Regardless of intent, we are seeing aspects of major digital media literacy deficiencies with this.
Posts by Ami
The former head of SOCOM posting an AI “enhanced” photo, which includes a headless ICE agent and several other hallucinations, that is then picked up by major news networks running it (with no mention that it’s AI) at a particularly volatile time - seems incredibly problematic.
i delete all my replies, all the time, i got an entire app that does it for me
*your mom joke*
“my mom is dead”
jfc you’re as dumb as your posts
bc i’m making fun of you, you dweeb. you are exactly the kind of idiot who believes everything they read on the internet. I know what i have and haven’t done.
getting your info from folks who bullied their own “best friend” to suicide. smh.
you rn
it’s so adorable watching people figure out how congress works (and doesn’t)
lmao no it’s not.
love,
former senate staffer
oh of course it’s not the shooter’s fault
What's up, Bluesky? We thought you might've missed some of our greatest hits, so we put this together for you.
Can't wait to spend more quality time together! ❤️🇺🇸
can’t believe he called the fat generals fat lmao
he called the fat generals fat. i’m good w that.
If it is easier to believe that there is a vast gov conspiracy to paint shooters as leftists as opposed to simply acknowledging there is a nihilistic violence problem in (mostly) young men, you have a bias issue.
if you can’t hit the broad side of a barn bc you’re a terrible shot, anyone and everyone is a potential victim.
evidence is what it is.
Just coming back to see if you had anything to say on the substance. It turns out, you don’t.
Contorting oneself into a pretzel so that the facts can fit your narrative, or simply denying facts at all is some wacky stuff.
These texts between Kirk’s shooter and his lover were included in the indictment.
it’s in the indictment. the texts btwn him and his lover.
From the indictment
from the NYTs and indictment
You deflect bc you were wrong. Maybe think about the assumptions you made instead of fantasizing about me.
so now that the new york times has reported it and the shooter’s own texts have been released?
it’s in the new york times
You got anything to say now that it’s been proven you were wrong?
I’ve got a pic for you. Via the New York Times
just coming back to see if you had anything to say now that it’s public Charlie Kirk was killed for being conservative.
the facts are inconvenient to your narrative