Couldn't win your 1s there for a change?

Bro wants to see the like count tick to 5+ on his phone notification so badly. Nah.

"Gatekeepers of the primary."

"Coalition builders."

Aight.

You responded, just now.

What a way to find out you should never ally with or become khive... lol.

Streisand Effect go brrrrrrrrr

Too late now, honey. Lmao.

'92 era Clintonism must be purged.

Nobody under 35 or even 40 is sitting down and tuning into MSNBC, Jeff.

The internet is where people get their information, and thats the place centrist democrats won't or can't reach.

Never learn your lesson, guys. Going real well.

Skeeting to a following of GenXers that are on the losing end of the eventual 95-5 issue is genuinely worthy of an internet baker act.

The freeze frame is legendary.

He's made clear indications that he genuinely believes the things he says and that makes it even more sad.

Who owns homes and who doesn't. Who has generational wealth and who doesn't.

There's your distinction.

A new word needs to be made to describe the embarrassment of getting one-upped by boomers.

generation lead never fails

The material conditions present have all but guaranteed that won't happen.

Go away dawg.

Called Medicare for All "pie in the sky" as 16 year old me watched my mom be monitored for cancer.

The hatred is eternal.

Clinton stans.

We might actually get President Vance lmao

Turn and face the mirror and try to get one poast in without a crashout.

Four times was four too many. She's a neo-con.

A neo-con does not give a shit about democracy.

At the absolute beginning yes, then immediately after that my hyperbole about Cheney.

I'm still making the argument that the best way of knowing if it helped, polling data, just doesn't show anything substantially changing for Harris with former GOP or conservative voters.

That would be the whole point of shoe horning a Cheney on stage. To get the "disaffected republican."

I made the argument at the start that Harris made zero beneficial extracts from Cheney. The article I linked included extra arguments about "electoral disaster." I *could* make that argument on top of my original point if you wanted me to. Easy enough argument.

Note the underlined sections, and note that when I said "campaigning" I meant with Liz Cheney, the one individual centerpiece to my argument from the beginning.

That is an insane thing to attribute to a SINGLE endorsement and her campaigning with a highly despised person within the democratic party; neo-con Liz Cheney.

Maybe she shouldn't have campaigned with a Cheney and instead spent that time campaigning elsewhere and distancing from Biden so as to maximize her controllable chances.