaust remembering. For good and for worse approaching an algorithmic phenomenology?
#skyhistorians #history #genai #holocaust
press.princeton.edu/books/hardco...
Hoping that genAI isn’t just producing “slop” but actually helps us understand the past, as a thoughtful experiment in how historians might use genAI rather than fear it.
Really interesting new initiative by @benjamin-asmussen.bsky.social: using language models to reconstruct and communicate 18th-century Copenhagen month by month, grounded in historical newspapers and sources.
#history #genAI
gamlenyheder.wordpress.com/2026/04/04/1...
The question is no longer just who writes history, but what kinds of reasoning produce ethically sound histories
Historians may need to rethink ethics in the age of AI. If artificial historians can produce meaningful histories without intentions, then “practical ethics” might not be a human trait at all, but a feature of historiographical logic itself.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Thanks for the right handle. And yes, I think the conflation between the two are exactly part of the argument. That the increasing use of gAI tools become part of a historical epistemology - just one without the practical ethics of human historians.
#history #historians #genAI #articifialhistorians @marniehughes51.bsky.social
Want to recommend Marnie Hughes-Warrington’s Artificial Historians.
Loved her talk at a conference last week, where she asked the audience if they wanted to publish a research article written by AI?
The scary answer: we are doing it already without knowing it.
www.routledge.com/Artificial-H...
Hello History!
This app offers user to chat with an array of historical figures with RAG technology m. From Napoleon, Tupac and Jesus. Moving experience of the past closer to an algorithmic epistemology.
A historian tested AI on a clean, structured Tudor dataset.
The result wasn’t random but coherent, plausible interpretation that simply wasn’t true.
Still some way from completely trusting gAI 😳
www.historyworkshop.org.uk/practice-his...
“We want AI to read sources the way historians do”
A new Stanford project is trying to build AI that doesn’t just write history — but actually thinks like a historian.
Shifting AI in the humanities from text generation to transparent knowledge production?
news.stanford.edu/stories/2026...
The real challenge of AI may not be intelligence, but whether we can still deliberate together. 🙏
www.bbc.com/news/article...
It might not be as pedagogically sound as one might have hope to chat with Cleopatra or Churchill as ChatGPT RAG-personas. Students tend to ask factual questions rather than questions that could cultivate historical consciousness.
www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journal...
Hey ChatGPT, write me a fictional paper: these LLMs are willing to commit academic fraud www.nature.com/articles/d41...
AI is not just changing what humanists study. It is changing how they produce knowledge.
This review article maps how AI is already being used across the Hunanities.
What happens to interpretation and evidence and authority?
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Topic-RAG allows historians (and humanities scholars broadly) to search, say, old newspaper, not only for keywords, but for abstract concepts like ‘greed’ or ‘fear’ by organisering sources in thematic clusters.
@benjamin-asmussen.bsky.social #skyehistorians
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
The historian’s digital doping?
I know this is a couple of years old, but I just found it. It’s excellent- and it’s open source
#history #skyhistorians
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Historians and other academics being used by Grammerly as digital ghosts to review other people’s papers 😱
🙏 abonnerede på det en gang i fortiden, da jeg var i pædagogikum på Gladsaxe Gymnasium.
ars.bhl@cbs.dk
AHA’s Guiding Principles for Artificial Intelligence in History Education #AI&history
www.historians.org/wp-content/u...
Du vil nok også finde denne interessant:
www.historians.org/wp-content/u...
Ja, så godt debatten om det. Det er virkelig problematisk fordi vi nærmes os en algoritmisk fænomenologi, altså hvor viden om repræsentationer fortiden drives af LLMer der bliver selvrefererende…😳
Vil meget gerne læse din artikel. Hvis du skulle have et link til Noter…
Selv tak. Der er virkelig ikke meget om det i de danske historikerdebatter. Sidder selv lige nu og skriver på et essay til Historisk Tidsskrift bl.a. om historiefagets didaktik i en AI-tid.
AI beginning to be treated as a topic for history students’ master theses. Here an interesting MA-thesis on AI-literacy (or, rather, the lack thereof) in Danish secondary education by Andreas Winkler Bønnelykke.
projekter.aau.dk/generativ-ai...