No molecular chirality. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding is possible though.
Posts by John Protasiewicz
Those are really cool images as well! We do not see twisted (yet) but see some evidence that there is a connection (hard to avoid pun) in some cases between chunkier crystals and thin rods. I have had three different students grow these oddities since at first I was uncertain if it was real.
Anyone ever seen such crazy crystals before or know what's going on? #chemsky
They were passing out these notes for upcoming Jon Husted protest at the No Kings rally in Cleveland yesterday. I also noted this very large banner. #NoKings
Very easy way to support NSF!
Normally not a fan of ads but this one rocks! Go science! www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj-R...
NSF building on Eisenhower Av. HUD now owns.
Destroying the NSF mural in the foyer. Of the Eisenhower building.
The National Science Foundation sign on our Eisenhower Av building is now gone.
The NSF mural in the foyer is removed and torn off in sheets.
We were supposed to celebrate the 75th anniversary of the agency in May 2025. That never happened.
And one of those happens to be a major holiday…..SMH
Short window?!
Let's be clear: the US National Science Foundation's decision to reduce the role of expert panelists and outside reviewers does not limit the burden on NSF workers; it empowers them to make funding decisions without scientific oversight.
www.science.org/content/arti...
So my grad student was trying to grow single crystals of a new compound for X-ray crystallography, and instead got candy canes, a packman, and other alphabet letters.
If the crystals could now self assemble into necessary text for a manuscript then life would be good....
Logo for the 55th Inorganic Discussion Weekend at Western University, London, Ontario. Image contains a tree with a ferrocene molecule.
We're excited to announce that the 55th Inorganic Discussion Weekend will take place November 7th-9th, 2025 at Western University! Registration and abstract submission are NOW OPEN on our website: idw2025.ca
More details of the event can be found on our website!
To all of my friends at NASA, NSF, & NOAA - thank you for all that you do.
Wonderful science showcased on BlueSky daily! But usually no mention of who funded the work. At a time when federal agencies such as NSF, NIH, etc. are facing challenges & uncertainties, scientists should also acknowledge sponsors to communicate to general public great science the agencies enable!
I understand reviewers concerns. A large number of young scientists worked hard to write and submit NSF CAREER proposals very recently. Their future livelihoods depend on the greater scientific community for qualified reviews and panelists for critical assessment. Do we simply abandon them?
I can't speak with certainty to future possible reorganization(s), but currently (as in past), panel and individual reviewers are advisory. POs make recommendations using this input, but these must be concurred by director(s), and final decisions and awards made by DGA
www.nsf.gov/funding/over...
To add one more point, the recent (negative) changes are outside NSF program officers control, and arrive with no advance notice. There are limited or no way to communicate messages upward. Hence, carefully worded letters aimed to protect jobs are crafted. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/22/s...
Declining to serve on an NSF panel does not make a statement, it makes the program officers job harder. I wrote a letter to editor on this specific topic. Another potential outcome of collective declines is that helps justify the use of AI to replace human reviews, IMHO.
tinyurl.com/yc2xtc2d
Here's a short PSA for those invited by NSF program officers to serve as reviewers or panelists for the National Science Foundation. #NSF #chemsky Thanks!
tinyurl.com/yc2xtc2d
(last letter to the editor in series)
BIG: A new executive order changes fundamentally how the U.S. awards research grants, giving oversight to political appointees in coordination with OMB.
All new grant opportunities are paused until these appointees are in place.
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Professors Robert Gilliard and John Protasiewicz standing in front of NSF headquarters building.
Had a great visit from my former postdoc @rjgilliard.bsky.social this week! Good to introduce him to some other program officers as well.
With the upcoming heat wave, I’ll need some of that cyclopentane flavored ice cream I saw the other day. #chemsky
Jumbleberry Crumble is #RecipeOfTheDay! Which is absolutely how it should be www.nigella.com/recipes/jumb...
Outstanding and well deserved!
Many of you may have known Greg Hillhouse, who passed away in 2014. A memorial fellowship has been set up in his honor at the U. of Chicago chemistry department. Here is the link if you are interested in finding out more.
www.trailblazers.psd.uchicago.edu/gregory-hill...
Infographic on suppressing wildfires with chemistry. The graphic looks at Phos-chek, a fire retardant which contains ammonium phosphates or sulfates as the active ingredient. The red colour comes from iron(III) oxide. While Phos-Chek only causes mild skin and eye irritation for humans, it’s hazardous to aquatic organisms. When applied in front of wildfires, Phos-Chek forms phosphate esters which form a protective char that slows wildfires’ spread.
As wildfires rage in LA, this graphic in @cenmag.bsky.social looks at one way chemistry can be used to tackle them: cen.acs.org/environment/...
#ChemSky 🧪