You too.

Yeah, you're right.

Okay, you've convinced me. I no longer believe you're a transphobe, I just think you're struggling to understand posts and have an inability to back off.

Which last is coincidentally also one of my failings.

What's the middle ground in a genocide? Just killing half the target group?

She's set the remains of Stonewall on fire already, spectacular failure

That is literally what the post you liked, meant.

...except I expect you'll keep getting your head bitten off on here.

You don't seem to be able to read a room.

Do you genuinely not understand that the post you liked had nothing to do with your own situation, but was a way to tell trans people we're asking for too much in wanting to stay alive?

If you genuinely don't then there's not much more to say...

Are you just bad at reading?

I'm not sure that's a charitable position to take. If she's well-intentioned and she's doing this, then she's incompetent to such a degree that Your Party probably want her on their national executive

Such as liking a both-sidesing transphobic post!

And then arguing about how it wasn't transphobic for an hour against trans people

More realistically I think we should be identifying major trigger points. Ending the CTA would be one, seizing our passports another.

Neither very likely yet but Farage and Badenoch could do literally anything.

Say the worst happened and it became death camps. Not likely at all but at that point we wouldn't be worrying about affordability.

Most of us will have an idea of how far it gets before it's intolerable...

Of course. But there's always going to be a trade-off, and I think the risk is significant enough now for us all to be trying to make that plan...

You know, for someone who's had grief for being wrongly accused of transphobia, you don't seem at all bothered about doing things that look transphobic.

And you saw that in this discussion of JK Rowling trying to exterminate trans people, how?

Yeah anyway, what did you like about the post that you liked?

It's that simple. You liked a transphobic post. Just explain why.

We should all have an escape plan at this point. I'm not saying we're there yet but UK politics is too unstable, and there are only a few routes to a good outcome as I see it.

And then there's the Childline safeguarding thing iirc. Very, very dodgy character even if his genocidal hatred of trans people could be overlooked.

It shouldn't be that hard a question

You're hiding from answering the question. What did you like about the post that you liked?

Deploy the tumbleweeds

It’s his interpretation of this argument. So yes he did.

bsky.app/profile/mgn3...

WHATS DOGMATIC ABOUT WSNTING TRANS PEOPLE TO LIVE, PERCY?

What point? Your point was to imply that trans people don't deserve human rights because we're too shouty?

Fuck you. You're a genocide apologist

Do you agree then that we need to be less shouty about wanting to stay alive?

Or do you think this is about some other topic?

Are you capable of understanding context?

Which trans people are being dogmatic and shouty and why is that bad in response to attempted genocide?

So WHAT DID YOU LIKE SBOUT PERCY'S POST THEN?

Fucks sakes, it's like arguing with a three year old

Bullshit.

Your opening fucking post on this was to complain about dogmatic shouty people, not to defend trans people against the eradication we're faced with.

You're a both-sidesing liar.

Ah there it is.

It didn't say "all" trans people (just most)

It's really really interesting that you haven't backed down. We're being eradicated and it's more important to you to defend a post that you really fucking know us offensive and wrong, because it's both-sidesing this