Here is the difference between me and Gabe.

Gabe: gives factual overview of RRI order and calmly notes some issues.

Me: *shakes head, checks 3rd cir admission (still valid), reads first substantive paragraph (P 53), and then...* What. the. actual. fuck?

That feeling when you turn off the auto-reply OOO after break.* Ugh.

*Due to PJM being PJM, the term "break" is used loosely. I've taken quite a few calls and emails over the last few weeks and have read several filings.

The note from my kid's second grade teacher was that the outline below is considered "intensive support" for writing a five paragraph essay.

Ummm, I still use an outline like that to write much longer things.

Let me get this right. PJM starts the RRI basically to suit the needs of one state.

And now, even that one state is like "this proposal is a little messed up."

I spy @scottysolar.bsky.social at CHESSA.

He has no idea what is about to hit him. 😏

On a professional level, it's exciting to see these market reform issues bring forced to the forefront.

On a personal level, can we slow the hell down so I can take five minutes before jumping into another proceeding?

It's docket no. ER24-2045.

MISO's proposed new fast track/ queue jumping proposal is called "ERAS."

Can we PLEASE stop with the Taylor Swift references in MISO? It doesn't make these proposals any better.

I don't usually comment on active cases, but I will say, PJM's deficiency response in its O2023 compliance filing reads like my very southern MIL wrote it.

You all can figure out what that means.

Thanks for the write up. My read of Project 2025 several months ago (between bouts of geting physically ill from reading it) was that there was an effort to turn FERC from an economic regulator into a reliability one. What is your view on that?