Hey folks; the person building Trunk is really having trouble pulling it together financially this month, in a time of the year where it's hard to find work and a job market that is generally hostile.
Your money literally translates to the ability to keep me housed.
Thread has more.
In this podcast episode with Daniela Bomatter, we discuss the possibility of a third attractor. I explain how my initiative The Civic Enlightenment Project is part an effort to organize civil society and evolve governmental institutions. www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uvt...
I co-authored this recently published white paper Mapping an Ecology of Integrative Approaches to Addressing the Metacrisis integrallife.com/mapping-ecol...
Integral sensemaking for global and national events youtu.be/3XvmihMpSaU?...
On Dec 18 at 1pm PST, I'll be co-hosting: Integral Sensemaking for Global & National Events integrallife.com/event/integr...
Sapolsky is offering one opinion here and there are other highly regarded scientists who would disagree. You seem to be equating disagreeing on this matter with hate speech and intolerance. You are a small minded person and you insist on using a fake profile. You are not J.K. Rowling.
That example sounds like hate speech, but you have nothing close to that for J.K Rowling. Saying that trans women are biologically male and should not be allowed into spaces reserved for biological women is not hate speech, not intolerant. That is all the real J.K. Rowling ever said
The Nazis were intolerant of Jews. Matthew Shephard's murderers were intolerant of gays. If someone merely says that a trans woman is not a woman and should not be allowed into women's spaces, this is based on biological facts and is quite tolerant of these people as humans and as biological men
@bsky.app needs to remove your access to this account because you are not J.K Rowling. The credibility of this platform, and the perception of this platform as a marketplace of diverse ideas, is threatened if this can continue. You want to say that, please use your own name like an honest person
This isn't intolerance. This isn't direct incitement of violence. Not close. You are just simply uncomfortable with opinions that you don't like and you wish to prevent them from being spoken publicly. You are trying to enforce ideological purity. And you're sockpuppeting.
The burden is on you to make the case that someone's speech is intolerant, and the bar is quite high. I get the sense that you just would prefer to deplatform anyone who doesn't tow the woke line.
Intolerance is a very serious word that I think you don't understand the meaning of. You need to draw a clear line from someone's speech to acts of violence. I think you lack the cognitive capacity and sobriety of mind to consider and rationally discuss opinions different from your own.
That you are referring to Ms. Rowling in the 3rd person confirms that you are not her. I do not agree with your application of the paradox of tolerance to this situation. The real Rowling has said many things that are unpopular among so-called woke people, but they are not intolerant.
I don't think you are the real J.K. Rowling and I reported this account. It is unlikely she would say this. The real J.K. Rowling has opinions on cultural issues that are not popular among cultural progressives, but that should nonetheless be allowed to be expressed on the BlueSky platform.
