Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Collinmyshot

One thing I'm personally struggling with this year is that I don't know how to evaluate some of my bad teams.

In one league, I spent a big chunk of auction capital on Yordan, Jared Jones, Schwellenbach, and Clase. Obviously that team sucked, but I don't know what to change for next year lol

6 months ago 0 0 0 0

Example
2025
William Contreras: .260, 17 HR
Carlos Narvaez: .241, 15 HR

You might get lucky with a Cal Raleigh (ADP 86 in March) or a Hunter Goodman (ADP 318) but it's not worth chasing in the first 10 rounds

6 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Top 20 Catchers for 2024 Fantasy Baseball Top 20 Catchers for 2024 Fantasy Baseball and all the catchers' projections for every player with a breakdown of each, and sleepers.

razzball.com/top-20-catch...

@razzball.bsky.social wrote the definitive opinion piece on how to draft catcher in fantasy baseball 2 years ago imo

Tldr: every catcher is gonna hit between .240 - .260 and 15-20 hr. The 300+ pick gap between the top and bottom catchers is dumb and don't get sucked in

6 months ago 0 0 1 0

If only my Michael Harris love was as rewarded haha

6 months ago 0 0 0 0

Using Savant overall PF (and I know there's more nuance to this than one number), the park move was MASSIVE

BOS (104 PF, 2nd / 30)
to
SD (97 PF, 26th / 30)

Is comparable to moving from CIN (103 PF, 3rd /30)
to
SF (97 PF, 29th / 30)

It was a really dramatic shift in park

6 months ago 2 0 1 0

I can't find my receipts anywhere, but when he was unsigned in Feb I had "If Pivetta signs in SF he finishes top 5 in CY" as a bold prediction this year.

BOS is so underrated as a crazy babip park. Literally the 2nd most friendly offensive PF per savant, more hitter friendly than GABP

6 months ago 2 0 1 0

Yeah, 100%. You can be streaming SP like Lodolo and Eury a lot of the time too. And almost nobody has a bad team either, so it's often really competitive with lineups of absolute STUDs

6 months ago 1 0 0 0

10s are hard because the wire is so good. Like Heliot Ramos was not rosterable in 10s from July onward, but was 100% owner in every other format

6 months ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

20% K supported by SwStr and Stuff+. ERA estimators in the mid 4s. The upside here is Eflin. He should be nowhere near the top 40 imo

6 months ago 0 0 0 0

Luis Garcia Jr '24
JJ Bleday '24
Michael Harris '23
Dalton Varsho '22
Cedric Mullins '21
Austin Hays '21

Are some examples off the top of my head

6 months ago 0 0 0 0

There's a category of player who I've been burned by a lot the last couple years which is "bats who have a legitimately great season that is mostly supported by reasonable growth in underlying stats but with no prior track record of being above average" and I feel like those guys aren't good bets

6 months ago 0 0 1 0

If you expected the same number of PA in 2024 and 2025, you were almost spot on. 528 PA in 2024 vs 507 PA in 2025 with 6 games to go

FG auction calc values
2025: 2B 20, +$1
2024: 2B 4, $12

Even accounting for a platoon split, it's a complete bust from a guy who made very believable improvements

6 months ago 0 0 1 0

This was me looking at Luis Garcia Jr this past off-season lol

6 months ago 0 0 1 0

To be clear, I agree with you that we have enough of a sample to not believe in the breakout coming.

But I was just providing the case for why I've been in the last couple years and why I expect him to still be drafted as an upside sleeper type guy next year

7 months ago 0 0 0 0

And that tweak only took Pivetta, what, 6 years and going to a new team? So it'll happen for Pfaadt any day now I'm sure

7 months ago 0 0 0 0

Yeah, that would be the one problem with his game lol

But that's the thing. He doesn't need to reinvent himself completely to be good. The velo and command agent problems.

He just has to find a way to be even just ok against lefties. It's one tweak away.

7 months ago 0 0 2 0
Advertisement

I think the bullish case is his career stats vsRHB

217 IP
224 K
3.56 xFIP
19.8% K-BB

That's probably a top 20ish SP most years.

But I agree generally with what you're saying.

7 months ago 0 0 1 0

I think Pfaadt, Taj Bradley, and Nick Pivetta (in BOS) are all a similar category of dude.

There's obvious potential to be a true fantasy difference maker but also clear flaws that need to be addressed before they can take that step

7 months ago 0 0 0 1

On the broadcast they said Skenes is 13-0 in games where he received 3+ runs of support for his career. 14-0 after today

8 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

He's working on it

9 months ago 1 0 0 0

Man, baseball is *nuanced*

9 months ago 1 0 0 0

Ah, thanks for the clarification. The other things I noticed is how weird it is having elite contact guys like Kwan and Arraez on the same side as high career K guys like Suwinski and Raley

9 months ago 0 0 2 0

I think the more consistent swing paths may actually be harmful as it makes you easier to pitch to. Avoid pitching to the exact swing path and those hitters will struggle more to adjust

9 months ago 1 0 1 0

The NLBM is one of the coolest baseball experiences I have ever had and this sucks

9 months ago 9 1 0 0

Through July 3, Logan Webb has more strikeouts (127) than

Hunter Brown (126)
Dylan Cease (121)
Paul Skenes (115)
Chris Sale (114)

Just like we all predicted

9 months ago 3 1 0 0

The .194 slg to .445 xSLG also seems relevant to Jac generally lol

9 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

If he qualified, he'd have the 6th worst o-swing among qualified hitters. Right next to Sal Perez, Yainer Diaz, Nick Castellanos.

Streaky players, but all definitely major league caliber hitters. Any improvement there seems like it could unlock something serious

9 months ago 2 0 1 0

Wow that aggression is incredible lol. I know your model is far more sophisticated than just o-swing and z-con, but being under 40% and nearly at 90% respectively seems like the aggression isn't necessarily a huge problem?

In my mind, I've been comping him to Nick Castellanos

9 months ago 1 0 0 0

Do you have one of these for Jac?

9 months ago 1 0 1 0

I imagine this was meant to read like "Have fun! We sure did!" But instead, I read it as Yoda "Have fun, we did"

9 months ago 1 0 0 0