Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Marius Vatasoiu

On the other side, the documentation is top. Even though it would help to have more examples/best practices, the overall documentation is one of the best. Same for both, Vite and Vitest.

LLMs know a lot of Vite/Vitest being so popular it helps.

Plugin system.

Integration between Vite and Vitest.

1 week ago 0 0 0 0

Vitest with browser mode and isolation fails on CI. There are some spikes in storage usage from Chrome's temp files.

Vitest + Istanbul coverage is really really slow.
Vitest + V8 coverage doesn't work with Chrome, only Chromium?? Not sure yet about the performance.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

I don't have control on how scripts are injected and it's quite complex to inject a script at runtime before your main entry point.

The bundle seems bigger and chunks are a little bit "unexpected". This is something I need to dive deeper.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

I started with V7 then I've waited v8 hoping it will be better, but no.

To name a few things:
Dev server in buildless mode doesn't scale - 2000 reqs for a refresh? It's slower then Webpack's incremental builds.

Dev server in build mode is not ready, at least source maps don't work at this point.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0

I don't want to throw shade on Vite/Vitest, I'm just frustrated with my experience. From outside, Vite/Vitest look top notch, but in my project they feel like the wrong tool for the job.

For context, I have a Lit-based SPA, around 200 screens and 6000 unit tests.

1 week ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
a cartoon of squidward from spongebob squarepants standing in front of a window ALT: a cartoon of squidward from spongebob squarepants standing in front of a window

This is literally me while I'm migrating to @vite.dev and @vitest.dev. Once again I think Webpack is way underestimated. After months of work, today I configured vitest for coverage. The performance is dead. From 2-3 min to 27 min? 2-3 min was already just like Karma/Webpack/Jasmine, but 27 min??

1 week ago 2 0 1 0
Post image

Had a great experience today at ING Front-End Summit. 🙏

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0

Vite+ is open source under MIT and free for everyone.

1 month ago 171 22 4 0

Thank you for all your efforts 🙏

1 month ago 3 1 0 0
Advertisement

Waited almost 2 years to buy a monitor and Apple comes with the exactly same monitor as 4 years ago 💀

🤬🤬🤬

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Does it work with vitest too?

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Is there any progress update on @vite.dev's Full Bundle Mode?
Since v8.0 is already in beta, can I hope for 8.1?

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

Well the joy didn't last. With isolation off, mock implementations get leaked in other files that use the original implementation at import time. 😪

Is this the final boss?

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

After months of investigations I think I found the problem. In isolation mode, Chrome doesn't seems to handle the load. For 1k tests in browser mode, @vitest.dev generates around 40k requests, which seems to be too much for Chrome.

2 months ago 1 0 0 1
Preview
Introducing Deno Sandbox | Deno Instant Linux microVMs with defense-in-depth security for running untrusted code.

Introducing Deno Sandbox
⭐ Instant Linux microVMs
⭐ TypeScript and Python (!) SDKs + REST API
⭐ Secure against prompt injection attacks

deno.com/blog/introdu...

2 months ago 69 15 3 4
Preview
Deno Deploy is Generally Available | Deno Deno Deploy is now generally available, plus some highlights of new features and tools.

Deno Deploy gets new features as it gains GA status.
⭐ Runs any node.js app or framework
⭐ Tunnels
⭐ Postgres databases
⭐ Built-in traces, logs, metrics

deno.com/blog/deno-de...

2 months ago 61 11 1 8
Advertisement

Any ETA for Vitest with Vite 8 (Rolldown)?

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

I'm not sure how to validate if this is indeed a real bug or a misconfig. 🤔

In the same environment, @webdevs.firefox.com doesn't have this issue.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

I'm still digging this issue and I might have found a @developer.chrome.com bug. When running @vitest.dev in browser mode with Chrome, there is a spike of some deleted but opened temp files by Chrome. In low space environments, this can hit the max limit which crushes vitest.

2 months ago 0 0 1 0

Happy New Year! 🎊

3 months ago 1 0 0 0

I've tried a docker container with Ubuntu to be closer to the Azure DevOps agents, but no issues.

The only difference seems to be some warnings about disk space 🤔

4 months ago 1 0 0 1

🙋

4 months ago 2 0 0 0

WinterTC's Minimum Common Web API standard is now officially published as ECMA-429, Edition 1 . To many more editions!

Thanks @jasnell.me, @andreubotella.com, @akiro.se, @littledan.dev and everyone else that was involved in making this happen.

🎉

4 months ago 56 11 1 0

After months of migrating to @vitest.dev, I finally managed to fix all the tests...just to find out nothing works in the pipeline 🫠

I get a weird error: Failed to fetch dynamically imported module:...

This fails after around 1000 tests. The same error I'm usually getting in headful mode locally.

4 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

Congratulations!

5 months ago 3 0 0 0
Post image

Happy Halloween! 🎃
(with some delay)

5 months ago 2 0 0 0
JavaScript operator: await: Use at module top level | Can I use... Support tables for HTML5, CSS3, etc

JavaScript top-level await is no longer considered 'baseline' due to a pretty big Safari bug caniuse.com/mdn-javascri...

The module graph fails in cases where two modules import a third at the same time. Demo: random-stuff.jakearchibald.com/bug-repros/t...

It's best to avoid the feature for now 😔

5 months ago 165 40 13 5

👀

6 months ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
SVGOMG - SVGO's Missing GUI for minifying SVGs Easy & visual compression of SVG images.

SVGOMG has been updated to use SVGO 4! (thanks Adrien Crivelli!)

This is the URL for SVGOMG. Unfortunately someone maintains a fork with ads, so, err, don't use that 😀

jakearchibald.github.io/svgomg/

6 months ago 182 32 8 0

any ETA for vite 8?

6 months ago 1 0 1 0